Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-152-0 | CAS number: 116-71-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Not irritating to skin or eyes
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 1976
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: “Hazardous Substances Regulations" under the U.S. Federal Hazardous Substances Labelling Act Sect. 191.11 (February 1965)
- Version / remarks:
- 1965
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
Healthy New Zealand White rabbits (Porton- strain) aged 11-12 weeks with average body weights of 2.57 kg (males) and 2.19 Kgs. (femals), bred on the premises and maintained under a semi-barrier system. Six rabbits (3 males and 3 females) were acclimatized in the test area for one week prior to the start of the study.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
The rabbits were caged singly in. an experimental room maintained at a temperature of 20°C (± 1) and a relative humidity of 50-70%. Animals were exposed to artificial light for 10 hours daily from 08.00 18.00 hours. A commercial irradiated diet (Styles-Oxoid) was fed ad libitum. Sterile filtered water was available at all times. - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: shaved and slightly scarified
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.5 g
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hours
- Observation period:
- 14 days
- Number of animals:
- 3 males and 3 females
- Details on study design:
- The test was carried out according to the method given in the “Hazardous Substances Regulations" under the U.S. Federal Hazardous Substances Labelling Act Sect. 191.11 (February 1965).
Twenty-tour hours prior to the dermal application, the backs of the rabbits were shaved over an area consisting of at least 10% of the total body surface. Two test sites lateral to the mid line of the back were used an each rabbit. Immediately before the application of the test compound, the right hand site was abraded with the point of a sterile hypodermic needle. The abrasions were sufficiently deep to penetrate the stratum corneum but not to damage the dermis. The left hand site remained intact.
10 g of the test compound was mixed with 10 ml of water to make a suspension of 20 ml, 1.0 ml of which was applied each test site on a 2.5 cm square gauze pad. These were covered with aluminium foil secured with "Sleek" adhesive tape. The test sites were then covered by a 6" wide "Coban” self adhesive bandage in order to retain the test substance in dose contact with the skin.
After 24 hours the dressing was removed and the intact and abraded application sites were assessed for oedema and erythema. A further assessment was made at 72 hours and for any further period considered necessary up to 14 days.
The assessment of the macroscopic skin reaction was made according to the following grading system:
Score for skin irritation in rabbits (evaluation scheme)
Erythema and eschar formation
- No erythema: 0
- Very slight erythema (barely perceptible): 1
- Well defined erythema: 2
- Moderate to severe erythema: 3
- Severe erythema (beet redness) to slight eschar formation (injuries in depth): 4
Total possible erythema score: 4
Edema formation
- No edema: 0
- Very slight edema (barely perceptible): 1
- Slight edema (edges of area well defined by definite raising): 2
- Moderate edema (raised approximately 1 mm): 3
- Severe edema (raised more than 1 mm and extending beyond area of exposure): 4
Total possible edema score: 4
Primary Irritation Score
0 Non irritating
0.1 - 0.5 Minimally irritating
0.6 - 1.5 Slightly irritating
1.6 - 3.0 Mildly irritating
3.1 - 5.0 Moderately irritating
5.1 - 6.5 Severely irritating
6.6 - 8.0 Extremely irritating - Irritation parameter:
- primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
- Basis:
- other: The scores read after 24 and 72 hours for erythema and edema for the intact as well as for the abraded skin were summed up and divided by 4. (FHSLA § 191.11)
- Time point:
- other: 24/72 hours
- Score:
- 1.5
- Max. score:
- 8
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks on result:
- other: slightly irritating
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Remarks:
- shaved
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24 h
- Score:
- 0.83
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Remarks:
- shaved
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24 h
- Score:
- 1.17
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- A slight to well-defined erythema and a very slight to slight oedema were seen an all rabbits 24 hours after application of the compound. By 72 hours all intact sites were normal but 4/6 abraded sites were still showing a slight reaction. These were normal by day 10. The primary Irritation score was 1.5.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- A slight to well-defined erythema and a very slight to slight oedema were seen an all rabbits 24 hours after application of the compound. By 72 hours all intact sites were normal but 4/6 abraded sites were still showing a slight reaction. These were normal by day 10. The primary Irritation score was 1.5.
According to GHS, the test substance is not irritating to skin. - Executive summary:
The skin irritation in albino rabbits after single application was performed to determine the irritant potency of the test item on the albino rabbit skin.The test was carried out according to the method given in the “Hazardous Substances Regulations" under the U.S. Federal Hazardous Substances Labelling Act Sect. 191.11 (February 1965).
The test was performed on 3 male rabbits and 3 female rabbits (New Zealand White rabbits), checked for normal skin conditions. Before treatment, the flanks of the rabbits were shaved and immediately before treatment, the shaven skin on one side was slightly scarified. A gauze patch bearing 1 g of the test substance was applied to the prepared abraded and intact skin. The patches were covered by an impermeable material. Patches were held in place for 24 hours.
A slight to well-defined erythema and a very slight to slight oedema were seen an all rabbits 24 hours after application of the compound. By 72 hours all intact sites were normal but 4/6 abraded sites were still showing a slight reaction. These were normal by day 10. The primary Irritation score was 1.5.
