Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2014-11-20 to 2014-11-21
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2015
Report date:
2014

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 435 (In Vitro Membrane Barrier Test Method for Skin Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Germany

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
(propan-2-yloxy)phosphonic acid; [(diethoxyphosphoryl)oxy](ethoxy)phosphinic acid; bis(propan-2-yloxy)phosphinic acid; methoxyphosphonic acid; phosphoric acid
EC Number:
908-995-1
Molecular formula:
can not be determined for reaction masses
IUPAC Name:
(propan-2-yloxy)phosphonic acid; [(diethoxyphosphoryl)oxy](ethoxy)phosphinic acid; bis(propan-2-yloxy)phosphinic acid; methoxyphosphonic acid; phosphoric acid

In vitro test system

Test system:
artificial membrane barrier model
Source species:
other: Bio-barrier membrane
Details on animal used as source of test system:
n.a.
Justification for test system used:
commonly accepted for classication of corrosive substances to Cat. 1A, 1B or 1C
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on test system:
This assay is composed of three different steps:

1. Qualification
This step ensures that the sample is compatible with the CORROSITEX™ system. 150 µL of the test substance are added to the Qualify test tube. Solids are shaken to dissolve, if necessary. For immiscible liquids and insoluble solids the vial is shaken and let stand for one minute. If the colour or consistency of the CDS changes at the sample/testing fluid interface, the test material is qualified for the assay. If no reaction is observed within five minutes, the sample is not qualified for the CORROSITEX™ Assay.

2. Categorisation
This step establishes the category for cut-off times for the sample. 150 µL of the test substance are added to the tubes labeled Tube A and Tube B. After shaking a colour change in either of the tubes is matched to the corresponding colour charts on the CORROSITEX™ Testing Protocol Poster. Test materials having high acid/alkaline reserves are defined as Category 1 materials, while those with low acid/alkaline reserves are defined as Category 2 materials. If no colour change is observed in either tube, CONFIRM reagent is added to Tube B. After shaking, the resulting colour is matched to the colour chart on the CORROSITEX™ Testing Protocol Poster.
If the test item has strong colouring or shows other characteristics impairing a clear categorization according to the colour chart, the pH value can be measured in the tubes A and B and is used to confirm/determine the category of the test item

3. Classification
This step determines the appropriate Packing Group for the test sample. The CDS vials are warmed to room temperature (17 - 25˚C) before using. Vials 1 - 4 are utilized for sample replicate testing.The vial labeled (+) was utilized for a positive control sample, the vial labeled (-) for a negative control. The vial labeled C served as a CDS colour control. One BIOBARRIER disc was added on top of the first vial. 500 µL of the test item were applied by five steps per 100 µL with a positive displacement-pipette on the top of the BIOBARRIER disc and starting time was recorded with the first 100 µL. The total application has taken 30 seconds. This step was repeated for the remaining vials, staggering each start time by e.g. 10 seconds. The start time difference for each vial was subtracted from the final time to determine the net response time. As soon as a reaction had been observed, the time was recorded.
Control samples:
other: Negative control: 10% citric acid, positive control: 85% phosphoric acid
Amount/concentration applied:
0.5 mL
Duration of treatment / exposure:
min. 240 minutes
Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
n.a.
Number of replicates:
4

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
penetration time (in minutes)
Run / experiment:
mean of 4 replicates
Value:
24.83
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
positive indication of irritation

Any other information on results incl. tables

Qualification Test / Categorization Test

The test substance was compatible with the CORROSITEX™ Assay, as assessed in the qualification step. A direct colour change was observed in tube A and the category was read from the CORROSITEX™ colour chart. The chemical has been categorized to category 1.

Classification Test

   CORROSITEX™ time [min] Colour change   consistency change
 Replicate 1 19.50  yes   no
 Replicate 2  29.83   yes   no
 Replicate 3  23.67   yes   no
 Replicate 4  26.33   yes  no
 Mean +/- SD  24.83 +/- 4.36    
       
 Positive Control  11.67  yes no 
 Negative Control  63.00  yes  no

The mean time, required to activate the CDS was 24.83 +/- 4.36 min.

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 1B (corrosive)
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: OECD 435
Conclusions:
In this study under the given conditions the test substance showed corrosive effects. The test substance is classified as “CORROSIVE”, subcategory 1B according to the UN GHS, as the mean time to activate the CDS was > 3 – 60 min (category 1). The test substance is therefore assigned to Packing Group 2 and to EU Risk-Phrase (R 34).
Executive summary:

The potential of the test substance to induce skin corrosion was analysed by using the “In Vitro Membrane Barrier Test (CORROSITEX™ Assay)”, comprising a Chemical Detection System covered by a bio-barrier membrane.

The test substance Hordaphos CC MIS proved its ability to activate the CDS and was subsequently subjected to the timescale category test. The test substance was applied undiluted atop the bio-barrier membraneand the time required to activate the CDS was measured in four replicates. The mean time was compared to the given thresholds (see Table 1).

The test substance was compatible with the CORROSITEX™ Assay, as assessed in the qualification step. The categorization step and the classification step could be performed.

A direct colour change was observed in tube A and the category was read from the CORROSITEX™ colour chart. The chemical has been categorized to category 1.

In this study under the given conditions the test substance showed corrosive effects. The test substance is classified as “CORROSIVE”, subcategory 1B according to the UN GHS, as the mean time to activate the CDS was > 3 – 60 min, (24.83 ± 4.36 min.) (category 1). The test substance is therefore assigned to Packing Group 2 and to EU Risk-Phrase (R 34).

The controls confirmed the validity of the study. The test substance qualified for the CORROSITEX™ Assay, as assessed in the qualification test. The positive control activated the CDS between 3 - 60 min. (11.67 min.), the negative control did not activate the CDS before 60 min. (63.0 min.).

This study satisfies the requirement for Test Guideline OECD 435 for in vitro Membrane Barrier Test Method for Skin Corrosion.