Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 240-400-4 | CAS number: 16324-27-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Rat oral LD50 > 10000 mg/kg bw
Rat inhalation LC50 > 1895 mg/m3
Rat dermal LD50 > 2000 mg/kg bw
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Started on April 2, 1979.
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Old study, but well documented and scientifically acceptable.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The acute oral LD50 of the test item in rats of both sexes was assessed administering three doses at 5000, 6500, 8000 and 10000 mg/kg bw. Animals were observed over a period of 14 days.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- Pre GLP
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Tif RAIf (SPF) strain
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: animals were raised on the premises were used for these experiments.
- Age at study initiation: 7 to 8 weeks old.
- Weight at study initiation: males in the range of 168-199 g; females in the range of 159-177 g.
- Housing: during the treatment and observation period the animals were housed in groups of 5 in Macrolon cages (type 3).
- Diet: ad libitum rat food - NAFAG, Gossau SG.
- Water: ad libitum.
- Acclimation period: for a minimum of 4 days.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 22 ± 2 °C
- Humidity: 55 ± 10 %
- Photoperiod: 10 hours light cycle day. - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose)
- Remarks:
- 2 %
- Details on oral exposure:
- - Volume: 20 ml/kg
- Doses:
- 5000, 6500, 8000 and 10000 mg/kg bw
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 x sex x group.
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes; animals were at random to a necropsy at the end of the observation period.
- Examinations performed: bodyweights were recorded immediately prior to dosing (control weights) and at 7 and 14 days. - Statistics:
- LD50 including 95 % confidence limits were calculated by the logit model.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 10 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Mortality:
- No dead occurred at all the doses tested.
- Clinical signs:
- other: The rats in all dosage groups showed sedation, dyspnoea, exophthalmus, curved position and ruffled fur. The animals recovered within 6 to 7 days.
- Gross pathology:
- No substance related gross organ changes were seen.
- Interpretation of results:
- not classified
- Remarks:
- Migrated information According to the CLP Regulation. Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- LD50 > 10000 mg/kg bw
- Executive summary:
Method
The acute oral LD50 of the test item in rats of both sexes was assessed administering three doses at 5000, 6500, 8000 and 10000 mg/kg bw. Animals were observed over a period of 14 days.
Results
No dead occurred at all the doses tested. The rats in all dosage groups showed sedation, dyspnoea, exophthalmus, curved position, diarrhoea and ruffled fur; the animals recovered within 7 to 10 days.
LD50 > 10000 mg/kg bw
Reference
Rate of deaths
Dose mg/kg | Sex | No. of animals | No. of animals dead | Death rate % |
5000 | M | 5 | 0 | 0 |
6500 | M | 5 | 0 | 0 |
8000 | M | 5 | 0 | 0 |
10000 | M | 5 | 0 | 0 |
5000 | F | 5 | 0 | 0 |
6500 | F | 5 | 0 | 0 |
8000 | F | 5 | 0 | 0 |
10000 | F | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Signs and symptoms
5000 mg/kg bw
Signs and symptoms | Hours | Days | ||||||||||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 24 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | |
Sedation | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||||||
Dyspnoea | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||
Dacryorrhoea | ||||||||||||||||||
Chromodacryorrhoea | ||||||||||||||||||
Rinorrhoea | ||||||||||||||||||
Epistaxis | ||||||||||||||||||
Exophthalmos | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | + | ||||||||||||
Salivation | ||||||||||||||||||
Ruffled fur | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||||||||
Pallor | ||||||||||||||||||
Cyanosis | ||||||||||||||||||
Diarrhoea | ||||||||||||||||||
Body position (ventral) | ||||||||||||||||||
Body position (lateral) | ||||||||||||||||||
Body position (curved) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||
Ataxia | ||||||||||||||||||
Trismus | ||||||||||||||||||
Tremor | ||||||||||||||||||
Tonic clonic muscle spasms | ||||||||||||||||||
Convulsions |
+ = slight, ++ = moderate, +++ = severe
6500 mg/kg bw
Signs and symptoms | Hours | Days | ||||||||||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 24 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | |
Sedation | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||||||
Dyspnoea | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||||
Dacryorrhoea | ||||||||||||||||||
Chromodacryorrhoea | ||||||||||||||||||
Rinorrhoea | ||||||||||||||||||
Epistaxis | ||||||||||||||||||
Exophthalmos | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | + | ||||||||||
Salivation | ||||||||||||||||||
Ruffled fur | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||||
Pallor | ||||||||||||||||||
Cyanosis | ||||||||||||||||||
Diarrhoea | ||||||||||||||||||
Body position (ventral) | ||||||||||||||||||
Body position (lateral) | ||||||||||||||||||
Body position (curved) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||
Ataxia | ||||||||||||||||||
Trismus | ||||||||||||||||||
Tremor | ||||||||||||||||||
Tonic clonic muscle spasms | ||||||||||||||||||
Convulsions |
+ = slight, ++ = moderate, +++ = severe
8000 mg/kg bw
Signs and symptoms | Hours | Days | ||||||||||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 24 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | |
Sedation | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||||||
Dyspnoea | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||||
Dacryorrhoea | ||||||||||||||||||
Chromodacryorrhoea | ||||||||||||||||||
Rinorrhoea | ||||||||||||||||||
Epistaxis | ||||||||||||||||||
Exophthalmos | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | |||||||||||
Salivation | ||||||||||||||||||
Ruffled fur | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||||||
Pallor | ||||||||||||||||||
Cyanosis | ||||||||||||||||||
Diarrhoea | ||||||||||||||||||
Body position (ventral) | ||||||||||||||||||
Body position (lateral) | ||||||||||||||||||
Body position (curved) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||
Ataxia | ||||||||||||||||||
Trismus | ||||||||||||||||||
Tremor | ||||||||||||||||||
Tonic clonic muscle spasms | ||||||||||||||||||
Convulsions |
+ = slight, ++ = moderate, +++ = severe
10000 mg/kg bw
Signs and symptoms | Hours | Days | ||||||||||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 24 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | |
Sedation | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |||||||||||
Dyspnoea | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||||
Dacryorrhoea | ||||||||||||||||||
Chromodacryorrhoea | ||||||||||||||||||
Rinorrhoea | ||||||||||||||||||
Epistaxis | ||||||||||||||||||
Exophthalmos | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | + | + | |||||||||||
Salivation | ||||||||||||||||||
Ruffled fur | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||||||
Pallor | ||||||||||||||||||
Cyanosis | ||||||||||||||||||
Diarrhoea | ||||||||||||||||||
Body position (ventral) | ||||||||||||||||||
Body position (lateral) | ||||||||||||||||||
Body position (curved) | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ||||||||||
Ataxia | ||||||||||||||||||
Trismus | ||||||||||||||||||
Tremor | ||||||||||||||||||
Tonic clonic muscle spasms | ||||||||||||||||||
Convulsions |
+ = slight, ++ = moderate, +++ = severe
Bodyweight changes
Dose | 5000 | 6500 | 8000 | 10000 | |
Day 1 M | Mean BW/SD (g) | 168/4.8 | 184/12.9 | 199/12.1 | 190/7.4 |
Day 1 F | 177/3.7 | 159/7.1 | 177/3.4 | 172/5.9 | |
Day 7 M | 268/5.9 | 240/10.7 | 244/22.4 | 247/11.4 | |
Day 7 F | 209/9.5 | 185/5.5 | 203/6.0 | 198/7.9 | |
Day 14 M | 272/15.3 | 282/17.4 | 292/11.5 | 280/17.4 | |
Day 14 F | 266/9.2 | 198/6.4 | 221/10.4 | 210/11.3 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 10 000 mg/kg bw
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: inhalation
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Particle size not specified. The analogous substance, part of the Stilbene Fluorescent Withening Agents, group 3, is the acid form of the disulphonated derivative dihydroxyethyl derivative. Justification for Read Across is reported in the endpoint summary and in the Category Justification Report attached to the Section 13 of this dossier.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 403 (Acute Inhalation Toxicity)
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Winkelmann, Borchen, Germany.
- Weight at study initiation: 180 - 200 g. - Route of administration:
- inhalation: dust
- Type of inhalation exposure:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- air
- Analytical verification of test atmosphere concentrations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- gravimetric with membrane filter.
- Duration of exposure:
- 1 - 4 h
- Concentrations:
- 163.3, 375, 1225 and 1895 mg/m³ air at 4 hour exposure.
1820 mg/m³ air at 1 hour exposure. - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10
- Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days .
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes.
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs. - Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect level:
- > 1 895 mg/m³ air (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Exp. duration:
- 4 h
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect level:
- 1 820 mg/m³ air (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Exp. duration:
- 1 h
- Mortality:
- No mortality occuerred.
- Clinical signs:
- other: other:
- Gross pathology:
- No abnormalities detected.
- Interpretation of results:
- other: not applicable.
- Remarks:
- Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- LC50 (4 h): > 1.895 mg/l air
- Executive summary:
Method
Acute inhalation toxicity was assessed following the method described into the OECD guideline 403.
Results
LC50 (4 h): > 1.895 mg/l air
LC50 (1 h): 1.820 mg/l air
Conclusion
According to CLP Regulation (EC 1272/2008), 3.1 Acute toxicity section, substances can be allocated to one of four toxicity categories based on acute toxicity by the oral, dermal or inhalation route according to the numeric criteria. Acute toxicity values are expressed as (approximate) LD50 (oral, dermal) or LC50 (inhalation) values or as acute toxicity estimates (ATE).
