Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 210-638-3 | CAS number: 620-40-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
It was concluded that with and without addition of S9 mix as the exogenous metabolizing system, the test item was not mutagenic in this Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli reverse mutation test (reference 7.6.1-1).
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2020-09-29 to 2020-10-15
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 21st July 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- 30 May 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Salmonella typhimurium: the strains used contain mutations in the histidine operon
Escherichia coli: the strain used carries a defect in one of the genes for tryptophan biosynthesis - Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
- source of S9 : liver S9 mix from rats pretreated with ß-Naphthoflavone/Phenobarbital
- method of preparation of S9 mix: The complete S9 Mix was prepared with components: sodium phosphate-buffer 0.5 mL + Rat liver homogenate (S9) 0.1 mL (1st series) or 0.2 mL (2nd series) + Magnesium Chloride/ potassium Chloride Solution (0.4 M/1.64 M) 0.02 mL + Glucose-6-phosphate x 1 H2O, disodium salt 1.61 mg + Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate, disodium salt 3.15 mg + ultra-pure water 0.38 mL (1st series) or 0.28 mL (2nd series)
- concentration or volume of S9 mix and S9 in the final culture medium: 10 % and 20 % S9 in the S9 mix were used. 0.5 mL S9 mix were added per plate with metabolic activation.
- quality controls of S9: metabolic capability - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1st series: 5, 15.8, 50, 158, 500, 1580, 5000 µg/plate
2nd series: 15.8, 50, 158, 500, 889 µg/plate
The test material concentrations used were selected according to the EEC, OECD and Japanese guidelines for this test system. Therefore, 5000 µg/plate was chosen as the appropriate maximum test material concentration. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Solvent used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent: The selection of the solvent for this assay was based on the available information from a prelimi-nary solubility test. DMSO showed best Performance and was thus used for this experiment at a maximum concentration of 100 µL/plate.
- Justification for percentage of solvent in the final culture medium: Analysis of the historical data and independent experiments of the laboratory, and experience of other research groups showed that the chosen amounts of the selected solvents have no influence on the spontaneous mutation rate of the bacteria used. For this reason, no untreated controls were used. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- sodium azide
- other: 4-Nitro-o-phenylenediamine (4-NOPD), 2-Aminoanthracene (2-AA)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: triplicate
- Number of independent experiments : 2
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Test substance added in agar (plate incorporation)
TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: 2 days
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: background growth inhibition - Evaluation criteria:
- The assay is considered valid if the following criteria were met:
• Regular background growth in the negative control
• The mean number of revertants in the negative (solvent) controls are within the normal range for this test system taking published ranges and the current historical data of the laboratory into account, and
• The positive control chemicals should induce an increase the mean number of revertants above a threshold of 2-fold (TA98, TA100, WP2 uvrA) or 3-fold (TA1535, TA1537) as compared to the concurrent negative controls
• A minimum of five analyzable concentrations, at least three of them without showing signs of toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants below a factor of 0.5 compared to the concurrent negative control, should be present.
A test material was to be defined as positive or mutagenic in this assay if
• the assay is considered valid and
• a biologically relevant increase in the mean number of revertants above a threshold of 2-fold (TA98, TA 100, WP2 uvrA) or 3-fold (TA1535, TA 1537) as compared to the concurrent negative controls is observed
• an increase exceeding the threshold at only one concentration is considered as biologically meaningful if reproduced in a second independent experiment
• a concentration-dependent increase is considered biologically meaningful if the threshold is exceeded at more than one concentration
A test material is defined as negative or non-mutagenic in this assay if
• the assay is considered valid and
• none of the above-mentioned criteria are met
Whenever colony counts remain within the historical range of negative controls, such increases are considered as biologically not meaningful. In general, two series of experiments must be performed. However, there is no requirement for verification of a clear positive response. - Statistics:
- Tables of individual and mean values were generated by use of a validated, automated data processing program ("Ames Study Manager" and modules by Instem, Stone, Staffordshire, UK, TOXID8004).
