Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 947-579-4 | CAS number: 1449104-34-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 09-03-2018 to 10-04-2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study performed under GLP. All relevant validity criteria were met.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 018
- Report date:
- 2018
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- Version / remarks:
- Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare and Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (24 November 2000)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- inspected: July 2017 ; signature: November 2017
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- (4E)-5-cyclohexyl-2,4-dimethylpent-4-enal
- EC Number:
- 947-579-4
- Cas Number:
- 1449104-34-0
- Molecular formula:
- C13H22O
- IUPAC Name:
- (4E)-5-cyclohexyl-2,4-dimethylpent-4-enal
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Details on test material:
- - Physical state: Liquid
- Storage condition of test material: approximately 4ºC, in the dark, under nitrogen
- Other: clear colourless
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- histidine or tryptophan locus
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1 (pre-incubation method): 0, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate
Part of the first mutation test was repeated due to excessive toxicity (TA-strains dosed in the absence of S9-mix) employing an amended test item dose range of 0.015 to 50 µg/plate. Specifically: 0.015, 0.05, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, and 15 µg/plate.
Experiment 2 (pre-incubation method): Up to eight test item dose levels were selected in Experiment 2 in order to achieve both a minimum of four non-toxic doses and the toxic/guideline limit of the test item. The dose levels were selected based on the results of Experiment 1.
Salmonella strains (All); TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 (absence of S9-mix): 0.015, 0.05, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50 µg/plate.
Salmonella strains TA100 and TA1537 (presence of S9-mix): 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500 µg/plate.
Salmonella strains TA1535 (presence of S9-mix): 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 µg/plate.
Salmonella strain TA98 (presence of S9-mix): 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 µg/plate.
E.coli strain WP2uvrA (absence and presence of S9-mix): 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 µg/plate. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test item was immiscible in sterile distilled water at 50 mg/mL but was fully miscible in dimethyl sulphoxide at the same concentration in solubility checks performed. Dimethyl sulphoxide was selected as the vehicle.
- Other: Formulated concentrations were adjusted/increased to allow for the stated water/impurity content. See 'Test Material Information' for further details.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation S9
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation S9
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: Experiment 1. in medium; in agar (pre-incubation) ; Experiment 2. in medium; in agar (pre-incubation).
The choice of application was due to the test item to either have unknown volatility or was suspected to be volatile, therefore all testing was performed using the pre-incubation method (20 minutes at 37 ± 3 °C) except for the untreated controls.
DURATION
- Exposure duration:
Experiment 1. All of the plates were pre-incubated in sealed, small volume containers, by application of 0.1 mL of the appropriate bacterial strain culture, 0.5 mL of phosphate buffer OR S9-mix (as appropriate) and 0.1 mL of the test item formulation, vehicle or 0.1 mL of appropriate positive control were incubated at 37 ± 3 ºC for 20 minutes (with shaking) prior to addition of 2 mL of molten amino-acid supplemented media. All of the plates were sealed in anaerobic jars or bags (one jar/bag for each concentration of test item/vehicle) during the incubation procedure (37 ± 3 ºC for approximately 48 to 72 hours) to minimize potential losses of the test item from the plates. After incubation, the plates were scored for the presence of revertant colonies using an automated colony counting system. The plates were viewed microscopically for evidence of thinning (toxicity). Manual counts may be performed, where automated counting cannot be performed: e.g. colonies spreading, colonies on the edge of the plates and artefacts on the plates, thus distorting the actual plate count.
Experiment 2. 0.1 mL of the appropriate bacterial strain culture, 0.5 mL of phosphate buffer OR S9-mix (as appropriate) and 0.1 mL of the test item formulation, vehicle or 0.1 mL of appropriate positive control were incubated at 37 ± 3 ºC for 20 minutes (with shaking) prior to addition of 2 mL of molten amino-acid supplemented media Subsequently, the procedure for incubation and duration was the same as in Experiment 1.
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): histidine-deficient agar
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth - Rationale for test conditions:
- In accordance with the OECD TG 471 guidelines.
- Evaluation criteria:
- There are several criteria for determining a positive result. Any, one, or all of the following can be used to determine the overall result of the study:
1. A dose-related increase in mutant frequency over the dose range tested (De Serres and Shelby, 1979).
2. A reproducible increase at one or more concentrations.
3. Biological relevance against in-house historical control ranges.
4. Fold increase greater than two times the concurrent solvent control for any tester strain (especially if accompanied by an out of historical range response (Cariello and Piegorsch, 1996)).
5. Statistical analysis of data as determined by UKEMS (Mahon et al., 1989).
A test item is considered non-mutagenic (negative) in the test system if the above criteria are not met.
In instances of data prohibiting definitive judgement about test item activity are reported as equivocal. - Statistics:
- Statistical methods (Mahon, et al.); as recommended by the UKEMS Subcommittee on Guidelines for Mutagenicity Testing, Report - Part III (1989).
Statistical significance was confirmed by using Dunnetts Regression Analysis (* = p < 0.05) for those values that indicate statistically significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies compared to the concurrent solvent control.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- See table 1 and 2
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- See table 1 and 2
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation and confidence interval (e.g. 95%)
- Positive historical control data: The current Positive HCD dataset is presented in the full study report.
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: The current background spontaneous revertant counts in concurrent untreated controls and/or or vehicle controls ; historic negative controls are presented in the full study report.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1 : Test Results: Experiment 1 with and without metabolic activation and results of concurrent positive controls
S9-Mix (-) |
Dose Level Per Plate |
Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD |
|||||||||
Base-pair substitution strains |
Frameshift strains |
||||||||||
TA100 † |
TA1535 † |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 † |
TA1537 † |
|||||||
Solvent Control (DMSO) |
118 115 127 |
(120) 6.2# |
11 20 12 |
(14) 4.9 |
33 18 27 |
(26) 7.5 |
22 19 22 |
(21) 1.7 |
16 17 5 |
(13) 6.7 |
|
0.015 µg |
129 119 125 |
(124) 5.0 |
10 14 13 |
(12) 2.1 |
N/T |
24 20 17 |
(20) 3.5 |
8 7 4 |
(6) 2.1 |
||
0.05 µg |
130 128 115 |
(124) 8.1 |
18 7 14 |
(13) 5.6 |
N/T |
14 14 18 |
(15) 2.3 |
8 5 7 |
(7) 1.5 |
||
0.15 µg |
115 109 124 |
(116) 7.5 |
15 10 14 |
(13) 2.6 |
N/T |
22 21 14 |
(19) 4.4 |
8 3 4 |
(5) 2.6 |
||
0.5 µg |
96 116 123 |
(112) 14.0 |
8 8 10 |
(9) 1.2 |
N/T |
19 17 26 |
(21) 4.7 |
3 4 4 |
(4) 0.6 |
||
1.5 µg |
114 136 131 |
(127) 11.5 |
16 8 19 |
(14) 5.7 |
30 24 38 |
(31) 7.0 |
18 13 21 |
(17) 4.0 |
7 3 4 |
(5) 2.1 |
|
5 µg |
105 93 100 |
(99) 6.0 |
12 11 11 |
(11) 0.6 |
25 28 32 |
(28) 3.5 |
16 19 17 |
(17) 1.5 |
7 8 7 |
(7) 0.6 |
|
15 µg |
89 S 88 S 89 S |
(89) 0.6 |
8 S 8 S 5 S |
(7) 1.7 |
28 40 33 |
(34) 6.0 |
17 S 14 S 11 S |
(14) 3.0 |
2 S 3 S 4 S |
(3) 1.0 |
|
50 µg |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
6 S 8 S 12 S |
(9) 3.1 |
