Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 240-795-3 | CAS number: 16731-55-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
A 3-generation chronic toxicity study (Til et al. 1972a) with treatment of rats (20 per sex and group) with dose levels of 0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0% Na2S2O5 administered in a 50 ppm thiamine-containing diet was identified as most reliable study for repeated dose toxicity and was defined as key study (read-across info, see `discussion`). Based on the read across concept for the group of sulfite substances, this result is also applicable to dipotassium disulfite..
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity: oral, other
- Remarks:
- combined repeated dose and reproduction toxicity
- Type of information:
- read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- not specified
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Remarks:
- Very well-documented study which allows derivation of a NOAEL value for chronic toxicity. Most reliable study for NOAEL deriviation for repeated dose toxicity effects of sodium metabisulfite.
- Justification for type of information:
- see attachment “Read-across concept – Human Health/Environment - Category approach for Inorganic sulfites/thiosulfates/dithionite" in section 13.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- In a three-generation feeding study, groups of 20 male and 20 female Wistar rats received 0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0% sodium metabisulphite, i.e. 49, 108, 220, 460, and 955 mg/kg bw/d as actual dose in a thiamine-containing diet over periods of 2 years.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- not specified
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Details on species / strain selection:
- not specified
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: derived from the Institute's Wistar-derived colony
- Age at study initiation: weanling or young rats
- Housing: housed in groups of 5 in screen-bottomed cages
- Diet (ad libitum): basal diet was Institute's stock diet, with following percentage composition: 35% ground yellow maize, 26 % ground whole wheat, 10% soyabean-oil meal, 8% fish meal, 4% meat scraps, 2.7% dried whey, 3% brewer's yeast, 3.3% vitamin preparations, 1.5% minerals, 0.5% NaCl, 3% soyabean-oil, 3% grass meal.
- Water (ad libitum): tap water
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 24 - 26 °C - Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Details on route of administration:
- In view of the widespread use of sulphite in foods and drinks it was considered desirable to re-examine the toxicity of sulphite administered in the diet.
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on oral exposure:
- DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): diets were freshly prepared every 2 weeks.
- Sulphite was added by mechanical mixing of Na2S2O5 at levels varying from 0.125 to 8%.
- In order to compensate for the destruction of thiamine by sulphite, the stock diet was drastically enriched with 50 ppm thiamine.
- Storage temperature of food: diets were stored at -18°C and the rats were provided daily with a fresh portion of previously frozen diet. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Diets were analysed for SO2 and thiamine.
Results:
- SO2 determinations on the diets showed considerable losses of sulphite.
- proportionally the losses of sulphite decreased with increasing dietary levels of sulphite both immediately after mixing and after storage for 2 wk at - 18 °C and subsequent storage for 24 hr at room temperature.
- thiamine content decreased after storage for 2 wk at -18'C only in the 1 and 2% sulphite diets. Subsequent storage for 24 hr at room temperature showed slight and similar losses at 0, 0.125 and 0.25 %, but at higher sulphite levels there was a definite tendency towards greater losses with an increase of sulphite in the diet.
- during the experimental period, the rats consumed food that was stored on average for 1 week at -18°C and subsequently kept in the feeders for 12 hr at 24°C. The losses amounted to 22, 14, 12, 8 and 4.5 % Na2S20s and 2.7, 1.7, 8.3, 14.5 and 15.4% thiamine in the diets supplemented with 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1 and 2 % sulphite, respectively. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 104 weeks (21 weeks or 34 weeks before mating and up to a total of 104 weeks)
- Frequency of treatment:
- continuously
- Dose / conc.:
- 0.125 other: %
- Remarks:
- ca. 50 mg/kg bw (nominal in diet)
- Dose / conc.:
- 0.25 other: %
- Remarks:
- ca. 110 mg/kg bw (nominal in diet)
- Dose / conc.:
- 0.5 other: %
- Remarks:
- ca. 220 mg/kg bw (nominal in diet)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 other: %
- Remarks:
- ca. 460 mg/kg bw (nominal in diet)
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 other: %
- Remarks:
- ca. 960 mg/kg bw (nominal in diet)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 20 males / 20 females
- Control animals:
- yes, plain diet
- Details on study design:
- not specified
- Positive control:
- not specified
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Cage side observations checked: clinical signs and mortality
At week 32, 64 and 100 all rats were examined for occult blood in the faeces.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Not specified
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: weekly for the first 12 weeks and once every four week thereafter.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE:
- Time schedule for examinations of food consumption: at intervals during 1-week periods.