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: Precipitation of the test material on the agar plates occurred at concentrations > 500 µg/plate.
- Other confounding effects: No other effects observed.
STUDY RESULTS
- Concurrent vehicle negative and positive control data : Please refer to "Any other information on results".
Ames test:
- Signs of toxicity : No toxicity to the bacteria was observed with the exception of one occasion in TAI 537 at 5000 ug/plate (without S9 mix).
- Please refer to "Any other information on results" for values.
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA
- Please refer to "Any other information on results" for values. - Conclusions:
- It was concluded that with and without addition of S9 mix as the exogenous metabolizing system, the test item was not mutagenic in this Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli reverse mutation test.
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to investigate the test material for its mutagenic potential in a bacterial reverse mutation test in the absence and presence of a rat liver metabolizing system (S9 mix) according to OECD 471. The investigations for the mutagenic potential of the test item were performed using Salmonella typhimurium tester strains TA98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537 and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA. The plate incorporation test with and without addition of liver S9 mix from rats pre-treated with ß-Naphthoflavone/Phenobarbital was used. In this study, two experimental series were performed. The S9 mix used contained 10 % S9 in the 1st and 20 % S9 in the 2nd series, respectively. Solvent and positive control treatments were included for all strains. The mean numbers of revertant colonies were all within acceptable ranges for solvent control treatments, or were clearly elevated by positive control treatments, thus, showing the expected reversion properties of all strains and good metabolic activity of the S9 mix used. Following treatment of all bacteria tester strains with the test item in the absence and presence of S9 mix, no relevant increases in revertant numbers were observed. Precipitation of the test material on the agar plates occurred at concentrations > 500 µg/plate. No toxicity to the bacteria was observed with the exception of one occasion in TAI 537 at 5000 µg/plate (without S9 mix). Under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce gene mutations by base-pair or frameshift changes in the genome of the strains used. Therefore, it was concluded that with and without addition of S9 mix as the exogenous metabolizing system, the test item was not mutagenic in this Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli reverse mutation test.
