Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 256-917-3 | CAS number: 51022-74-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The potential of Iotroxic acid (99.95% purity) to induce skin irritation (OECD 439) and eye irritation (OECD 437) was tested in suitable in vitro test methods. Based on the results, the target substance can be considered non-irritant to the skin. By assessing the results from an in vitro eye irritation test ,the target substance can be considered non-irritant to the eye.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2018-01-22 to 2018-05-18
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 28 July 2015
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Treatment of test material prior to testing: Firstly, 25 µL of sterile DPBS were applied to the epidermal surface in order to improve the contact between the powder and the epidermis. Afterwards, 25 mg (39 mg/cm2) of the test item were applied directly atop the EpiDerm tissue using an application spoon avoiding compression of the test item. The test item was spread to match size of the tissue by using a bulb-headed Pasteur pipette - Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Justification for test system used:
- This test uses the EpiDerm™ reconstructed human epidermis model (MatTek) which consists of normal human epidermal keratinocytes (NHEK) and therefore represents in vitro the target organ of the species of interest and closely mimics the biochemical and physiological properties of the upper parts of the human skin, i.e. the epidermis
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on test system:
- RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: EpiDerm™-Standard Model (EPI-200-SIT, MatTek)
- Tissue batch number(s): 25882, 25883
EpiDerm Kit:
The EpiDerm tissues were provided as kits (e.g. EPI-200-SIT, MatTek), consisting of the following components relevant for this study:
1x sealed 24-well plate containing e.g. 24 reconstructed epidermis units (area: 0.63 cm2); each reconstructed epidermis is attached to a cell culture insert and maintained on nutritive agar for transport (Lot No.: 25882, 25883)
2x 24-well plates
8x 6-well plates
1x bottle of assay medium (DMEM-based medium, Lot No.: 021518TMB, 022218ALE)
1x bottle of DPBS Rinse Solution (Lot No.: 092817MGKA)
1x 1 vial 5% SDS Solution (TC-SDS-5%)
25 pieces Nylon Mesh circles (8 mm diameter, 200 µm pore)
TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: 37 ± 1 °C for the first 35 +/- 1 min, afterwards the plates were placed under the sterile flow until 60 +/- 1 min incubation time of the first dosed tissue was over.
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation (if applicable): 37 ± 1 °C
REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS
- Volume and number of washing steps:
the tissues were washed by filling and emptying the inserts 15 times with DPBS using a constant stream in about 1.5 cm distance from the tissue surface. Subsequently, the inserts were completely submerged three times in 150 mL DPBS and shaken to remove rests of the test item. Finally, the inserts were rinsed once from the inside and the outside with sterile DPBS. Excess DPBS was removed by blotting the bottom with blotting paper.
MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 1 mg/mL
- Incubation time: 3 h ± 5 min
- Wavelength: 570 nm
- Filter bandwidth: ± 30 nm
NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES: 3
PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA
- The test substance is considered to be irritant to skin if the viability after exposure and 42 h post-treatment incubation is less than or equal to 50%.
- The test substance is considered to be non-irritant to skin if the viability after exposure and 42 h post-treatment incubation is greater than 50%. - Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 25 mg + 25 µL DPBS
NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 30 µL DPBS (DPBS; Gibco, Cat. No. 14040-091, Lot No.: 1838067)
POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 30 µL 5% SDS solution (TC-SDS 5%, MatTek, CAS No.: 151-21-3, Lot No: 092817MGKA). - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 60 min +/ 1 min
- Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
- 42 h post-incubation
- Number of replicates:
- 3 tissues per dose group
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- Mean of three tissues
- Value:
- 89.5
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- For detailed results see Table 1 in box "Any other information on results incl. tables".
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- In this study under the given conditions, the test item showed no irritant effects. The relative mean tissue viability after 60 min of exposure and 42 h post-incubation was > 50%. The test item is therefore classified as “non-irritant” in accordance with UN GHS “No Category”.
- Executive summary:
In a primary dermal irritation study conducted according to OECD guideline 439, the EpiDerm™-Model (EPI-200 -SIT,) was topically exposed to Iotroxic acid for 60 mins and 42 h post incubation period. Irritant potential of the test item was predicted from the relative mean tissue viabilities obtained compared to the corresponding negative control tissues concurrently treated with DPBS. The mean relative tissue viability (% negative control) was > 50% (89.5 %). Based on this result, the test item is classified as a non-irritant according to the UN GHS.
Reference
Results of the Pre-Experiments:
The mixture of 25 mg test item per 1 mL MTT medium showed no reduction of MTT compared to the solvent. The mixture did not turn blue/purple. Therefore, NSMTT was determined to be 0%.
The mixture of 25 mg of the test item per 300 µL aqua dest. or per 300 µL isopropanol showed no colouring detectable by unaided eye-assessment. Therefore, NSClivingwas determined to be 0%.
Table 1: Result of the test item Iotroxic acid
Name |
Negative Control |
Positive Control |
Test Item |
||||||
Tissue |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Absolute OD570 |
2.070 |
1.785 |
2.187 |
0.100 |
0.101 |
0.100 |
1.597 |
1.872 |
1.900 |
2.045 |
1.789 |
2.133 |
0.103 |
0.107 |
0.100 |
1.630 |
1.902 |
1.875 |
|
OD570(Blank Corrected) |
2.027 |
1.741 |
2.144 |
0.057 |
0.057 |
0.056 |
1.554 |
1.828 |
1.857 |
2.002 |
1.746 |
2.090 |
0.060 |
0.063 |
0.057 |
1.587 |
1.859 |
1.832 |
|
Mean OD570of the Duplicates (Blank Corrected) |
2.014 |
1.743 |
2.117 |
0.058 |
0.060 |
0.056 |
1.570 |
1.843 |
1.844 |
Total Mean OD570of 3 Replicate Tissues (Blank Corrected) |
1.958* |
0.058 |
1.753 |
||||||
SD OD570 |
0.193 |
0.002 |
0.158 |
||||||
Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
102.9 |
89.0 |
108.1 |
3.0 |
3.1 |
2.9 |
80.2 |
94.1 |
94.2 |
Mean Relative Tissue Viability [%] |
100.0 |
3.0** |
89.5 |
||||||
SD Tissue Viability [%]*** |
9.8 |
0.1 |
8.1 |
||||||
CV [% Viabilities] |
9.8 |
3.2 |
9.0 |
* Blank-corrected mean OD570 nmof the negative control corresponds to 100% absolute tissue viability.
**Mean relative tissue viability of the three positive control tissues is≤ 20%.
*** Standard deviation (SD) obtained from the three concurrently tested tissues is ≤ 18%.
Table 2: Quality Criteria
|
Value |
Cut off |
pass/fail |
Mean Absolute OD570 nmNK |
1.545 |
0.8 ≤ NK ≤ 2.8 |
pass |
Relative Viability [%] PC |
5.0 |
≤ 20% |
pass |
SD Viability[%] |
0.4 -8.1 |
≤ 18% |
pass |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2018-03-13 to 2018-04-19
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted: 09 October 2017
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- cattle
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- SOURCE OF COLLECTED EYES
- Source: The assay uses isolated corneas obtained as a by-product from animals freshly slaughtered at the abattoir A. Moksel AG, Buchloe, Germany
- Number of animals: 3 replicates
- Characteristics of donor animals (e.g. age, sex, weight): No data
- Storage, temperature and transport conditions of ocular tissue (e.g. transport time, transport media and temperature, and other conditions): On the test day, fresh eyes were collected from the slaughterhouse and were transported in HBSS containing Pen/Strep on ice to the laboratories.
- Time interval prior to initiating testing: Immediately after arrival of the eyes, cornea preparation was initiated.
- indication of any existing defects or lesions in ocular tissue samples: The eyes were carefully examined for defects and any defective eyes were discarded.
- Indication of any antibiotics used: No data - Vehicle:
- physiological saline
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 750 µL
- Concentration (if solution): 20%
VEHICLE
- Concentration (if solution): 0.9%
- Lot/batch no. (if required): 17406416 - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hours ± 5 minutes at 32 °C
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- 90 minutes
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- SELECTION AND PREPARATION OF CORNEAS
On the test day, fresh eyes were collected from the slaughterhouse and were transported in HBSS containing Pen/Strep on ice to the laboratories. Immediately after arrival of the eyes, cornea preparation was initiated. The eyes were carefully examined for defects and any defective eyes were discarded. The tissue surrounding the eyeball was carefully pulled away and the cornea was excised leaving a 2 to 3 mm rim of sclera. The isolated corneas were stored in a petri dish containing HBSS. Before the corneas were mounted in corneal holders (Duratec GmbH) with the endothelial side against the O-ring of the posterior chamber, they had been visually examined for defects and any defective cornea had been discarded. The anterior chamber was then positioned on top of the cornea and tightened with screws. The chambers of the corneal holder were then filled with RPMI (without phenol red) containing 1% FBS and 2 mM L-glutamine (complete RPMI). The posterior chamber was always filled first. The corneas were incubated for one hour at 32 ± 1 °C.
