Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
developmental toxicity
Type of information:
read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
April-August 2010
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Well conducted study according to GLP
Justification for type of information:
The underlying hypothesis for the read-across is that chelates have the same mode of action based on their ability to chelate, remove or add metal cations to body causing perturbation of body’s micronutrients balance.
The source substance is a chelating agent in a target substance. The only difference between the target and the main source substance is presence of iron (Fe) and potassium (K) cations instead H+ cations. As iron and potassium are an essential macro- and microelements required by all forms of life, is considered not to influence the toxicological activity.
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2011
Report date:
2011

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD 422
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Sodium hydrogen [N,N-bis[2-[bis(carboxymethyl)amino]ethyl]glycinato(5-)]ferrate(2-)
EC Number:
235-627-0
EC Name:
Sodium hydrogen [N,N-bis[2-[bis(carboxymethyl)amino]ethyl]glycinato(5-)]ferrate(2-)
Cas Number:
12389-75-2
Molecular formula:
C14-H18-Fe-N3-O10.H.Na
IUPAC Name:
Iron(3+) ion sodium 5-[bis(carboxylatomethyl)amino]-3-{[bis(carboxylatomethyl)amino]methoxy}pentanoate
Details on test material:
Chemical name: Sodium hydrogen [N,N-bis[2-[bis(carboxymethyl)amino]ethyl]glycinato(5-)]ferrate(2-)
Purity: 11.6% (Fe content)
Batch no: CFC 9883
Expiry date: 1 January 2013

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Deutshland, Sulzfeld, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 5 weeks (females), 6 weeks (males)
- Weight at study initiation: mean weight males ca. 170 g; mean weight females ca. 106 g
- Fasting period before study: not applicable
- Housing: 4 per sex in macrolon cages, with wood shavings as bedding material, and paper strips as environmental enrichment
- Use of restrainers for preventing ingestion (if dermal): not applicable
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad lib
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad lib
- Acclimation period: one week

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22±2 degrees C, reaching a minimum of 19.2 degrees C
- Humidity (%): at least 45% and not exceeding 65%. During several periods, humidity was outside the limits reaching a minimum of 43% and a maximum of 96% during a short period
- Air changes (per hr): ca. 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 7 April to 4 August 2010

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
water
Details on exposure:
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: Weekly, one bottle of test formulation per dose level was prepared. Preparation of the test formulations was performed one day before the first day of the dosing period and at weekly intervals thereafter until completion of the dosing phase of the study. The different concentrations of the test substance in tap water were prepared by stirring on a magnetic stirrer for at least 1h. The pH of the test formulations of groups 2, 3 and 4 were set between pH 6-7 using sodium carbonate (Na2CO3). Subsequently, under continuous stirring, 8 aliquots (7 days plus 1 extra) were taken according to the volume required for each dosing. Aliqouts were stored in a refrigerator in the dark. On each subsequent day, one aliquot for each group was removed from the refrigerator and allowed to equilibrate to ambient temperature. All aliquots were continuously stirred on a magnetic stirrer during the entire administration period in order to maintain the homogeneity of the test substance in the vehicle.
Sodium carbonate was added to all three test formulations to adjust the acidity of the formulations to pH 6-7: it appeared that the amount of test substance used for the preparation of the test solution for the high-dose group did not dissolve unless the pH was adjusted. On the first 2 days of the study, animals of the low- and mid-dose groups were treated with test formulations without the addition of sodium carbonate. From Day 2 onwards, all animals of the low-, mid- and high-dose groups were treated with test formulations with added sodium carbonate. In week 2 of the study, the pH of the test formulations of the low-, mid- and high-dose groups were marginally higher (resp 7.03, 7.05 and 7.06). This also applied for week 8 of the study, regarding test formulations of the low- and mid-dose groups (resp 7.18 and 7.01).

