Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 416-740-6 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Acceptable well-documented study report which meets basic scientific principles.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Genetic Toxicology Testing of Di(2-ethylhexyl) Terephthalate
- Author:
- Barber, ED
- Year:
- 1 994
- Bibliographic source:
- Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 23:228-233
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- di-2-ethylhexyl terephthalate (DEHT)
- IUPAC Name:
- di-2-ethylhexyl terephthalate (DEHT)
- Reference substance name:
- Bis(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate
- EC Number:
- 229-176-9
- EC Name:
- Bis(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate
- Cas Number:
- 6422-86-2
- Molecular formula:
- C24H38O4
- IUPAC Name:
- bis(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate
- Details on test material:
- Di-2-ethylhexyl terephthalate (DEHT) (Eastman 168 plasticizer; CAS 6422-86-2) is a clear, viscous liquid used as a general purpose plasticizer for flexible polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and polyvinyl chloride/vinyl acetate (PVC/VA) copolymers.
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Method
- Target gene:
- HGPRT
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- A culture of CHO-K1 , subclone BH4, was obtained from the laboratory of Dr. A.W. Hise (Oak Ridge National Labortory, Oak Ridge, TN). Stock cultures were stored in liquid nitrogen and expanded periodically in HAT medium to select for the HGPRT+ phenotype.
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Dose levels of 1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20 nl/ml were chosen based on cytotoxicity assays. The highest dose level, 20nl/ml, is approximately two times higher than the solubility limit of DEHT in Ham's F12 culture medium containing 1% DMSO.
- Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- medium only
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 0.25mg/ml dimethylnitrosamine
- Positive control substance:
- N-dimethylnitrosamine
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Doses were chosen following a cytotoxicty in Ham’s F12 culture medium. Using toxicity relationship as a guide, five concentrations were selected covering the range from 0 to 90% reduction of colony forming ability.
CHO-K1-BH1 cells were seeded into flasks. After 24h incubation, media containing the appropriate concentrations of the test article and the positive and negative (solvent) controls were applied to the flasks and incubated for 4 hours. Following overnight incubation in F12 culture medium, the monolayers were trypsinized, and the cells were reseeded at densities of ~100 cells per flask. These flasks were incubated for 10 days to determine cell survival from the treatments. Cells for mutant scoring were seeded in flasks and subcultured for a period of 9 days to allow for expression of induced mutations. At the end of the expression period, cultures were reseeded in F12 medium containing 6-thioguanine as the selective agent. After 7 days incubation, colonies were stained and counted. The mutant frequency at each treatment condition was calculated by dividing the total number of mutant colonies by the product.
During the assay samples of Hams F12 growth medium containing DEHT were submitted for analysis to confirm dose levels. Analysis of these samples showed good agreement with expected values for the nonactivation portion of the study by values much less than expected for the S-9 containing samples. A stability study showed that 95% of the DEHT could be recovered by extraction 0.5hr after sample preparation but that only 47% could be recovered at 5.0 hr when S-9 was present. Such decomposition of DEHT was not noted when the S-9 activation fraction was omitted. It seems probably that the esterases found in the rat liver S-9 were hydrolyzing the DEHT. - Evaluation criteria:
- At the end of the expression period, cultures were reseeded in F12 medium containing 6-thioguanine as the selective agent. After 7 days incubation, colonies were stained and counted. The mutant frequency at each treatment condition was calculated by dividing the total number of mutant colonies by the product.
- Statistics:
- Mutant frequency data were evaluated using the statistical tables provided by Kastenbaum and Bowman.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at high doses during hte treatment phase of the assay
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: 15 doses of DEHT from 0.001 to 20.0 nl/ml were tested in the clonal cytotoxicity assay. Cell survivals from 88.6%-106% were observed at these dose levels, indicating that there was little or no reduction in cloning efficiency. The highest dose level, 20nl/ml is approximately two times higher than the solubility limit of DEHT in Ham’s F12 culture medium containing 1% DMSO (solvent for DEHT). On the basis of these clonal cytotoxicity data, dose levels were chosen.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: During the treatment phase of the mutagenicity assay, survival-to-treatment data were obtained at the dose levels of DEHT chosen for the assay. At dose levels of 20 and 10nl/ml DEHT in the non-activation assay, the relative cell survival values were reduced to 69.2% and 72.9% respectively, indicating a weak toxic response had occurred. The positive control, ethyl methanesulfonate at 0.25mg/ml, reduced the relative cell survival to 40.4% in this portion of the assay. The activation portion of the assay, the positive control chemical, dimethylnitrosamine at 0.25mg/ml, reduced the relative cell survival to 34.8%. All other treatments in both the non-activation and the activation portions of the assay resulted in relative survivals not different from the untreated controls. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
The relative cloning efficiencies for all the treatments were near 100%, indicating good cell survival in the assay. The mutant frequency data for the DEHT-treated cultures and for the negative and solvent control cultures for the nonactivation assay lie between 0.5 and 2.9 mutants per million surviving cells. The mutant frequency for the ethyl methanesulfonate treated cells is 298.8 per million surviving cells, a very large and significant increase above the negative controls. The data form the DEHT-treated cultures do not show any statistically significant increases when compared with the negative controls. The mutant frequency values for the S-9 activation portion of the study are somewhat larger than those in the table; however the negative control values are within the limits described for this assay and are consistent with the historical values for this laboratory. There are no statistically significant increases among the DEHT-treated cell populations. The positive control data show a significant increase in mutant frequency when compared to the medium or solvent controls.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative with and without metabolic activation
The test material, does not produce signification increased in mutant frequency in the CHO cells and is therefore negative in this mammalian cell mutagenicity test. This finding does not warrant the classification of the submission substance as a germ cell mutagen under the new Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 on classification, labeling, and packaging of substances and mixtures (CLP) or under the Directive 67/518/EEC for dangerous substances and Directive 1999/45/EC for preparations. - Executive summary:
DEHT was tested in the Chinese hamster ovary/hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (CHO/HGPRT) in vitro mammalian cell mutagenicity assay. This assay system detects forward mutations f the X-linked HGPRT locus using the toxic purine analog 6-thioguanine as the selective agent. The lack of a positive response in the cultures treated with DEHT at dose levels up to and slightly higher than the solubility limit of DEHT in the assay medium demonstrates that DEHT was not mutagenic in this test system.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.