NUMBER OF REPLICATES : 3
NEGATIVE CONTROL USED : physiological saline 0.9% NaCl
POSITIVE CONTROL USED : imidazole 20% in physiological saline 0.9% NaCl
APPLICATION DOSE AND EXPOSURE TIME : 750 µL for 4 h ± 5 min
TREATMENT METHOD: Closed chamber method
After the equilibration period, the medium was removed from both chambers and replaced with fresh complete RPMI. An initial measurement was performed on each of the corneas using the opacitometer. Three corneas with illuminance readings approximately equivalent to the median illuminance of all corneas were selected as negative-control corneas. The illuminance of each cornea was read and recorded. Only corneas that had an initial illuminance reading I > I0/1.1651 lux were used for the assay. The medium was removed from the anterior chamber and replaced with the test item or control. 750 µL of the test item preparation or the control substance was introduced into the anterior chamber (closed-chamber method). After 4 hours ± 5 minutes incubation at 32 ± 1 °C either the test substance or the control substance was removed and the epithelium washed at least three times with MEM (containing phenol red). Once the medium was free of test substance, the cornea was finally rinsed with complete RPMI (without phenol red). The anterior chamber was refilled with complete RPMI and an illuminance measurement was performed. Also, each cornea was observed visually and pertinent observations were recorded. After the illuminance measurement was performed, the medium was removed from both chambers of the holder. The posterior chamber was refilled with fresh complete RPMI. 1 mL of a 5 mg/mL sodium fluorescein solution was added to the anterior chamber and the corneas were incubated for 90 minutes at 32 ± 1 °C. Then the medium from the posterior chamber was removed and its optical density at 490 nm (OD490) was determined, using a spectrophotometer (Jenway 6405 UV/VIS).
POST-INCUBATION PERIOD: Yes, 90 minutes
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Number of washing steps after exposure period: 3
SCORING SYSTEM: In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS)
DECISION CRITERIA: see Table 1 under "Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables" - Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Run / experiment:
- Mean of three replicates
- Value:
- 1.41
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not examined
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- Proper conduct of the BCOP was confirmed via a positive response with imidazole and a negative response with 0.9% NaCl. For detailed results please refer to table 2 in box "Any other information on results incl. tables".
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- In this study under the given conditions, Iotroxic acid is classified as a non - irritant under the UN GHS "No Category."
- Executive summary:
In a primary eye irritation study according to OECD 437, 750 µL of the test substance, Iotroxic acid (Purity 99.95 %) was applied to bovine corneas by closed chamber method for 4 hours. The post incubation period was 90 minutes. The in vitro irritation score for the mean of three replicates was found to be 1.41.The in vitro irritation score obtained with the positive control fell within the two standard deviations of the current historical mean and therefore this assay is valid. The negative control responses resulted in opacity and permeability values that are less than the established upper limits for background bovine corneas treated with the respective negative control. Based on these results, the test item is considered a non – irritant under UN GHS “No Category.”
Reference
Table 2: In Vitro Irritation Score
Cornea No. | Test Item | Corrected Opacity | Corrected OD490 Value | IVIS |
1 | Negative Control | 1.03 | 0.013 | 0.94 |
2 | 0.60 | 0.010 | ||
3 | 0.62 | 0.015 | ||
Mean value | 0.75 | 0.013 | ||
1 | Positive Control | 80.24 | 2.127 | 120.11 |
2 | 77.65 | 3.057 | ||
3 | 75.51 | 3.277 | ||
Mean value | 77.80 | 2.821 | ||
1 | Test Item | 1.35 | -0.002 | 1.41 |
2 | 1.79 | 0.005 | ||
3 | 1.12 | -0.006 | ||
Mean value | 1.42 | -0.001 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
The potential of Iotroxic acid (99.95% purity) to induce skin irritation (OECD 439) and eye irritation (OECD 437) was tested in suitable in vitro test methods.
In a primary dermal irritation study conducted according to OECD guideline 439, the EpiDerm™-Model (EPI-200 -SIT) was topically exposed to Iotroxic acid for 60 mins and 42 h post incubation period. Irritant potential of the test item was predicted from the relative mean tissue viabilities obtained compared to the corresponding negative control tissues concurrently treated with DPBS. The mean relative tissue viability (% negative control) was > 50% (89.5 %). Based on this result, the test item is classified as a non-irritant according to the UN GHS.
In a primary eye irritation study according to OECD 437, 750 µL of the test substance, Iotroxic acid (Purity 99.95 %) was applied to bovine corneas by closed chamber method for 4 hours. The post incubation period was 90 minutes. The in vitro irritation score for the mean of three replicates was found to be 1.41. The in vitro irritation score obtained with the positive control fell within the two standard deviations of the current historical mean and therefore this assay is valid. The negative control responses resulted in opacity and permeability values that are less than the established upper limits for background bovine corneas treated with the respective negative control. Based on these results, the test item is considered a non – irritant under UN GHS “No Category.”
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on available data, no classification for skin and/or eye irritation is warranted based on the results from suitable in vitro tests (OECD 439, 437).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.