VEHICLE: tap water
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 15, 50 and 150 mg/mL
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 10 mL/kg bw
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
To determine the homogeneity and content of DTPA-FeNaH in gavage liquid, iron was used as a marker for the test item. Iron concentrations in gavage liquid were determined using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES).
The concentrations of iron measured in the gavage liquids prepared on 15 April 2010, 15 June 2010 and 06 July 2010 were ‘close to intended’ (relative difference < 10 %) for all gavage liquids at all dose levels, except for the low-dose level gavage liquids prepared on 15 April 2010 (+10.7%) and the low-, mid- and high-dose level gavage liquids prepared on 06 July 2010 (+10.1%, +11.0% and +13.6%, respectively).
Details on mating procedure:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1
- Length of cohabitation: max 16 days
- Proof of pregnancy: sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- After ... days of unsuccessful pairing replacement of first male by another male with proven fertility: not done.
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: no
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged: individually
- Any other deviations from standard protocol: no
Duration of treatment / exposure:
10 weeks pre-mating, 16 days mating, 3 weeks gestation, and 4 days lactation
Frequency of treatment:
single daily application by gavage
Duration of test:
10 weeks pre-mating, 16 days mating, 3 weeks gestation, up to 4 days of lactation
Doses / concentrations
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
0, 150, 500 and 1500 mg/kg bw
Basis:
actual ingested
No. of animals per sex per dose:
12
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale: based on studies done with EDTA and EDTA-MnNa2
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): computer randomization proportionately to BW

Examinations

Maternal examinations:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: observations outside the home cage were made once weekly; FOB and motor activity were assessed in week 8 of the pre-mating period.

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: weekly (males and females) and on day 1 and 4 of lactation (females)

FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes
- Food consumption for each animal determined: weekly (at same time as measurement of bw)

WATER CONSUMPTION: No

URINALYSIS: No
Ovaries and uterine content:
The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: No as females were allowed to litter
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes
Fetal examinations:
PARAMETERS EXAMINED
The following parameters were examined in F1 offspring: number and sex of pups, stillbirths, live births, postnatal mortality, presence of gross anomalies, weight gain, physical or behavioural abnormalities and skeletal examinations

GROSS EXAMINATION OF DEAD PUPS:
yes, for external abnormalities
Statistics:
- Clinical findings were evaluated by Fisher's exact probability test.
- Body weight, body weight gain, food consumption and organ weights data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests.
- The total number of pups delivered (mean), the mean number of live pups per litter and pre- and post-implantation loss (%) were evaluated by Kruskal-
Wallis nonparametric analysis of variance and by the Mann-Whitney U test.
- Mortality data and data of the pathology of parent animals were evaluated by the Fisher’s exact probability test.
- Skeletal data of the pups was evaluated by the Fisher's exact probability test.
Indices:
- gestation index = (number of females with live pups or pups/number of females pregnant) x 100
- pre-implantation loss = [(number of corpora lutea – number of implantation sites)/number of corpora lutea] x 100
- number of lost implantations = number of implantations sites - number of pups born alive
- post-implantation loss = [(number of implantation sites - number of pups born alive)/number of implantation sites] x 100

- live birth index = (number of pups born alive/number of pups born) x 100
- viability index day n-m= (number of pup surviving m days/number of liveborn on day n) x100
- pup mortality day n = (number of dead pups on day n/total number of pups on day n) x 100
- sex ratio day n = (number of live male fetuses or pups on day n/ number of live fetuses or pups on day n) x 100
Historical control data:
Not included.

Results and discussion

Results: maternal animals

General toxicity (maternal animals)