Reference
1st series:
Dose (µg/plate) | Mean number of revertant colonies/3 replicate plates (± S.D.) with different strains of Salmonella typhimurium and E. coli | ||||
TA98 | TA100 | TA1535 | TA1537 | WP2 uvrA | |
Results without S9 | |||||
DMSO | 36 ± 9 | 125 ± 13 | 33 ± 1 | 14 ± 6 | 31 ± 5 |
5 | 39 ± 3 | 146 ± 20 | 46 ± 14 | 8 ± 4 | 24 ± 6 |
15.8 | 36 ± 12 | 147 ± 4 | 68 ± 8 | 13 ± 6 | 26 ± 4 |
50 | 46 ± 8 | 133 ± 23 | 75 ± 7 | 14 ± 1 | 22 ± 8 |
158 | 39 ± 4 | 108 ± 4 | 82 ± 22 | 11 ± 4 | 25 ± 4 |
500 | 35 ± 6 ME | 95 ± 9 ME | 75 ± 13 ME | 8 ± 3 ME | 24 ± 2 ME |
1580 | 38 ± 14ME | 101 ± 8 ME | 77 ± 11 ME | 8 ± 3 ME | 19 ± 1 ME |
5000 | 30 ± 2ME | 98 ± 6 ME | 56 ± 4 ME | 6 ± 1 ME | 22 ± 3 ME |
4-NOPD (20) | 225 ± 25 | ||||
4-NOPD (60) | 82 ± 4 | ||||
NaN3 (2) | 1105 ± 27 | 920 ± 11 | |||
NQO (2) | 1521 ± 119 | ||||
Results with S9 | |||||
DMSO | 45 ± 4 | 119 ± 24 | 12 ± 3 | 9 ± 4 | 36 ± 5 |
5 | 38 ± 1 | 111 ± 5 | 9 ± 3 | 13 ± 4 | 30 ± 7 |
15.8 | 44 ± 10 | 115 ± 6 | 7 ± 3 | 11 ± 4 | 23 ± 4 |
50 | 41 ± 5 | 116 ± 8 | 11 ± 2 | 11 ± 4 | 27 ± 2 |
158 | 39 ± 8 | 104 ± 7 | 9 ± 3 | 10 ± 3 | 26 ± 4 |
500 | 36 ± 6 ME | 94 ± 4 ME | 7 ± 2 ME | 9 ± 2 ME | 20 ± 10 ME |
1580 | 35 ± 5 ME | 81 ± 4 ME | 8 ± 3 ME | 7 ± 4 ME | 20 ± 8 ME |
5000 | 29 ± 8 ME | 74 ± 9 ME | 9 ± 3 ME | 6 ± 1 ME | 24 ± 7 ME |
2-AA (2) | 902 ± 83 | 1531 ± 51 | |||
2-AA (5) | 256 ± 23 | 488 ± 105 | |||
2-AA (10.0) | 320 ± 32 |
2nd series:
Dose (µg/plate) | Mean number of revertant colonies/3 replicate plates (± S.D.) with different strains of Salmonella typhimurium and E. coli | ||||
TA98 | TA100 | TA1535 | TA1537 | WP2 uvrA | |
Results without S9 | |||||
DMSO | 42 ± 2 | 108 ± 7 | 13 ± 3 | 16 ± 3 | 34 ± 4 |
15.8 | 35 ± 6 | 114 ± 29 | 21 ± 0 | 20 ± 3 | 21 ± 4 |
50 | 44 ± 7 | 113 ± 13 | 22 ± 5 | 13 ± 4 | 32 ± 5 |
158 | 33 ± 3 | 90 ± 4 | 23 ± 1 | 15 ± 2 | 35 ± 1 |
500 | 30 ± 8 ME | 84 ± 8 ME | 18 ± 3 ME | 12 ± 3 ME | 24 ± 6 ME |
889 | 33 ± 8 ME | 88 ± 2 ME | 16 ± 3 ME | 12 ± 3 ME | 26 ± 7 ME |
4-NOPD (20) | 505 ± 23 | ||||
4-NOPD (60) | 108 ± 4 | ||||
NaN3 (2) | 1955 ± 92 | 1193 ± 76 | |||
NQO (2) | 2007 ± 88 | ||||
Results with S9 | |||||
DMSO | 45 ± 6 | 131 ± 15 | 16 ± 3 | 16 ± 3 | 40 ± 3 |
15.8 | 54 ± 16 | 120 ± 5 | 18 ± 5 | 25 ± 2 | 34 ± 6 |
50 | 42 ± 1 | 144 ± 15 | 13 ± 5 | 18 ± 4 | 36 ± 4 |
158 | 53 ± 10 | 122 ± 25 | 15 ± 7 | 18 ± 2 | 32 ± 7 |
500 | 36 ± 2 ME | 100 ± 13 ME | 10 ± 2 ME | 11 ± 2 ME | 27 ± 6 ME |
889 | 36 ± 6 ME | 105 ± 17 ME | 12 ± 1 ME | 9 ± 1 ME | 25 ± 1 ME |
2-AA (2) | 579 ± 45 | 1057 ± 38 | |||
2-AA (5) | 225 ± 16 | 191 ± 83 | |||
2-AA (10.0) | 297 ± 8 |
E= Precipitation until end of experiment
M= Manual count
Historical Data
The historical data have been obtained in experiments between 01/2019 and 12/2019.
Negative Controls
Strain |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
||
S9 Mix |
Without |
With |
Without |
With |
Compound |
Solvent |
Solvent |
Solvent |
Solvent |
Total Plates |
424 |
424 |
420 |
416 |
Number of Values |
87 |
87 |
86 |
85 |
Minimum |
8 |
10 |
85 |
93 |
Maximum |
49 |
52 |
141 |
172 |
Mean |
33 |
39 |
112 |
128 |
Standard Deviation |
6.7 |
7.7 |
12.5 |
15.3 |
Strain |
TA 1535* |
T A 1537 |
WP2 uvrA |
|||
S9 Mix |
Without |
With |
Without |
With |
Without |
With |
Compound |
Solvent |
Solvent |
Solvent |
Solvent |
Solvent |
Solvent |
Total Plates |
268 |
268 |
272 |
272 |
416 |
416 |
Number of Values |
48 |
48 |
49 |
49 |
85 |
85 |
Minimum |
22 |
9 |
5 |
6 |
24 |
25 |
Maximum |
45 |
53 |
19 |
16 |
45 |
55 |
Mean |
31 |
28 |
10 |
11 |
32 |
37 |
Standard Deviation |
5.0 |
7.2 |
2.7 |
2.6 |
4.5 |
6.5 |
Positive Controls
Strain |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
|
|||
S9 Mix |
Without |
With |
Without |
With |
||
Compound |
DAUN |
4-NOPD |
2-AA |
NaN3 |
2-AA |
|
Total Plates |
90 |
127 |
217 |
215 |
213 |
|
Number of Values |
35 |
52 |
87 |
86 |
85 |
|
Minimum |
86 |
68 |
73 |
871 |
354 |
|
Maximum |
1414 |
726 |
5113 |
2224 |
5269 |
|
Mean |
524 |
446 |
801 |
1654 |
1816 |
|
Standard Deviation |
337.2 |
115.1 |
665.7 |
281.1 |
1037.5 |
|
Strain |
T A 1535 |
TA 1537 |
WP2 uvrA |
||||
S9 Mix |
Without |
With |
Without |
With |
Without |
With |
|
Compound |
NaN3 |
2-AA |
9-AA |
4-NOPD |
2-AA |
NQO |
2-AA |
Total Plates |
139 |
139 |
62 |
79 |
141 |
213 |
213 |
Number of Values |
48 |
48 |
21 |
28 |
49 |
85 |
85 |
Minimum |
620 |
79 |
104 |
70 |
69 |
386 |
99 |
Maximum |
1427 |
273 |
3715 |
123 |
799 |
2661 |
729 |
Mean |
947 |
184 |
897 |
99 |
374 |
1611 |
298 |
Standard Deviation |
160.4 |
49.5 |
930.4 |
12.6 |
198.1 |
415.9 |
107.4 |
*ln the present study, TA1535 of a different origin was used which has a generally lower spontaneous mutation frequency as com-pared to the TA1535 strain used to generate the historical control data.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
A study was conducted to investigate the test material for its mutagenic potential in a bacterial reverse mutation test in the absence and presence of a rat liver metabolizing system (S9 mix) according to OECD 471. The investigations for the mutagenic potential of the test item were performed using Salmonella typhimurium tester strains TA98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537 and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA. The plate incorporation test with and without addition of liver S9 mix from rats pre-treated with ß-Naphthoflavone/Phenobarbital was used. In this study, two experimental series were performed. The S9 mix used contained 10 % S9 in the 1st and 20 % S9 in the 2nd series, respectively. Solvent and positive control treatments were included for all strains. The mean numbers of revertant colonies were all within acceptable ranges for solvent control treatments, or were clearly elevated by positive control treatments, thus, showing the expected reversion properties of all strains and good metabolic activity of the S9 mix used. Following treatment of all bacteria tester strains with the test item in the absence and presence of S9 mix, no relevant increases in revertant numbers were observed. Precipitation of the test material on the agar plates occurred at concentrations > 500 µg/plate. No toxicity to the bacteria was observed with the exception of one occasion in TAI 537 at 5000 µg/plate (without S9 mix). Under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce gene mutations by base-pair or frameshift changes in the genome of the strains used. Therefore, it was concluded that with and without addition of S9 mix as the exogenous metabolizing system, the test item was not mutagenic in this Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli reverse mutation test.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available data is reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. Based on available data on genotoxicity, the test item does not require classification according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP), as amended for the fifteenth time in Regulation (EU) No 2020/1182.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.