According to the GHS evaluation system, the test substance is not irritating to skin.
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 1976
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- BASF method
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Himalayan
- Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Remarks:
- pasted
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.5 g
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 20 hours
- Observation period:
- 8 days
- Number of animals:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: back
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): -
- Time after start of exposure: 20 h
OBSERVATION TIME POINTS
24 hours, 8 days
SCORING SYSTEM:
- Parameters evaluated: reddening, edema, scabbing, necrosis, scarification
- Descriptors: questionable, minimal, moderate, marked, without effect - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 8 days
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Interpretation of results:
- other:
- Remarks:
- not irritating
- Conclusions:
- not irritating
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 1976
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: "Hazardous Substances Regulations" under the U.S.A. Federal Hazardous Substances Labelling Act Sect. 191.12 (February 1965), with slight modification.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Animals
Healthy New Zealand White rabbits (Porton- strain) aged 11-12 weeks with average body weights of 2.57 kg (males) and 2.19 Kgs. (femals), bred on the premises and maintained under a semi-barrier system. Six rabbits (3 males and 3 females) were acclimatized in the test area for one week prior to the start of the study.
Husbandry•
The rabbits were caged singly in. an experimental room maintained at a temperature of 20°C (± 1) and a relative humidity of 50-70%. Animals were exposed to artificial light for 10 hours daily from 08.00 18.00 hours. A commercial irradiated diet (Styles-Oxoid) was fed ad libitum. Sterile filtered water was available at all times. - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.1 g
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 30 second in 3 animals, 24 hours in 3 animals
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 72 hours
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 male and 3 female rabbit
- Details on study design:
- The test was carried out in accordance with the procedure set out in the "Hazardous Substances Regulations" under the U.S.A. Federal Hazardous Substances Labelling Act Sect. 191.12 (February 1965), with slight modification.
The eyes of the experimental animals were examined, and found normal prior to the test. 100 mg. of the test compound were instilled into the conjunctival sec of the left eye. The eyelids were then held closed for 1 second. The right eye served as a control. After 30 seconds the compound was, as far as possible, flushed out of the eyes of three of the rabbits with approximately 200 mL of warm water The rabbits were examined 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after application of the test compound and for any further period that was considered necessary. The ocular reactions were scored by the method described in "Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Food Drugs and Cosmetics" page 51, published by the Association of Food and Drug Officials of the U.S.A.. Corneal damage was assessed after staining with fluorescein. - Other effects / acceptance of results:
- 3 rinsed animals
3 non-rinsed animals - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 3 rinsed animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 3 non-rinsed animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 3 rinsed animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 3 non-rinsed animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 3 rinsed animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 3 non-rinsed animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 3 rinsed animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- 3 non-rinsed animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- A very slight to slight conjunctival reaction was seen in all treated eyes one hour after application of the compound. Redness was still present in 4/6 eyes at 24 hours. These had returned to normal by 48 hours (2 eyes) and 72 hours (2 eyes).
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The test item is not irritating to eyes.
Slight conjunctival effects were seen 1 hour after test item instillation. This effect was avoided by rinsing of the eyes. - Executive summary:
An eye irritation study after single application was performed to determine the irritant potency of the test item on the rabbit eyes in New Zealand White rabbits. The test was carried out in accordance with the procedure set out in the "Hazardous Substances Regulations" under the U.S.A. Federal Hazardous Substances Labelling Act Sect. 191.12 (February 1965), with slight modification.
The test material in an amount of 0.1 g was inserted into the conjunctival sac of the left eye of the 6 rabbits and the lids were held open for a few seconds. The right eye was not treated and served as a control. In three of the six rabbits approximately 30 seconds after treatment both eyes were rinsed with physiologic saline. The reactions were appraised with a slit lamp after 1 and 6 hours; 1; 2; and 3 days.
A very slight to slight conjunctival reaction was seen in all treated eyes one hour after application of the compound. Redness was still present in 4/6 eyes at 24 hours. These had returned to normal by 48 hours (2 eyes) and 72 hours (2 eyes).
In conclusion, the test item is not irritating to eyes.
Slight conjunctival effects were seen 1 hour after test item instillation. This effect was avoided by rinsing of the eyes.
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 1975
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Himalayan
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 50 mg
- Concentration (if solution): NA - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hours
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 8 days
- Details on study design:
- OBSERVATION TIME POINTS
1 hour, 24 hours, 8 days
SCORING SYSTEM:
- Parameters evaluated: reddening, edema, scabbing, necrosis, turbidity, scarification
- Descriptors: questionable, minimal, moderate, marked, without effect - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Remarks:
- test and control item
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 1 h/24 h/ 8 d
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- test and control item
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 1/24 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- test and control item
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 8 d
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Remarks:
- test and control item
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 1 hour
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Remarks:
- test and control item
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 14 h/8 d
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Interpretation of results:
- other:
- Remarks:
- not irritating
- Conclusions:
- Vat Blue 20 is not irritating to eyes
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Various studies for skin or eye irritating properties were conducted wit Vat Blue 20. In these studies, Vat Blue 20 was not irritating to skin and eyes.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.