Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study with acceptable restrictions (limited reporting)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1991
Report date:
1991

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
limited documentation
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Isononanoic acid, mixed esters with dipentaerythritol, heptanoic acid and pentaerythritol
EC Number:
282-775-7
EC Name:
Isononanoic acid, mixed esters with dipentaerythritol, heptanoic acid and pentaerythritol
Cas Number:
84418-63-3
Molecular formula:
substance is UVCB
IUPAC Name:
Isononanoic acid, mixed esters with dipentaerythritol, heptanoic acid and pentaerythritol
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): only trade name given
- Analytical purity: no data
- Lot/batch No.: Bx160491

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: commercial breeder (not further specified)
- Age at study initiation: approx. 10 -13 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 3185 - 3390 g

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: the untreated eye served as control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 0.1 mL
Duration of treatment / exposure:
single application without washing
Observation period (in vivo):
72 h
Reading time points: 2, 24, 48 and 72 h
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 females
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: no
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system, modified form of the system described by Kay and Calandra (1962) was used for interpretation

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 3 animals
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: revesibility not applicable
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 3 animals
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: reversibility not applicable
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0.7
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 h
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of animal #2 and 3
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
other: reversibility not applicable
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 3 animals
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: reversibility not applicable
Irritant / corrosive response data:
No corneal or iritial effects were observed. Conjunctival effects included slight redness and slight to moderate discharge. The effects had completely regressed by Day 3. Dried secretions on the upper and lower eyelids were present 1 day after dosing in 1 animal.
Other effects:
No or slight initial pain was observed.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified