Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-700-6 | CAS number: 109-74-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.53 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 15 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 13.22 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The most sensitive endpoint was the 90-day oral study where the rat NOAEL was 15 mg/kg/day for males and 25 mg/kg/day for females. As it is not reasonable to set sex-specific DNEL’s in a work environment, the 15 mg/kg/day value is used for both sexes.
The oral dose was converted to inhalation by dividing by 0.38 m3/kg BW ( for an 8 hour exposure) = 39.47 mg/m3. The was corrected for default bioavailability (100% oral to 50% inhalation) by dividing by 2, = 19.74 mg/m3. This was corrected for light work by multiplying by 0.67, = 13.22 mg/m3.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default value
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- correction for subchronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- No scaling for inhalation
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default value
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Default value
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default value
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default value
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.14 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 15 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 14.07 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The most sensitive endpoint was the 90-day oral study where the rat NOAEL was 15 mg/kg/day for males and 25 mg/kg/day for females. As it is not reasonable to set sex-specific DNEL’s in a work environment, the 15 mg/kg/day value is used for both sexes.
The oral dose was converted from a 7 day exposure in the rat study to a 5 day work wee exposure by multiplying by 1.4 (15*1.4= 21 mg/kg/day). This was corrected for light work by multiplying by 0.67 (21* 0.67 = 14.07.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default value
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- subchronic to chronic
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Default value
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Default value
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default value
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default value
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default value
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
No DNEL for acute/short-term exposure via dermal route is needed, because the acute systemic toxicity of N-Butyronitrile by dermal route is low (LD50 > 2000 mg/kg bw). The long-term systemic DNEL is sufficient to ensure that acute systemic effects do not occur, provided high-peak acute exposure can be avoided.
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
DNEL Derivations for n-Butyronitrile (NBN)
General Population: As NBN is only used as in industrial product, with limited uses and is available to the general population, DNEL values for the general population were not calculated.
Workers:
Long-term
Inhalation
- The most sensitive endpoint was the 90-day oral study where the rat NOAEL was 15 mg/kg/day for males and 25 mg/kg/day for females. As it is not reasonable to set sex-specific DNEL’s in a work environment, the 15 mg/kg/day value is used for both sexes.
- The oral dose was converted to inhalation by dividing by 0.38 m3/kg BW ( for an 8 hour exposure) = 39.47 mg/m3. The was corrected for default bioavailability (100% oral to 50% inhalation) by dividing by 2, = 19.74 mg/m3. This was corrected for light work by multiplying by 0.67, = 13.22 mg/m3.
- For the assessment factors, the following were used: 1 for interspecies (no allometric scaling for inhalation), 5 for intraspecies, 2 for subchronic to chronic and 2.5 for remaining interspecies for a total of 25. 13.22/25 = 0.53 mg/m3.
Dermal:
-- The most sensitive endpoint was the 90-day oral study where the rat NOAEL was 15 mg/kg/day for males and 25 mg/kg/day for females. As it is not reasonable to set sex-specific DNEL’s in a work environment, the 15 mg/kg/day value is used for both sexes.
- The oral dose was converted from a 7 day exposure in the rat study to a 5 day work wee exposure by multiplying by 1.4 (15*1.4= 21 mg/kg/day). This was corrected for light work by multiplying by 0.67 (21* 0.67 = 14.07.
- Adjustment factors were 5 for intraspecies, 4 for allometric scaling, 2.5 for remaining interspecies and 2 for subchronic to chronic (100 total).
- The DNEL is 14.07/100 = 0.14 mg/kg/day
Oral:
Oral DNEL’s are not developed for workers.
Acute DNEL’s
- According to REACH Appendix R.8-8, Acute Toxicity, an acute DNEL is only developed if the long-term DNEL is not adequate for worker protection and there is evidence of a “peak exposure”. NBN is a industrial chemical is that normally used in closed systems. Any sort of exposure is highly discouraged, so there should never be a “peak exposure” situation, and the long-term DNEL should be protective.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
Additional information - General Population
N-Butyronitrile is used exclusively in industry so exposure to the general population is not a valid parameter.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