40 39 36 |
(38) 2.1 |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
|
150 µg |
N/T |
N/T |
37 34 21 |
(31) 8.5 |
N/T |
N/T |
|||||
500 µg |
N/T |
N/T |
31 32 26 |
(30) 3.2 |
N/T |
N/T |
|||||
1500 µg |
N/T |
N/T |
29 22 24 |
(25) 3.6 |
N/T |
N/T |
|||||
5000 µg |
N/T |
N/T |
34 46 19 |
(33) 13.5 |
N/T |
N/T |
|||||
Positive controls S9-Mix (-) |
Name Dose Level No. of Revertants |
ENNG |
ENNG |
ENNG |
4NQO |
9AA |
|||||
3 µg |
5 µg |
2 µg |
0.2 µg |
80 µg |
|||||||
564 352 374 |
(430) 116.6 |
173 201 213 |
(196) 20.5 |
549 522 443 |
(505) 55.1 |
324 336 341 |
(334) 8.7 |
162 86 224 |
(157) 69.1 |
||
S9-Mix (+) |
Dose Level Per Plate |
Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD |
|||||||||
Base-pair substitution strains |
Frameshift strains |
||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|||||||
Solvent Control (DMSO) |
137 136 131 |
(135) 3.2# |
9 12 15 |
(12) 3.0 |
37 49 47 |
(44) 6.4 |
24 24 26 |
(25) 1.2 |
14 7 12 |
(11) 3.6 |
|
1.5 µg |
131 134 128 |
(131) 3.0 |
14 8 16 |
(13) 4.2 |
49 32 34 |
(38) 9.3 |
24 19 22 |
(22) 2.5 |
7 10 12 |
(10) 2.5 |
|
5 µg |
134 135 138 |
(136) 2.1 |
15 13 6 |
(11) 4.7 |
35 33 40 |
(36) 3.6 |
17 30 36 |
(28) 9.7 |
5 5 5 |
(5) 0.0 |
|
15 µg |
128 129 123 |
(127) 3.2 |
11 10 15 |
(12) 2.6 |
34 39 39 |
(37) 2.9 |
32 28 27 |
(29) 2.6 |
8 13 6 |
(9) 3.6 |
|
50 µg |
110 127 124 |
(120) 9.1 |
9 10 9 |
(9) 0.6 |
53 36 40 |
(43) 8.9 |
27 31 26 |
(28) 2.6 |
7 5 13 |
(8) 4.2 |
|
150 µg |
74 S 93 S 77 S |
(81) 10.2 |
15 12 12 |
(13) 1.7 |
29 50 48 |
(42) 11.6 |
31 21 28 |
(27) 5.1 |
4 S 9 S 10 S |
(8) 3.2 |
|
500 µg |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
10 S 14 S 5 S |
(10) 4.5 |
38 41 40 |
(40) 1.5 |
26 22 26 |
(25) 2.3 |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
|
1500 µg |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
8 S 3 S 4 S |
(5) 2.6 |
38 34 26 |
(33) 6.1 |
20 22 19 |
(20) 1.5 |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
|
5000 µg |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
7 S 7 S 14 S |
(9) 4.0 |
33 32 40 |
(35) 4.4 |
10 S 13 S 14 S |
(12) 2.1 |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
|
Positive controls S9-Mix (+) |
Name Dose Level No. of Revertants |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
BP |
2AA |
|||||
1 µg |
2 µg |
10 µg |
5 µg |
2 µg |
|||||||
1855 1919 2034 |
(1936) 90.7 |
333 319 289 |
(314) 22.5 |
229 231 232 |
(231) 1.5 |
105 126 146 |
(126) 20.5 |
346 364 367 |
(359) 11.4 |
† Experimental procedure repeated at a later date due to toxicity in the original test
ENNG N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
4NQO 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide
9AA 9-Aminoacridine
BP Benzo(a)pyrene
2AA 2-Aminoanthracene
N/T Not tested at this dose level
S Sparse bacterial background lawn
V Very weak bacterial background lawn
# Standard deviation
Table 2 : Test Results: Experiment 2 with and without metabolic activation and results of concurrent positive controls
S9-Mix (-) |
Dose Level Per Plate |
Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD |
|||||||||
Base-pair substitution strains |
Frameshift strains |
||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|||||||
Solvent Control (DMSO) |
102 114 115 |
(110) 7.2# |
9 9 13 |
(10) 2.3 |
34 20 21 |
(25) 7.8 |
21 17 16 |
(18) 2.6 |
10 6 7 |
(8) 2.1 |
|
0.015 µg |
107 115 126 |
(116) 9.5 |
8 9 9 |
(9) 0.6 |
N/T |
15 25 18 |
(19) 5.1 |
9 6 7 |
(7) 1.5 |
||
0.05 µg |
108 126 116 |
(117) 9.0 |
7 10 11 |
(9) 2.1 |
N/T |
21 20 15 |
(19) 3.2 |
9 5 5 |
(6) 2.3 |
||
0.15 µg |
117 133 118 |
(123) 9.0 |
14 10 6 |
(10) 4.0 |
N/T |
20 13 26 |
(20) 6.5 |
11 12 8 |
(10) 2.1 |
||
0.5 µg |
87 111 116 |
(105) 15.5 |
10 6 9 |
(8) 2.1 |
N/T |
14 18 12 |
(15) 3.1 |
9 7 3 |
(6) 3.1 |
||
1.5 µg |
123 123 128 |
(125) 2.9 |
7 8 13 |
(9) 3.2 |
N/T |
15 19 15 |
(16) 2.3 |
6 5 3 |
(5) 1.5 |
||
5 µg |
90 100 95 |
(95) 5.0 |
11 8 9 |
(9) 1.5 |
N/T |
11 21 21 |
(18) 5.8 |
12 10 5 |
(9) 3.6 |
||
15 µg |
82 S 87 S 83 S |
(84) 2.6 |
12 S 15 S 7 S |
(11) 4.0 |
28 29 23 |
(27) 3.2 |
22 S 18 S 18 S |
(19) 2.3 |
6 S 5 S 5 S |
(5) 0.6 |
|
50 µg |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
6 S 8 S 12 S |
(9) 3.1 |
37 29 22 |
(29) 7.5 |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
|
150 µg |
N/T |
N/T |
31 25 21 |
(26) 5.0 |
N/T |
N/T |
|||||
500 µg |
N/T |
N/T |
26 28 29 |
(28) 1.5 |
N/T |
N/T |
|||||
1500 µg |
N/T |
N/T |
26 33 30 |
(30) 3.5 |
N/T |
N/T |
|||||
5000 µg |
N/T |
N/T |
21 30 29 |
(27) 4.9 |
N/T |
N/T |
|||||
Positive controls S9-Mix (-) |
Name Dose Level No. of Revertants |
ENNG |
ENNG |
ENNG |
4NQO |
9AA |
|||||
3 µg |
5 µg |
2 µg |
0.2 µg |
80 µg |
|||||||
405 464 409 |
(426) 33.0 |
1268 1403 1552 |
(1408) 142.1 |
428 444 367 |
(413) 40.6 |
351 343 348 |
(347) 4.0 |
117 123 104 |
(115) 9.7 |
||
S9-Mix (+) |
Dose Level Per Plate |
Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD |
|||||||||
Base-pair substitution strains |
Frameshift strains |
||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|||||||
Solvent Control (DMSO) |
109 130 119 |
(119) 10.5# |
11 13 19 |
(14) 4.2 |
41 32 35 |
(36) 4.6 |
29 23 31 |
(28) 4.2 |
10 10 15 |
(12) 2.9 |
|
0.15 µg |
119 130 127 |
(125) 5.7 |
N/T |
N/T |
N/T |
7 11 9 |
(9) 2.0 |
||||
0.5 µg |
112 110 113 |
(112) 1.5 |
8 10 12 |
(10) 2.0 |
N/T |
N/T |
12 7 8 |
(9) 2.6 |
|||
1.5 µg |
107 145 124 |
(125) 19.0 |
13 6 17 |
(12) 5.6 |
N/T |
N/T |
13 6 10 |
(10) 3.5 |
|||
5 µg |
120 129 131 |
(127) 5.9 |
14 10 7 |
(10) 3.5 |
N/T |
27 21 24 |
(24) 3.0 |
4 13 5 |
(7) 4.9 |
||
15 µg |
114 128 114 |
(119) 8.1 |
8 11 4 |
(8) 3.5 |
38 37 27 |
(34) 6.1 |
26 27 28 |
(27) 1.0 |
16 17 12 |
(15) 2.6 |
|
50 µg |
104 124 106 |
(111) 11.0 |
12 12 10 |
(11) 1.2 |
41 38 33 |
(37) 4.0 |
27 19 23 |
(23) 4.0 |
12 8 11 |
(10) 2.1 |
|
150 µg |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
8 15 7 |
(10) 4.4 |
43 36 29 |
(36) 7.0 |
18 18 14 |
(17) 2.3 |
8 S 10 S 8 S |
(9) 1.2 |
|
500 µg |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
8 S 7 S 9 S |
(8) 1.0 |
39 29 31 |
(33) 5.3 |
13 18 27 |
(19) 7.1 |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
|
1500 µg |
N/T |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
30 31 41 |
(34) 6.1 |
20 10 11 |
(14) 5.5 |
N/T |
|||
5000 µg |
N/T |
N/T |
39 26 51 |
(39) 12.5 |
10 S 17 S 27 S |
(18) 8.5 |
N/T |
||||
Positive controls S9-Mix (+) |
Name Dose Level No. of Revertants |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
BP |
2AA |
|||||
1 µg |
2 µg |
10 µg |
5 µg |
2 µg |
|||||||
1863 1914 1789 |
(1855) 62.9 |
312 341 327 |
(327) 14.5 |
162 177 235 |
(191) 38.6 |
104 106 132 |
(114) 15.6 |
275 233 250 |