The inhalation LD50 value classification limit for dust is 5.0 mg/l (category 4: 1.0 < ATE ≤ 5.0 mg/l). In the current test an LD50 was non identified; considering the fact that no mortality occurred, a classification category can not be assigned. Thus, a classification according to the CLP Regulation (EC 1272/2008) is not applicable.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Value:
- 1 895 mg/m³ air
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Only a summary is available but with enough details available to describe the endpoint.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The acute dermal LD50 of the test item was tested in rabbits administered by dermal occlusive dressing (Draize method) at a single concentration of 2000 mg/kg bw.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- Pre GLP
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Species:
- rabbit
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: mean 2205 g.
- Housing: one animal per cage.
- Food: Nafag Würfel Nr. 84.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 23°C ± 2°C
- Humidity: 55 ± 5%
- Photoperiod: 14 hrs light/day. - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: fresh suspension with gum arabic 1% / tap water
- Details on dermal exposure:
- APPLICATION
One application to intact skin. Occlusive dressing (Draize method) for 24 hours.
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: dehairing of the dorsal skin by shearing.
- % coverage: SURFACE OF 200-300 cm2
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: washing the application area with lukewarm water and a sponge.
TEST MATERIAL
- Concentration: 80% - Duration of exposure:
- 24 hours
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 3 males and 3 females.
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 8 days.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Mortality:
- No deaths occurred.
- Clinical signs:
- other: No systemic symptoms were recorded.
- Interpretation of results:
- not classified
- Remarks:
- Migrated information According to the CLP regulation. Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- LD50 > 2000 mg/kg bw
- Executive summary:
Method
The acute dermal LD50 of the test item was tested in rabbits administered by dermal occlusive dressing (Draize method) at a single concentration of 2000 mg/kg bw.
Results
No deaths occurred.
LD50 > 2000 mg/kg bw
Reference
Skin reactions recorded
Dose mg/kg | Time point | N. of animals with reactions | Reaction |
2000 | 24 hrs | 6/6 | Erythema |
2 days | 1/6 | Erythema, oedema | |
3 days | 1/6 1/6 |
Erythema Oedema |
|
4 days | 1/6 1/6 |
Erythema Scaling, oedema |
|
5 + 6 days | 1/6 | Scaling, oedema | |
7 + 8 days | 2/6 1/6 |
Scaling Scaling, oedema |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
Additional information
Many summaries of tests performed according to the official guidelines are available; they are all consistent and indicate that no acute toxicity is expressed by the substance up to very high doses (> 10000 mg/Kg bw).
The Klimish 2 study for acute dermal toxicity here reported, was performed at 2000 mg/Kg bw with no effect (Ciba-Geigy Ltd., 1970).
Because of the physical state and the trade forms, inhalation is not an appropriate route of exposure. Acute toxicity results for the other two exposure routes indicate no concern therefore no testing was performed. One test is available on an analogous substance, performed at the maximum allowed concentration of 1890 mg/m3: no effects were observed.
The analogous substance, part of the Stilbene Fluorescent Withening Agents, group 3, is the acid form of the disulphonated derivative dihydroxyethyl derivative; due to the sulphonation/salification degree is less soluble. This property makes the Read Across substance OB 3a-A(free acid) a conservative representative because of the potential higher bioavailability.
As a conclusion it can be stated that the substance is not acutely toxic for all the three exposure patterns.
Justification for classification or non-classification
According to CLP Regulation (EC 1272/2008), 3.1 Acute toxicity section, substances can be allocated to one of four toxicity categories based on acute toxicity by the oral, dermal or inhalation route according to the numeric criteria. Acute toxicity values are expressed as (approximate) LD50 (oral, dermal) or LC50 (inhalation) values or as acute toxicity estimates (ATE).
The oral LD50 value was established to be greater than 10000 mg/kg body weight, therefore the test substance is out of any classification limit for acute oral toxicity (oral acute toxicity category 4: 300 < ATE ≤ 2000 mg/kg bw).
The dermal LD50 value was established to exceed 2000 mg/kg body weight, which exceeded the highest CLP classification limit (dermal acute toxicity category 4: 1000 < ATE ≤ 2000 mg/kg bw).
The inhalation LC50 value was established to be greater than 1895 mg/m3. For powder the limit for classification is ATE > 5 mg/l i. e. 5000 mg/m3.
Since no effect was observed at the tested concentration and this was the maximum reachable concentration in the test condition, it is assumed that the substance is not classified for inhalation acute toxicity.
In conclusion, the available experimental data are adequate for classification and labelling and the test substance is non classified for oral and dermal acute toxicity, according to the CLP Regulation (EC 1272/2008).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.