Clinical signs:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Soft faeces were observed in males and females of the highdose
groups in various weeks of the pre-mating period . This finding was most pronounced in the first
week of the study. Soft feaces were also observed in some rats of the mid-dose group in the first
week of the study only. The findings in the high-dose group occasionally reached the level of stati
stical significance. The repeated occurrence of soft faeces in the high-dose group was considered t
reatment-related.
Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
not specified
Mortality:
mortality observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence):
One female of the low-dose group (no. 33) was found dead on day 64 of the pre-mating period. In the
fourth week of the study, one female of the mid-dose group (no. 57) showed a hunched body positio
n, piloerection and was thin and weak. On Day 32 of the pre-mating period it was found dead. On Day
3 of the gestation period, a female of the high dose group (no. 85) was killed because it was thin and
showed piloerection and abnormal respiration (rales, dyspnoea, decreased frequency). The death of
females nos 33 and 85 is likely to have been caused by misdosing. The cause of death of
female no. 57 of the mid-dose group could not be examined at necropsy because its organs were alr
eady autolytic.
Body weight and weight changes:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
The mean body weight of males of the high-dose g
roup was decreased when compared to the control group, reaching the level of statistical significan
ce as from Day 35 of the study. In addition, the mean body weight change of males of the high-dose
group was statistically significantly decreased at various time periods (Days 0-7, 28-49, 63-70). These
observed effects on body weight were considered to be related to treatment. Food consumption was
not affected by treatment.
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
no effects observed
Food efficiency:
not examined
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not examined
Ophthalmological findings:
not examined
Haematological findings:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Prothrombin time was increased in males of the high-dose group. Haemoglobin
concentration, mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH) were
statistically significantly increased in males of the high-dose group when compared to controls.
Clinical biochemistry findings:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Alkaline phosphatase activity (ALP) showed a dose-related and statistically
significant decrease in males of the mid- and high-dose groups and in females of all treatment gro
ups. In males of the high-dose group, alanine amino transferase activity (ALAT) was statistically
significantly decreased when compared to controls. The chloride concentration in males of the highdose
group was statistically significantly
decreased.
Urinalysis findings:
not examined
Behaviour (functional findings):
no effects observed
Immunological findings:
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
The relative weights of the kidneys and liver of male and female animals of the
high-dose group were statistically significantly increased. These findings were considered treatmentr
elated. The absolute weight of the epididymides was decreased in males of the mid- and high-dose
group. The relative weight of this organ was decreased in males of the high-dose group but not in
males of the mid-dose group. Therefore, only the decreased weight of the epididymides of males of
the high-dose group was considered to be related to treatment.
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Neuropathological findings:
not specified
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
no effects observed
Other effects:
not specified

Maternal developmental toxicity

Details on maternal toxic effects:
Maternal toxic effects:yes

Details on maternal toxic effects:
soft faeces, decreased ALP activity and increased relative weights of kidneys and liver in animals of the high dose group (see also section 7.5.1)

Effect levels (maternal animals)

open allclose all
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
500 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect level:
other: maternal toxicity
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
>= 1 500 mg/kg bw/day
Based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect level:
other: developmental toxicity

Results (fetuses)

Fetal body weight changes:
no effects observed
Reduction in number of live offspring:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
The mean number of pups per litter was somewhat lower in all treatment groups than in controls but
statistical analysis did not reveal significant differences between groups.
Changes in sex ratio:
no effects observed
Changes in litter size and weights:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Statistical analysis on pup body weights on PN Day 1 and 4 and on pup body weight changes (PN Day 1-4) did not reveal significant differences
between groups.
Changes in postnatal survival:
no effects observed
External malformations:
no effects observed
Skeletal malformations:
no effects observed
Visceral malformations:
no effects observed
Other effects:
no effects observed
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects

Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
No statistically significant differences were found between groups on pup mortality or on sex ratio. The mean number of pups per litter was somewhat lower in all treatment groups than in controls but statistical analysis did not reveal significant differences between groups.
Some abnormalities (subcutaneous heamorrhage, pale, cold and small) were observed occasionally in pups of different groups on lactation Day 1. These abnormalities occurred with the highest incidence in the control group and thus were not ascribed to treatment.
On PN Day 4, the number of thin pups lacking milk in their stomach was statistically significantly increased in the high-dose group when compared to the control group. The 9 pups concerned were from the same litter (dam no. 73). This abnormality is considered to be an indirect effect: the dam lost substantial weight during the lactation period. Statistical analysis on pup body weights on PN Day 1 and 4 and on pup body weight changes (PN Day 1-4) did not reveal significant differences between groups. Stillborn pups of the mid- and high-dose groups and one pup of the high-dose group that died during the lactation period were examined macroscopically. None of the pups showed any remarkable abnormality.
No skeletal malformations or anomalies were found in any of the pups of any groups. Analysis of skeletal variations and retardations did not reveal treatment-related effects. In one pup of each of dam nos 1 (control group), 65 (mid-dose group) and 93 (high-dose group), a hole was observed in the supraoccipital bone.
No statistically significant difference in the incidence of this skeletal varation was observed among the groups. Incomplete ossification of the calcaneus (bilateral) of one pup of dam no. 59 (mid-dose group) was observed. This isolated finding is not ascribed to treatment. Incomplete ossification of cervical bodies was observed in one and three pups of dam nos 1 and 13, respectively, of the control group and in one pup of dam no. 77 of the high-dose group. No statistically significant difference in the incidence of this skeletal retardation was observed. Incomplete ossification of the proximal phalanges of the hindlimbs was observed in allmost all pups of control dams nos 1 and 13 and of high-dose dam no. 73. Statistical analysis showed a decrease in the incidence of incomplete ossification of the proximal phalanges of the hindlimbs in all treatment groups when compared to the control group. This finding is not considered to be related to treatment because the highest incidence of incomplete ossification was found in the control group. It is likely that the (relatively) high incidence of incomplete ossification in allmost all pups of these control dams and high-dose dam, is related to the high number of pups per litter and/or the lower weight of the pups concerned.

Effect levels (fetuses)

Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
>= 1 500 mg/kg bw/day
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
reduction in number of live offspring
changes in sex ratio
fetal/pup body weight changes
changes in litter size and weights
changes in postnatal survival
external malformations
skeletal malformations
visceral malformations

Fetal abnormalities

Abnormalities:
not specified

Overall developmental toxicity

Developmental effects observed:
not specified

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Based on the results of this study, which did not show any toxicological effects of the test substance on development, the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for developmental toxicity is ≥1500 mg/kg body weight/day.
Executive summary:

The objective of this study was to provide data on the possible effects of the test substance DTPA-FeNaH on reproductive performance of Wistar rats and the development of pups following daily oral administration at concentrations of 0, 150, 500 or 1500 mg/kg bw of the test substance by gavage to male and female rats during a pre-mating period of 10 weeks, during mating (16 days), and during gestation and lactation until postnatal Day 4 (PN Day 4); see also section 7.5.1 and 7.8.1.

The homogeneity and content of the test substance in the gavage solutions were confirmed by analysis.

Males and females of the high-dose group showed soft faeces in various weeks of the premating period. Daily clinical observations during the gestation and lactation period did not reveal any treatment-related changes in the animal’s appearance, general condition or behaviour. Mean body weights were decreased in males of the high-dose group from week 5 onwards. There were no treatment-related effects on female body weights during the entire study. No treatment-related effects were observed on food consumption of male and female animals during the entire study.

There were no treatment-related differences in litter size and sex, and pup body weight. Macroscopic examination of the pups at birth and at necropsy, and skeletal analyses of the pups did not reveal any treatment-related changes.

Based on the results of this study, viz. soft faeces (both sexes), decreased body weight gain (males), prolonged prothrombin time (males), increased haemoglobin concentration (males), decreased ALAT activity and chloride concentration (males) and increased relative weights of kidneys and liver (both sexes) as observed in animals treated with the highest concentration of the test substance and decreased alkaline phosphatase activity as observed in males of the mid- and high-dose groups and in females of all dose-groups, the No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) for parental toxicity is <150 mg/kg body weight/day and the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for parental toxicity is 500 mg/kg body weight/day. Based on the results of this study, viz. a decrease in sperm motility, cauda epididymis weight and in sperm reserve, as observed in male animals treated with the highest concentration of the test substance, the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for fertility is 500 mg/kg body weight/day. Based on the results of this study, which did not show any toxicological effects of the test substance on development, the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for developmental toxicity is ≥1500 mg/kg body weight/day.