Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Toxicity to reproduction

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2019
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2019
Report date:
2019

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 421 (Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
Version / remarks:
2016
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
PTPA
IUPAC Name:
PTPA
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): (CF3CF2CF2)3N, PTPA, 338-83-0
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: 3M Company, Batch 3435912
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 07 July, 2021
- Purity test date: 12 December, 2017
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature
- Stability under test conditions: Stable
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: NA, dosed neat
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING : None, dosed neat.

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Details on species / strain selection:
The strain is recommended per OECD 421.
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Deutschland, Sulzfeld, Germany or Charles River Laboratories France, L'Arbresle Cedex, France
- Females (if applicable) nulliparous and non-pregnant: Yes
- Age at study initiation: 10-12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: Males: 250-350 g, Females: 200-250 g
- Fasting period before study: None
- Housing: On arrival and following the pretest (females only) and pre-mating period, animals will be group housed (up to 5 animals of the same sex and same dosing group together) in polycarbonate cages (Macrolon, MIV type, height 18 cm). During the mating phase, males and females will be cohabitated on a 1:1 basis in Macrolon plastic cages (MIII type, height 18 cm). During the post-mating phase, males will be housed in their home cage (Macrolon plastic cages, MIV type, height 18 cm) with a maximum of 5 males/cage. Females will be individually housed in Macrolon plastic cages (MIIItype, height 18 cm). During the lactation phase, females will be housed in Macrolon plastic cages (MIII type, height 18 cm). Pups will be housed with the dam. The cages will contain appropriate bedding (Lignocel S 8-15, JRS - J.Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH + CO. KG, Rosenberg, Germany) and will be equipped with water bottles. The housing conditions will be maintained unless deemed inappropriate by the Study Director and/or Clinical Veterinarian. The room(s) in which the animals will be kept will be documented in the study records. Animals will be separated during designated procedures/activities. Each cage will be clearly labeled with a color-coded cage card indicating Test Facility Study No., group, animal number(s), and sex.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Pelleted rodent diet (SM R/M-Z from SSNIFF® Spezialdiäten GmbH, Soest, Germany) will be provided ad libitum throughout the study, except during designated procedures. The feed is analyzed by the supplier for nutritional components and environmental contaminants. Results
of the analysis are provided by the supplier and are on file at the Test Facility. It is considered that there are no known contaminants in the feed that would interfere with the objectives of the study.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Municipal tap water will be freely available to each animal via water bottles. Periodic analysis of the water is performed, and results of these analyses are on file at the Test Facility. It is considered that there are no known contaminants in the water that would interfere with
the objectives of the study.
- Acclimation period: At least 5 days.

DETAILS OF FOOD AND WATER QUALITY: See diet and water sections above.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18-24
- Humidity (%): 40-70
- Air changes (per hr): At least 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 02 January, 2019 To: 21 March, 2019

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: The test item, MTDID 42916 was administered via oral gavage as received. An adequate amount of the test item was dispensed into daily aliquots, which were stored at room temperature.

- VEHICLE : None
Details on mating procedure:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1:1
- Length of cohabitation: Maximum 14 days
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug / sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: No
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged (how): Individually
- Any other deviations from standard protocol: None
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
no
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
The test item was used as received from the Sponsor; therefore, samples for dose formulation analysis were not collected by the Test Facility.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
The test item (and Elix water for the control group) was administered to the appropriate animals by once daily oral gavage 7 days a week for a minimum of 28 days. Males were treated for 29 days, up to and during the mating period. Females that delivered were treated for 51-64 days, i.e. 14 days prior to mating (with the objective to cover at least two complete estrous cycles), the variable time to conception, the duration of pregnancy and at least 13 days after delivery, up to and including the day before scheduled necropsy. Females which failed to deliver were treated for 40-54 days.
Frequency of treatment:
Daily
Details on study schedule:
From the mating period onwards, the following parameters were recorded for each female:
male number paired with, mating date, confirmation of pregnancy and delivery day.

Females were allowed to litter normally. Postnatal day (PND) 1 is defined as the day when a litter is found completed (i.e. membranes and placentas cleaned up, nest built and/or feeding of pups started). The day prior to PND 1 is considered to be the day when the female started to deliver and is defined as PND 0 and used for recording of delivery. Females that were littering were left undisturbed.