(253) 21.1 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results:
negative
Under the conditions of this study the test item was considered to be non-mutagenic in the presence and absence of S9 activation. - Executive summary:
The study was performed to the requirements of OECD Guideline 471, EU Method B13/14, US EPA OCSPP 870.5100 and Japanese guidelines for bacterial mutagenicity testing under GLP, to evaluate the potential mutagenicity of the test item in a bacterial reverse mutation assay using S.typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E.coli strain WP2uvrA- in both the presence and absence of S-9 mix. The test strains were treated with the test item using the Ames pre incubation method at up to eight dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolizing system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors). The dose range for Experiment 1 was predetermined and was 1.5 to 5000 µg/plate. Part of the first mutation test was repeated due to excessive toxicity (all TA-strains) dosed in the absence of S9-mix employing an amended test item dose range of 0.015 to 50 µg/plate. The experiment was repeated on a separate day using fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test item formulations. Eight test item dose levels were again selected in Experiment 2 in order to achieve a minimum of four non-toxic dose levels and the toxic limit of the test item. The dose range was amended following the results of Experiment 1 and ranged between 0.015 and 5000 µg/plate, depending on bacterial strain type and presence or absence of S9-mix. The vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated. The maximum dose level of the test item in the first experiment was selected as the maximum recommended dose level of 5000 μg/plate or the toxic limit of the test item depending on the strain type and presence of S9-mix.The test item caused a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns of all of the Salmonella strains dosed in the absence of S9-mix from 15 μg/plate. In the presence S9-mix, weakened bacterial background lawns were notedfor all of the Salmonella strains initially from 150 μg/plate. No toxicity was noted to Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA at any test item dose level in either the absence or presence S9-mix. In Experiment 2, both the maximum dose level (5000 μg/plate) or the toxic limit was employed as the maximum concentration in the second mutation test, depending on bacterial strain type and presence or absence of S9-mix. The test item induced an identical toxic response to the first experiment with weakened bacterial background lawns noted from 15 μg/plate to all Salmonella strains dosed in the absence and presence of S9-mix. Again, no toxicity was noted to Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA at any test item dose level. No precipitates were observed at any dose level in either the presence or absence of S9-mix. There were no significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9‑mix). It was concluded that, under the conditions of this assay, the test item gave a negative, i.e. non-mutagenic response in S.typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E.coli strain WP2uvrA- in the presence and absence of S-9 mix.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.