FOOD EFFICIENCY: Not specified
WATER CONSUMPTION: Not specified
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: Not specified
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: week 52, 78, and 100
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: Not specified
- Animals fasted: Not specified
- How many animals: 6 – 10 animals of each sex from the control, 1 and 2 % groups
- Parameters checked: haemoglobin concentration, haematocrit value, numbers of erythrocytes, total and individual types of leukocytes
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: week 52 and 104.
- Animals fasted: Not specified
- How many animals: not specified
- Parameters checked: glutamic-oxalacetic transaminases and glutamic-pyruvic transaminases.
URINALYSIS: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of urine: week 13, 28, 52, 78, and 101
- Metabolism cages used for collection of urine: Not specified
- Animals fasted: Not specified
- How many animals: 5-11 rats of each sex, usually from the controls and the 1 and 2 % groups
- Parameters checked: phenol-red excretion. glutamic-oxalacetic transaminases, specific gravity, appearance, pH, glucose, albumin, occult blood, ketones, and microscopy of the sediment.
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: Not specified - Sacrifice and pathology:
- SACRIFICE: Yes
- After 52 weeks, 5 males and 5 females of each diet group were killed for interim organ weights analysis and gross pathology.
- At week 104 all survivors were killed.
GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
- At week 104 all survivors were killed and the heart, kidneys, liver, spleen, brain, testes, ovaries, pituitary, thyroid and adrenals were weighed as well as fixed.
- Rats that died or were killed when moribund were also autopsied, but tissue samples were preserved only if autolysis was not too advanced.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
- Tissue samples were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 5 µm and stained with haematoxylin and eosin.
- The following tissues were examined: heart, kidneys, liver, spleen, brain (three levels), testes, ovaries, pituitary, thyroids, parathyroids, adrenals, thymus, lungs, trachea, salivary glands, gastro-intestinal tract (six levels), pancreas, urinary bladder, skeletal muscle, spinal cord, femoral nerve, skin, bone marrow (sternum), axillary and mesenteric lymph nodes, exorbital lachrymal gland, aorta, mammary glands, uterus, prostate, seminal vesicle and coagulating gland. - Other examinations:
- - Thiamine was determined in the pooled urine samples of 5-10 male and 5 - 10 female rats of each group at several stages and also in pooled liver samples of five rats of each sex at week 52 and 104.
- Statistics:
- not specified
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- - All rats in the highest dose group showed indications of occult blood in the faeces, while this effect occurred in only 21-60% of the animals on diets containing 1 % sulphite.
- In 10 % of the females given 0.25 % and in 10 % of the males given 0.5 % sulphite slight indications of intestinal blood loss were observed at wk 32 only. - Mortality:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- no effects observed
- Urinalysis findings:
- no effects observed
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Immunological findings:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- - Pathological changes attributable to the feeding of sulphite were observed only in the stomach.
- A distinctly raised and thickened limiting ridge and small amounts of a reddish-brown flocky material in the mucus layer of the glandular stomach were seen grossly in the groups given the two highest sulphite levels. - Neuropathological findings:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- - Hyperplastic changes were seen in both the forestomach and glandular stomach at the 1.0 and 2.0% sulphite level. They were either present only at the 1 and 2 % dosage levels or their incidence was distinctly increased at these levels.
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Details on results:
- CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY
- General conditions of the rats remained good during the first 72 weeks.
- After this time, aging symptoms developed in many rats and mortality increased rapidly.
- The survival in the sulphite groups was generally higher than in the controls.
BODY WEIGHT AND WEIGHT GAIN
- Body weights were comparable irrespective of treatment.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE
- There were no distinct differences in food consumption.
HAEMATOLOGY
- Haemoglobin, haematocrit values and erythrocyte counts were marginally reduced at 2% sulphite at week 52, 78, and 100.
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
- Significant (P < 0.05) decreases in serum glutamic-pyruvic-transaminase values occured at wk 104 in male rats receiving 0.125 % sulfite.
- Otherwise, there were no differences between the test and control animals in transaminase activities either at week 52 or at week 104.
URINALYSIS
- Kidney function: phenol-red excretion, specific gravity and glutamic-oxalacetic-transaminase activity in the urine were not adversely affected.
- Urine analysis values were essentially normal.
