Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 923-511-9 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation
- Remarks:
- other: Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Study
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 5 May to 28 July 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP Study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD-Guideline 437, Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method (BCOP), 7th of September 2009.
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: U.S. EPA (1996). Label Review Manual: 2nd Edition. EPA737-B-96-001. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: UN (2007). Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). New York & Geneva: United Nations Publications.
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Inorganic residual from kraft or soda pulping separated from green liquor in the chemical recovery cycle.
- EC Number:
- 923-511-9
- IUPAC Name:
- Inorganic residual from kraft or soda pulping separated from green liquor in the chemical recovery cycle.
- Details on test material:
- Name: "Green liquor sludge".Molecular formula: UVCB.Batch No.: Not stated.EC No.: 923-511-9.Appearance: Solid, light grey when dried.Solubility: In water: washed substance is not solubleIn other solvents: not available.pH: Not available.Conditions of storage: Room temperature. Storage in the dark but may be used under light.Stability at conditions of storage: Not available. The test material was not dried.Expiry date: Not available.
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- other: Isolated corneas from the eyes of cows and bulls
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Corneas: Isolated corneas from the eyes of cows and bulls aged between 18 – 20 month and free of macroscopically visible defects.Supplier: Slaughterhouse Klaus Grandits, Ungerbachstraße 10, A-2860 Kirchschlag.Justification: According to the guidelines.Number of corneas: Total of 9 corneas: 3 for the test substance, 3 for the negative control and 3 for the positive control.
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 750 µL per cornea
- Details on study design:
- Preparation of the positive controlA solution of 20 % imidazole in deionised water (sterile) was prepared freshly before use. No analyses of the preparation were performed.Preparation of the test substanceThe test substance was administered at a concentration of 20 %. Justification of the solvent is according to the guidelines. No analyses of the test substance and its preparation were performed.Test designBovine corneas were isolated and mounted in cornea holders and equilibrated for one hour to achieve normal metabolic activity. After exclusion of corneas which did not achieve quality criteria, the corneas were distributed into groups (3 per group) and exposed to the test substance, the negative control and the positive control for 4 hours. Then the substances were removed and the corneas were accurately washed and the opacity and permeability of each cornea were recorded. Opacity was measured quantitatively with the aid of an opacitometer. Permeability was determined by the amount of sodium fluorescein dye that penetrated all cornea layers. For this purpose fluorescein solution was filled into the anterior chambers of the cornea holders followed by an incubation period of 90 minutes. The amount of sodium fluorescein that crossed into the posterior chambers was quantitatively measured with a spectrophotometer at OD490. Using opacity and permeability data an in IVIS was calculated. The positive and negative control groups were simultaneously used for other, concurrently performed studies.Application of test and control substances750 µl test substance preparation were introduced into the anterior chamber through the dosing holes on the top surface of the chamber, and the holes were subsequently sealed during exposure (close-chamber method). Then the corneas were exposed in a horizontal position for 4 hours while ensuring that the test substance adequately covered the epithelial surface. Incubation temperature, monitored with a min / max thermometer, was 30.9 °C – 33.5 °C.Post-Exposure IncubationAfter the exposure period substances were removed from the anterior chamber and the epithelium was washed three to six times with EMEM+ to determine the effectiveness of rinsing acidic or alkaline materials and to remove substance residues. cEMEM was used as a final rinse to ensure removal of the phenol red from the anterior chamber prior to the opacity measurement. Both chambers were then refilled with fresh cEMEM.Opacity MeasurementOpacity was determined by the amount of light transmission through the cornea. Corneal opacity was measured quantitatively in Lux with the aid of an opacitometer-kit BASF-OP2.0, which was calibrated with a standard filter set before the corneas were measured. Application of Fluorescein 1 ml sodium fluorescein solution was added to the anterior chamber of the cornea holder and then incubated in a horizontal position for 90 minutes. Incubation temperature, monitored with a min / max thermometer, was 30.9 °C – 33.5 °C.Permeability MeasurementPermeability was determined by the amount of sodium fluorescein dye that penetrated all corneal cell layers. The amount of sodium fluorescein that crossed into the posterior chamber was quantitatively measured with the aid of a Bio-Tek EL800 microtiter plate reader at 490 nm. For measurement 360 µl of cEMEM from the posterior chamber were transferred into the wells of a 96-well microtiter plate (triplicates). Data were recorded as OD490 values which were equivalent to the OD490 values based upon a visible light spectrophotometer using a standard 1 cm path length. To proof that the measurement was performed in the linear range wells containing five concentrations (ranging from 12.5 µg/ml to 0.78 µg/ml) of fluorescein solutions were additionally prepared.OpacityOpacity values were calculated as follows:Opacity value = ax (I0/I) + bI = illuminance (Lux) with the corneaI0 = illuminance (Lux) without cornea a, b = equipment-specific variables The standard deviation for each group was calculated as well.PermeabilityTo ensure that the permeability values measured were in the exponential range the linearity was determined by triple measurement of fluorescein solutions of five concentrations. A linear calibration function and the correlation coefficient thereof was calculated. As the OD490 values of corneas treated with 20 % imidazole lied outside of the linear range dilutions of 1:5 were measured.As the OD490 values of corneas treated with the test substance lied outside of the linear range dilutions of 1:5 were measured.The standard deviation for each group was calculated as well.IVIS (In Vitro Irritancy Score)The mean opacity and mean permeability values were corrected for background opacity and the negative control permeability values. The mean opacity and permeability values for each treatment group were combined in an empirically-derived formula to calculate the IVIS for each treatment group as follows:IVIS = mean opacity value + (15 x mean permeability OD490 value)The standard deviation for each group was calculated as well.Assay acceptance criteriaThis test is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:1. The negative control response results in opacity and permeability values that are less than the upper limits for background opacity and permeability values of the historical data of the negative controls.2. The IVIS of the positive control is within two standard deviations of the historical positive control mean.The historical values of the negative and positive control includes all generated data of this year.Interpretation of resultsAccording to the guidelines, an irritation potential of a test substances is predicted if the mean IVIS of three individual corneas exposed to the test substance is ≥ 55.1.
Results and discussion
In vitro
Results
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Run / experiment:
- GLS test substance
- Value:
- 78.6
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
In vivo
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The Opacity value of "Green liquor sludge" was 14.4, 15 x Permeability value was 64.23 which resulted in an IVIS of 78.6.The IVIS of "Green liquor sludge" was 78.6. A slight increase in opacity and an important increase in permeability was observed.
- Other effects:
- None
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table1: Opacity, permeability and IVIS values
Opacity, permeability (1 x value measured and 15 x values for IVIS calculation) and Ivalues of test substance, negative and positive controls. Individual data, means and standard deviations (SD).
Substance | Opacity | Permeability (1x) | Permeability (15x) | IVIS | |||||||
Individual | Mean | SD | Individual | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Individual | Mean | SD | |
Aqua dest. | 6.6 | 4.9 | 1.5 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.03 | 6.6 | 4.9 | 1.5 |
3.6 | -0.001 | 3.6 | |||||||||
4.5 | -0.001 | 4.5 | |||||||||
20 % Imidazole | 76.4 | 75.4 | 0.9 | 3.385 | 3.220 | 0.433 | 48.3 | 6.495 | 127.2 | 123.7 | 7.0 |
75.0 | 3.547 | 128.2 | |||||||||
74.7 | 2.729 | 115.7 | |||||||||
Test substance | 11.3 | 14.4 | 7.2 | 5.582 | 4.282 | 1.135 | 64.23 | 17.025 | 95.0 | 78.6 | 14.9 |
22.6 | 3.490 | 75.0 | |||||||||
9.2 | 3.772 | 65.8 |
Unforeseen events
The temperature of the incubator was 30.9 °C – 33.5 °C instead of 31 °C – 33 °C. This deviation is considered to be of no relevance for the outcome of this study.
The positive control IVIS was 123.7. This value is slightly higher than 120.3, which is the upper limit of the mean +/- 2SD of the historical data of the positive control. This deviation is considered to be of no relevance for the outcome of this study.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- corrosive
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Green liquor sludge is regarded to be an ocular corrosive or severe irritant, according to the OECD Guideline 437 for the testing of chemicals “Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants”.According to the results of this study and the Directive 2001/59/EC for classification, the test substance "Green liquor sludge" needs to be labelled as R41 (EU), Category 1 (EPA and GHS).
- Executive summary:
The Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Study (BCOP Test Method) was performed to reveal possible ocular corrosivity and severe irritation of"Green liquor sludge", according tothe OECD Guideline 437 for the testing of chemicals “Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants”,.
Fresh isolated and quality checked corneas were mounted in cornea holders and the initial opacity was determined. After equilibration 750 µl of the test substance preparation were topically administered to 3 isolated bovine corneas to the epithelial surfaces for 4 hours andthe final opacity was measured. Then 1 ml of a fluorescein solution was added on the epithelial site and permeability was measured after 90 minutes.
Two groups of 3 corneas each served as positive and negative controls. Both control substances were administered under identical conditions as the test substance. The following solutions served as control substances:
- Negative control: sterile aqua dest.
- Positive control: 20 % imidazole.
Finally the IVIS (In Vitro Irritancy Score) was calculated as follows:
IVIS = mean opacity value + (15 x mean permeability).
The opacity and mean permeability values were corrected for background opacity and the negative control permeability values. The mean opacity value results from subtraction of final opacity from initial opacity. A substance that induces an IVIS≥55.1 is defined as ocular corrosive or severe irritant.
The IVIS for "Green liquor sludge" was 78.6.
IVIS of the negative control was 4.9 and for the positive control 123.7, thus demonstrating the validity of the experiment.
According to the results of this study and the OECD Guideline 437, the test substance Green liquor sludge is considered to be an ocular corrosive or severe irritant.
According to the guidelines "Green liquor sludge" needs to be labelled as R41 (EU), Category 1 (EPA and GHS).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.