Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2020-06-09 to 2020-09-02
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2020
Report date:
2020

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
Version / remarks:
adopted 09 October 2017
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
(2R)-3-amino-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-1,1-difluoro-1-{5-[4-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)phenyl]pyridin-2-yl}propan-2-ol; (2R,3R)-2,3-dihydroxybutanedioic acid
EC Number:
845-262-4
Cas Number:
1809816-36-1
Molecular formula:
C22H17F7N2O2 . C4H6O6
IUPAC Name:
(2R)-3-amino-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-1,1-difluoro-1-{5-[4-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)phenyl]pyridin-2-yl}propan-2-ol; (2R,3R)-2,3-dihydroxybutanedioic acid
Test material form:
solid
Details on test material:
- CAS: 1809816-36-1
- Content (q-NMR): 99.9% w/w
- Content (HPLC): 99.5% area
- Appearance: White solid
- Storage conditions: Ambient temperature (10 °C to 30 °C)
- Expiry date: December 2020
Specific details on test material used for the study:
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Treatment of test material prior to testing: No correction was made for the purity/composition of the test item. Since no workable suspension of the test item in physiological saline could be obtained, the test item was used as delivered by the sponsor and added pure on top of the corneas.

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
cattle
Strain:
not specified
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
SOURCE OF COLLECTED EYES
- Source: obtained from the slaughterhouse (Vitelco, 's Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands), where the eyes were excised by a slaughterhouse employee as soon as possible after slaughter.
- Number of animals: no data
- Characteristics of donor animals (e.g. age, sex, weight): no data
- Transport conditions of ocular tissue: Eyes were collected and transported in physiological saline in a suitable container under cooled conditions and tested the day of arrival in the laboratory.
- Storage: The isolated corneas were stored in a petri dish with cMEM (Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (Life Technologies, Bleiswijk, The Netherlands) containing 1% (v/v) L-glutamine (Life Technologies) and 1% (v/v) Fetal Bovine Serum (Life Technologies)). The isolated corneas were mounted in a corneal holder (one cornea per holder) of Duratec
Analysentechnik GmbH (Hockenheim, Germany) with the endothelial side against the O-ring of the posterior half of the holder. The anterior half of the holder was positioned on top of the cornea and tightened with screws. The compartments of the corneal holder were filled with cMEM of 32 +/- 1 °C. The corneas were incubated for the minimum of 1 hour at 32 +/- 1 °C.
- Time interval prior to initiating testing: Immediately after arrival of the eyes, cornea preparation was initiated.
- Indication of any existing defects or lesions in ocular tissue samples: The eyes were checked for unacceptable defects, such as opacity, scratches, pigmentation and neovascularization by removing them from the physiological saline and holding them in the light. Those exhibiting defects were discarded.
- Indication of any antibiotics used: no data

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent positive control
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 750 µL
Duration of treatment / exposure:
240 +/- 10 min at 32 ± 1 °C
Observation period (in vivo):
n.a.
Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
Opacity measurements were performed before and directly after exposure. The optical density at 490 nm was measured upon 90 minutes of incubation with fluorescein after exposure to the test item by using a spectrophotometer.
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
Three corneas each for the test item, negative control (physiological saline 0.9% NaCl) and positive control (20% imidazole in physiological saline 0.9 NaCl%).
Details on study design:
SELECTION AND PREPARATION OF CORNEAS / QUALITY CHECK OF THE ISOLATED CORNEAS
The eyes were checked for unacceptable defects, such as opacity, scratches, pigmentation and neovascularization by removing them from the physiological saline and holding them in the light. Those exhibiting defects were discarded. The isolated corneas were stored in a petri dish with cMEM (Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (Life Technologies, Bleiswijk, The Netherlands) containing 1% (v/v) L-glutamine (Life Technologies) and 1% (v/v) Fetal Bovine Serum (Life Technologies)). The isolated corneas were mounted in a corneal holder (one cornea per holder) of Duratec Analysentechnik GmbH (Hockenheim, Germany) with the endothelial side against the O-ring of the posterior half of the holder. The anterior half of the holder was positioned on top of the cornea and tightened with screws. The compartments of the corneal holder were filled with cMEM of 32 +/- 1 °C. The corneas were incubated for the minimum of 1 hour at 32 +/- 1 °C.