ORGAN WEIGHTS
- Interim results obtained after 1 year did not indicate any effect of sulphite on organ to body weight ratios.
- Terminally the relative weights of the livers were lower in all the test groups than in the controls, but there was no evidence of a dose-related response.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: NON-NEOPLASTIC
- The type and incidence of the other non-neoplastic lesions observed were comparable in test and control groups.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: NEOPLASTIC
- The number of lymphoreticular pulmonary tumours in males decreased with increasing levels of sulphite in the diet.
- The incidence of thyroid and pituitary tumours in the control group of the males was exceptionally low, whereas those noted in the various test groups represented numbers normally found in the strain used.
- All other neoplasms occurred in a random manner with no apparent relationsship between number, location of tumours and treatment.
OTHER FINDINGS
- There was a dose-related decrease in the thiamine content of the urine at sulphite levels of 0.125 % and above and in the liver at levels above 0.25 %
- The group given 2 % sulphite showed no distinct changes in the thiamine status when compared with control rats on the stock diet without extra thiamine. - Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- local effects
- Effect level:
- 108 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: see "Remarks"
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- systemic effects
- Effect level:
- > 955 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No signs of systemic toxicity were observed and the NOAEL can be expected above the highest dose of 2% metabisulphite corresponding to 955 mg/kg bw/d Na2S2O5 (or 640 mg/kg bw/d as SO2 equivalents).
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- Based on the occurrence of occult blood in the faeces and changes in gastric morphology at dose levels of 0.5% or more, the NOAEL for local effects in this study is represented by the dose of 0.25% metabisulphite (or 0.215% accounting for the loss of metabisulphite). The corrected dose level corresponded to a dose of 108 mg/kg bw/d Na2S2O5 or an equivalent dose of 72 mg SO2/kg bw/day. Because there were no evidence of systemic toxicity following chronic treatment, the NOAEL for systemic effects can be expected above the highest dose of 2% metabisulphite corresponding to 955 mg/kg bw/d of Na2S2O5 (or 640 mg/kg bw/d as SO2 equivalents).
Reference
Calculation of the dose level in mg/kg bw/d was done by converting % diet into ppm and by assuming an average body weight for older rats of 400 g and a daily feed intake of 20 g as follows:
0.215 % = 2150 ppm x 0.05 = 108 mg/kg bw/d Na2S2O5, equivalent to 72 mg/kg bw/d SO2
1.91% = 19100 ppm x 0.05 = 955 mg/kg bw/dNa2S2O5, equivalent to 640 mg/kg bw/d SO2
Endpoint conclusion
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 126 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- chronic
- Species:
- rat
Additional information
Read-across concept for sulfites, hydrogensulfites, metabisulfites, dithionites and thiosulfates:
A comprehensive read-across concept has been developed for sulfites, hydrogensulfites and metabisulfites, based on the pH-dependant equilibrium in aqueous solutions which is summarised in the following equations:[1],[2]
SO2+ H2O <->`H2SO3´ H2SO3<->H++ HSO3-<->2H++SO32- 2HSO3-<->H2O +S2O52-
Since the nature of the cation (i.e., sodium, potassium, ammonium…) is not assumed to contribute substantially to differences in toxicity and solubility (all compounds are very soluble in water), only the chemical and biological properties of the anion are considered as relevant determinants. Based on the described equilibrium correlations, unrestricted read-across between the groups of sulfites, hydrogensulfites and metabisulfites is considered justified.
Additionally, it is known that sodium dithionite disproportionates in water to form sodium hydrogen sulfite and sodium thiosulfate (equation II)[2],[1], so that this substance can also be considered to be covered by the read-across concept described above. Since it can easily be anticipated that the substance is not stable enough under physiological conditions to fulfil the requirements of study guidelines, instead the products of decomposition have to be considered:
2 S2O42-+ H2O→2HSO3-+ S2O32-
Not fully covered by this read-across concept is the substance class of thiosulfates: although the thiosulfates are also well known to disproportionate in aqueous solution to form polythionic acids and SO2(HSO3-), this requires somewhat different, more acidic conditions. Therefore, read-across to sulfites is primarily restricted to appropriate physiological conditions, i.e. oral administration where the gastric passage with the strongly acidic conditions in the stomach will facilitate the chemical disproportionation described above:
HS2O3-+ H2S2O3→HS3O3- + SO2+ H2O
[1]Hollemann Wiberg, Lehrbuch der Anorganischen Chemie, 101.Auflage
[2]Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, Ed. Lide, DR, 88thedition, CRC Press
Oral toxicity:
Male and female rats received 0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0% Na2S2O5in a thiamine-containing diet (50 ppm) for 104 weeks. Based on the occurrence of occult blood in faeces and changes in gastric morphology at dose levels of 0.5% or more, the NOAEL for local chronic toxicity in this study is represented by the dose of 0.25% metabisulfite (or 0.215% accounting for the loss of metabisulfite). The corrected dose level corresponded to a dose of 108 mg/kg bw/d Na2S2O5or an equivalent dose of 126 mg/kg bw/day potassium metabisulfite. Because there was no evidence of systemic toxicity following chronic treatment, the NOAEL for systemic effects can be expected above the highest dose of 2% sodium metabisulfite corresponding to 955 mg/kg bw/d of Na2S2O5or 1117 mg/kg bw/d potassium sulfite.
