Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1987-06-24 until 1987-07-31
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1987
Report date:
1987

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
1983
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Potassium hexadecyl hydrogen phosphate
EC Number:
242-768-1
EC Name:
Potassium hexadecyl hydrogen phosphate
Cas Number:
19035-79-1
Molecular formula:
C16H35O4P.K
IUPAC Name:
potassium hexadecyl hydrogen phosphate
Test material form:
liquid

Method

Target gene:
The Salmonella typhimurium histidine (his) reversion system measures his- -> his+ reversions. The Salmonella typhimurium strains are constructed to differentiate between base-pair substitution (TA 100, TA 1535, TA 102) and frameshift (TA 98, TA 1537).
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
other: S. typhimurium TA 1538, TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 97, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9 mix (from rats induced with phenobarbital/ß-naphthoflavone)
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
For the plate incorporation test: 10 - 1000 µg/plate
For the preincubation test: 5 - 500 µg/plate

Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: hot water (80°C).
Controlsopen allclose all
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
sodium azide
Remarks:
TA100, TA1535
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
2-acetylaminofluorene
Remarks:
TA98, TA1538
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: ICI 191
Remarks:
TA 1537 and TA 97
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
mitomycin C
Remarks:
TA 102
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: 2-Aminoanthracene (2-AA)
Remarks:
used with all strains
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION:
- experiment I: plate incorporation test
- experiment II: pre-incubation test

DURATION
- Pre-incubation period: 30 min at 37°C (pre-incubation test)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 hours
- Number of independent experiments: 2 main experiments
- Number of replicates: 4 plates per concentration
Evaluation criteria:
The test substance was considered mutagenic if it induces at least a doubling of the number of spontaneous revertants and a dose response was recognizable. Clearly this rule of thumb has a questionable scientific foundation.
Statistics:
Mean values and standard deviations

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
toxic effects were visible at the highest concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
toxic effects were visible at the highest concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1538
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
toxic effects were visible at the highest concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 97
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
toxic effects were visible at the highest concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
toxic effects were visible at the highest concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
toxic effects were visible at the highest concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
toxic effects were visible at the highest concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
True negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Water solubility: The test compound was dissolved in H2O at 80°C. Upon addition to the aqueous medium in the preincubation assay increasingly milky suspensions were formed starting at 50 µg/plate of the test substance.



Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The test substance induced no genetic damage (considered not mutagenic) in the Ames test under the described experimental conditions.
Executive summary:

Potassium hexadecylphosphate was examined for mutagenic activity in the Ames test (plate incorporation and preincubation assay). The concentration range from 10 to 1000 µg/plate in the plate incorporation assay and from 5 to 500 µg/plate in the preincubation assay was tested with seven tester strains (TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 1538, TA 97, TA 98, TA 100, TA 102). Toxic effects were visible at the highest concentrations. The tests were performed in absence as well as in presence of a phenobarbital/ß-naphthoflavone-induced rat liver homogenate fraction (S9).

The test compound was dissolved in H2O at 80°C. Upon addition to the aqueous medium in the preincubation assay increasingly milky suspensions were formed starting at 50 µg/plate of the test substance.

The test substance did not induce an increase of the frequency of revertant colonies in any of the seven tester strains used. Responsiveness of the tester strains and activity of the S9 mix were demonstrated by using appropriate positive controls for each specific strain.

Thus, it can be concluded that neither the test substance per se, nor one of its metabolites formed under the described experimental conditions induced genetic damage in the Ames test and in the preincubation modification.