Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
16 Apr - 18 May 2012
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP-guideline study.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2012
Report date:
2012

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmitelsicherheit, Landesinstitut für Arbeitsschutz und Produktsicherheit, München, Germany
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
There were hints that the substance is not a strong sensitiser, and the GPMT is the better method to detect weak sensitisers

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Fatty acids, C14-18 and C16-18-unsatd., mixed esters with castor oil, castor oil fatty acids, 2-ethylhexanoic acid and 2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)-1-butanol
EC Number:
295-653-3
EC Name:
Fatty acids, C14-18 and C16-18-unsatd., mixed esters with castor oil, castor oil fatty acids, 2-ethylhexanoic acid and 2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)-1-butanol
Cas Number:
92113-48-9
Molecular formula:
Not applicable, substance is a UVCB.
IUPAC Name:
Fatty acids, C14-18 and C16-18-unsatd., mixed esters with castor oil, castor oil fatty acids, 2-ethylhexanoic acid and 2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)-1-butanol
Details on test material:
Chemical name: Fatty acids, C14-C18 and C16-C18-unsatd., mixed esters with castor oil, castor oil fatty acids, 2-ethylhexanoic acid and 2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)-1-butanol
- Analytical purity: no data
- Lot/batch No.: 06-9209
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 2015-12-31
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature, protected from light

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
other: Crl:HA
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 4 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 369-467 g
- Housing: The animals were kept in groups.
- Diet: Altromin 3122 maintenance diet for guinea pigs (preliminary test: lot no. 061211; main study: lot no. 261111), ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3
- Humidity (%): 55± 10
- Air changes (per hr): at least 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal and epicutaneous
Vehicle:
cotton seed oil
Concentration / amount:
Induction: 5% (intradermal), 100% (topical)
Challenge: 100%
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
cotton seed oil
Concentration / amount:
Induction: 5% (intradermal), 100% (topical)
Challenge: 100%
No. of animals per dose:
Negative control group: 5 animals
Test group: 10 animals
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
Three animals were used in the range-finding tests. Animal 1 was treated intradermally with concentrations of 1%, 1.5%, 2.5%, and 5% of the test item dissolved in cotton seed oil. Animal 2 was treated topically with 50% and 100% of the test item dissolved in vaseline for 24 h. Animal 3 was treated equivalent to animal 2 for 48 h. Based on the results a concentration of 5% was chosen for the intradermal application of the main test. This concentration caused slight signs of irritation, without leading to systemic effects. A concentration of 100% was found to be the highest concentration that did not cause any signs of irritation after topical treatment.

MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 2 (intradermal and epicutaneous)
- Exposure period: single injection (intradermal) and 48 h (epicutaneous)
- Test groups:
Intradermal (3 pairs of injections):
Injection 1: a 1:1 mixture (v/v) FCA/physiological saline 0.9% NaCl
Injection 2: test substance (5%) in cotton seed oil
Injection 3: test substance (5%) in a 1:1 mixture (v/v) FCA/physiological saline 0.9% NaCl
Epicutaneous: 100% test substance (0.5 g)
- Control group:
Intradermal (3 pairs of injections):
Injection 1: a 1:1 mixture (v/v) FCA/physiological saline 0.9% NaCl
Injection 2: 100% cotton seed oil
Injection 3: a 50% (v/v) formulation of cotton seed oil in a 1:1 mixture (v/v) FCA/physiological saline 0.9% NaCl
Epicutaneous: 100% vaseline
- Site: shoulder region
- Frequency of applications: every 7 days
- Duration: day 0-7
- Concentrations: intradermal 5%, epicutaneous 100%

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day of challenge: 20
- Exposure period: 24 h
- Test groups: 0.5 g of test item (100%)
- Control group: 0.5 g of test item (100%)
- Site: left flank (test item), right flank (vehicle)
- Concentrations: 100%
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 and 48 h

Challenge controls:
The control group is actually a challenge control.
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
reliability check with mercaptobenzothiazole

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
The positive control substance (induction 1: 15%; induction 2: 25%; challenge: 15% mercaptobenzothiazole) induced positive reactions in 10/10 animals (100%), thus meeting the reliability criteria for the GPMT.

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
5%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
5%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
5%
No. with + reactions:
2
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 2.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
5%
No. with + reactions:
2
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 2.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Summary of sensitisation after challenge in comparison to control animals

 

Erythema reaction (grade 0-3)

Oedema reaction (grade 0-3)

 

 

E0

E1

E2

E3

O0

O1

O2

O3

Sensitised animals (%)

Treated animals after 24 h

8

2

-

-

10

-

-

-

20

Treated animals after 48 h

8

2

-

-

10

-

-

-

20

Controls after 24 h

5

-

-

-

5

-

-

-

0

Controls after 48 h

5

-

-

-

5

-

-

-

0

 

Absolute body weights in g (Test group)

Test group

Date

Animal No.

 

T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

T6

T7

T8

T9

T10

2012-04-24

377

396

383

402

383

441

414

452

415

455

2012-05-18

488

506

522

490

500

573

528

626

543

585

Weight gain

111

110

139

88

117

132

114

164

128

130

 

Absolute body weights in g (Control group)

Control group

Date

Animal No.

 

T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

2012-04-24

467

464

435

417

369

2012-05-18

618

612

605

564

470

Weight gain

151

148

170

147

101

 

Grading of reactions in the preliminary test (intradermal)

Animal No.

Conc. (%)

E (24 h)

O (24 h)

E (48 h)

O 48 (h)

E (72 h)

O (72 h)

1

5

E1

O1

E1

O1

E1

O1

 

2.5

E1

O1

E1

O1

E1

nsf

1

1.5

E1

nsf

E1

nsf

E1

nsf

 

1

E1

nsf

E1

nsf

E1

nsf

E: erythema (grade 0 -3); O: Oedema (grade 0 -3); nsf: no specific findings

Grading of reactions in the preliminary test (epicutaneous)

Animal No.

Conc. (%)

E (24 h)

O (24 h)

E (48 h)

O 48 (h)

E (72 h)

O (72 h)

2 (24-h exposure)

100

nsf

nsf

nsf

nsf

nsf

nsf

50

nsf

nsf

nsf

nsf

nsf

nsf

1(48-h exposure)

100

nsf

nsf

nsf

nsf

nsf

nsf

50

nsf

nsf

nsf

nsf

nsf

nsf

E: erythema (grade 0 -3); O: Oedema (grade 0 -3); nsf: no specific findings

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU