Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 606-728-0 | CAS number: 212322-56-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 06 Dec 2001 to 07 January 2002
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 002
- Report date:
- 2002
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- ethyl 3-{1-[3-amino-4-(methylamino)phenyl]-N-(pyridin-2-yl)formamido}propanoate
- EC Number:
- 606-728-0
- Cas Number:
- 212322-56-0
- Molecular formula:
- C18 H22 N4 O3
- IUPAC Name:
- ethyl 3-{1-[3-amino-4-(methylamino)phenyl]-N-(pyridin-2-yl)formamido}propanoate
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: CrlGlxBrlHan : WI (SPF quality)
- Details on species / strain selection:
- Rats were used since these are suitable animal species for this kind of study and historical control data are available. A non-GLP range finding study with the test article BIBR 1048 Diamin-CDBA 122 BS showed no distinct sex-specific differences in toxicity. Therefore, only male animals were used.
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- The animals were housed in groups of 5 animals in Noryl cages, type IV, under standardized air conditioned environment.
Temperature at 17-23 degrees Celsius
Light/darkness cycle: 12/12 hours
Illumination period: 6:00am -6:00pm
Average Illumination: Ca 60lx (dependent on the cage position). During the experimental and observational periods, the light intensity was increased up to 100 lx.
Air circulation: Ca 12 air changes per hour
Temperature and humidity were recorder continuously. The cages were changed weekly. Sterilized wood granules served as bedding. Food Nafag 9433 (Eberle Nafag AG), Gossau/Switzerland) and municipal tap water were provided ad libitum.
The food and water were considered to be free of any contaminants that could have influenced the outcome of the study. The analytical data were filed by the Section Biological Laboratory Service and the Municipal Water Supply Agency, respectively.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- 0.5% Cremophor
- Details on exposure:
- A previous acute oral toxicity study with BIBR 1048 Diamin-CDBA 122 BS caused no marked toxicity up to 5000 mg/kg (Weiglib, 1998). Due to lack of any exposure data such as plasma concentrations, it is unclear to which extent the test article was absorbed. According to existing guidelines a maximum tolerated dose, a dose producing some indications of cytoxicity or the maximum feasible dose should be used for this kind of assay. Using ip injection of 0.5% cremophor suspensions no clinical signs of toxicity were observed at 100 mg/kg (once) and 500 mg/kg BIBR 1048 Diamin-CDBA 122 BS (twice within 24 hrs) in an explorative range-finding study (non-GLP). Higher concentrations could not suspended homogenously. Therefore, the higher dose level of 500 mg/kg and two lower doses of 150 and 50 mg/kg were investigated. A vehicle control (0.5% cremophor) and a positive control group (cyclophosphamide 20 mg/kg) were included. The injected dose volume was 10ml/kg. Animals of all groups were treated twice at an interval of 24 hours.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hrs, 48 hrs
- Frequency of treatment:
- twice per interval
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 150 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 male rats/group
- Control animals:
- yes
- Positive control(s):
- cyclophosphamide, 20 mg/kg
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Polychromatic erythrocytes
Red Nor-mochromatic erythrocytes - Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- Animals were anaesthesized and killed by cervical dislocation 24 hrs post second treatment. The bone marrow of one femur was flushed and suspended in fetal calf serum (FCS). Anucleated Erythrocytic cells were separated from other myeloic cells using cellulose column fractionation. This purification step enables the preparation of slides containing only polychromatic (PE) and normochromatic erythrocytes (NE) without any nucleatic cells or mast cell granules which can occur particularly in rats (Romagna and Staniforth, 1989). Smears were prepared from the sediment after centrifugation of the eluate on cleang and grease-free slides. One slide per animal was stained with May-Grunwald/Giemsa. The slides were mounted with Entellen (Merck, Darmstadt), coded and scored.
- Evaluation criteria:
- The micronucleus test is considered valid if the positive control chemical induces a statistically significant increase in the frequency of micronucleated PE and a sufficient high number of animals is available for analysis.
The criterion for a positive result is a statistically significant, dose-dependent increase in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in treated animals as compared with controls. Additionally, historical control frequencies obtained in similar experiments using this rat strain are taken into consideration. - Statistics:
- The statistical analysis of the data was performed using the Fisher-Pitman permutation test (Leimer et al., 1991). This method takes into account the characteristics of the micronucleus assay (the animals is the experimental unit, small absolute incidences with non-normal distributions). All comparisons were made against the vehicle control. A probability of P =<5% was considered statistically significant. All calculations were done in the Biometrics Group, Department of Medical Services.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
This experiment with male rats demonstrated thar BIBR 1048 Diamin-CDBA 122 BS did not damage the chromosome complement (structural and numerical) in vivo when given up to maximal feasible dose levels following intraperitoneal injection.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.