Repeated dose toxicity, dermal:
According to regulation (EC) 1907/2006 Annex XI (weight of evidence), testing for sub-chronic dermal toxicity is not considered to be required, for the following reason: repeated dose toxicity study via dermal route does not need to be performed since the physico-chemical and toxicological properties do not suggest potential for a significant rate of absorption through the skin (for more information, refer to the section on toxicokinetics).
Repeated dose toxicity, inhalation:
According to regulation (EC) 1907/2006 Annex XI (weight of evidence), testing for sub-chronic inhalation toxicity is not considered to be required, for the following reasons: iIn accordance with ECHA guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment-chapter R.8: characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for human health, May 2008, a DNEL for systemic effects can also be derived by route-to-route extrapolation from a 90-day oral toxicity study in rats. Thus, the calculated NOAEL of 1117 mg/kg bw/d potassium metabisulfite from the chronic oral toxicity study with sodium metabisulfite was used as the starting point for DNEL derivation.
Inconclusion, it is neither scientifically nor justified due to animal welfare reasons to initiate further inhalation toxicity studies.
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
(target organ) digestive: stomach
Justification for classification or non-classification
Repeated dose toxicity, oral
Local effects in the stomach were the most predominant finding of repeated dose toxicity: The NOAEL for local chronic effects in the study described by Til et al. (1972) is represented by the dose of 0.25% metabisulfite. The corrected dose level corresponded to a dose of 108 mg/kg bw/d Na2S2O5. All observed effects (occurrence of occult blood in faeces and changes in gastric morphology) were detected at higher dose levels at and above 0.5% in the diet (220 mg/kg bw/d Na2S2O5). There was no evidence of systemic toxicity following chronic treatment with sodium metabisulfite. Therefore, the NOAEL for systemic effects can be expected above the highest dose of 2% metabisulfite in the diet corresponding to 955 mg/kg bw/d of Na2S2O5.
Therefore, it can be concluded that based on the available animal data, Na2S2O5does not have the potential to produce significant toxicity, or to be harmful to humans, following repeated exposure at low or moderate exposure concentrations relevant for classification. This result can be read across to dipotassium disulfite without restriction.Thus, the requirements for STOT-RE classification criteria according to regulation (EC) 1272/2008 as specific target organ toxicant (STOT) – repeated exposure, oral are not met, and no classification as specific target organ toxicant is required.
Repeated dose toxicity, dermal
(i) Based on physico-chemical properties of dipotassium disulfite and the toxicokinetic behaviour (very limited penetration into the upper epithelial layers of the epidermis,) there are no systemic risks to humans with respect to dermal exposure to this substance.
(ii) One may assume a conservative default of 1% for dermal absorption of dipotassium disulfite, leading to the anticipation of a negligible toxicity via the dermal route.
Thus, it may be concluded that there will be no systemic risks to humans with respect to dermal exposure to dipotassium disulfite, and no classification for specific target organ toxicant (STOT) – repeated exposure, dermal according to regulation (EC) 1272/2008 is required for this substance or any suitable compound for read-across to this compound.
Repeated dose toxicity, inhalation
According to regulation (EC) 1272/2008, a classification for specific target organ toxicity – repeated exposure shall be taken into account only when reliable evidence associating repeated exposure to the substance with a consistent and identifiable toxic effect demonstrates support for the classification. However, there is no data or information available to evaluate a potential for specific organ toxicity following repeated inhalation exposure, and thus classification is not required.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.