APPLICATION DOSE AND EXPOSURE TIME
750 μL of the test substance or the control substance was introduced into the anterior chamber. After 240 +/- 10 minutes incubation at 32 ± 1 °C either the test substance or the control substance was removed and the epithelium washed at least three times with MEM (containing phenol red).

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Number of washing steps after exposure period: The epithelium was washed at least three times with MEM (containing phenol red)

POST-EXPOSURE INCUBATION:
Following the final opacity measurement, permeability of the cornea to Na-fluorescein (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) was evaluated. The medium of both compartments (anterior compartment first) was removed. The posterior compartment was refilled with fresh cMEM. The anterior compartment was filled with 1 mL of 5 mg Na-fluorescein/mL cMEM solution (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Germany). The holders were slightly rotated, with the corneas maintained in a horizontal position, to ensure uniform distribution of the sodium-fluorescein solution over the entire cornea. Corneas were incubated in a horizontal position for 90 +/- 5 minutes at 32 +/- 1 °C.

METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS:
- The optical density was determined at 490 nm (OD490) using a spectrophotometer.

SCORING SYSTEM: In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS)
IVIS = mean opacity value + (15 x mean permeability OD490 value)

DECISION CRITERIA:
- IVIS ≤ 3: UN GHS No Category
- IVIS > 3 to ≤ 55: No prediction can be made
- IVIS > 55: UN GHS Category 1

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
mean (triplicates)
Value:
191
Vehicle controls validity:
not examined
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: According to the UN GHS, this IVIS indicates that the test item induces serious eye damage
Other effects / acceptance of results:
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: yes, the negative control responses for opacity and permeability were less than the upper limits of the laboratory historical range indicating that the negative control did not induce irritancy on the corneas.
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: yes, the mean in vitro irritancy score of the positive control (20% (w/v) Imidazole) was 137 and within two standard deviations of the current historical positive control mean.

For details on the results please refer to box "Any other information on results incl. tables".

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 2: Summary of Opacity, Permeability and In Vitro Scores

Treatment

Mean

Opacity

Mean

Permeability

Mean In vitro Irritation Score (1), (2)

Negative control

1.3

0.007

1.4

Positive control

117

1.310

137

Test item

134

3.749

191

(1) Calculated using the negative control corrected mean opacity and mean permeability values for the positive control and test item.

(2) In vitro irritancy score (IVIS) = mean opacity value + (15 x mean OD490 value).

Table 3: In vitro Irritation Score (IVIS)

Treatment

Final Opacity (2)

Final OD490

(2)

In vitro Irritancy Score (1)

Negative control

0.2

0.005

0.2

1.1

0.003

1.1

2.7

0.013

2.9

Positive control

137

1.146

154

106

1.404

127

108

1.381

129

Test item

149

5.021

225

135

2.651

175

118

3.575

172

(1) In vitro irritancy score (IVIS) = opacity value + (15 x OD490 value).

(2) Positive control and test item are corrected for the negative control.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
In conclusion, based on the mean in vitro irritation score of 191 obtained in the bovine corneal opacity and permeability assay (OECD 437), it is concluded that the test item induces serious eye damage in the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability test under the experimental conditions described above and should be classified category 1 according to the UN GHS criteria.
Executive summary:

The eye irritation potential of R)-3-Amino-2-(2,4 - difluorophenyl)-1,1-difluoro-1-(5-(4-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)phenyl)pyridin-2-yl)propan-2-ol L-tartrate (99.5% purity) was investigated in the bovine corneal opacity and permeability assay (OECD 437). The mean in vitro irritation score was determined with 191 after a 4-hour treatment. The positive control induced the appropriate responses, indicating the validity of the assay. In conclusion, since the test item induced an IVIS ≥ 55, it is concluded that the test item induces serious eye damage in the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability test under the experimental conditions described and should be classified as Eye Dam. 1, H318 in accordance with the CLP Regulation 1272/2008.