Cage debris of pregnant females was examined for evidence of premature delivery and pregnant females were examined to detect signs of difficult or prolonged parturition or deficiencies in maternal care.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Dose / conc.:
0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Remarks:
Elix water control (Group 1)
Dose / conc.:
100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Remarks:
Group 2
Dose / conc.:
300 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Remarks:
Group 3
Dose / conc.:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Remarks:
Group 4
No. of animals per sex per dose:
10
Control animals:
yes, sham-exposed
Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale: Other repeated dose studies.
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): Random
- Rationale for selecting satellite groups: NA
- Post-exposure recovery period in satellite groups: NA
Positive control:
None

Examinations

Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Throughout the study, animals were observed for general health/mortality and moribundity twice daily, in the morning and at the end of the working day. Animals were not removed from the cage during observation, unless necessary for identification or confirmation of possible findings.

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Clinical observations were performed once daily, beginning during the first administration of the test item and lasting throughout the dosing periods up to the day prior to necropsy. During the dosing period, these observations were performed directly after dosing. The time of onset, grade and duration of any observed sign was recorded. Signs were graded for severity and the maximum grade was predefined at 3 or 4. Grades were coded as slight (grade 1), moderate (grade 2), severe (grade 3) and very severe (grade 4). For certain signs, only its presence (grade 1) or absence (grade 0) was scored. In the data tables, the scored grades were reported, as well as the percentage of animals affected in summary tables.

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Animals were weighed individually on the first day of treatment (prior to dosing), and weekly thereafter. Mated females were weighed on Days 0, 4, 7, 11, 14, 17, and 20 post-coitum and during lactation on PND 1, 4, 7, and 13. Thirteen days after start of mating
additional body weights were determined from females Nos. 59, 64 and 74 to check their pregnancy status because of the absence of evidence of mating. A terminal body weight was recorded on the day of scheduled necropsy.

FOOD CONSUMPTION: Food consumption was quantitatively measured weekly, except for males and females which were housed together for mating and for females without evidence of mating. Food consumption of mated females was measured on Days 0, 4, 7, 11, 14, 17, and 20 post-coitum
and during lactation on PND 1, 4, 7, and 13.

WATER CONSUMPTION: Subjective appraisal was maintained during the study, but no quantitative investigation was introduced as no effect was suspected.

OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No

HAEMATOLOGY: No

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood:
Blood of F0-animals was collected on the day of scheduled necropsy. F0-males were fasted over night with a maximum of 24 hours before blood sampling, but water was available. F0-females were not fasted overnight. Blood of F1-animals was collected on PND 4 and PND 14-16, if possible. This
was performed in the necropsy room.
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: Yes (Isofluorane)
- Animals fasted: Males were fasted, females were not
- How many animals:
All F0 animals and F1 animals at culling. On PND 14-16 separate blood samples were collected from two pups per litter (from one male and one female).
- Parameters checked: Serum T4 levels

URINALYSIS: No

NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No

IMMUNOLOGY: No
Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
Estrous cycles were evaluated by examining the vaginal cytology of samples obtained by vaginal lavage. Daily vaginal lavage was performed for all females beginning 14 days prior to treatment (pretest period), the first 14 days of treatment and during mating until evidence of copulation was observed. Vaginal lavage was continued for those females with no evidence of copulation until termination of the mating period. On the day of necropsy, a vaginal lavage was also taken to determine the stage of estrous.
Sperm parameters (parental animals):
Parameters examined in [F0] male parental generations:
testis weight, epididymis weight
Litter observations:
STANDARDISATION OF LITTERS
- Performed on day 4 postpartum: Yes, on PND 4, the surplus pups (> 8 pups per litter) were euthanized by decapitation. From two surplus pups per litter, blood was collected, if possible.

PARAMETERS EXAMINED
The following parameters were examined in F1 offspring:
Pups were observed daily for general health/mortality. The number of live and dead pups was determined on PND 1 and daily thereafter. Pups were not removed from the cage during observation, unless necessary for identification or confirmation of possible findings. Pups showing pain, distress or discomfort which was considered not transient in nature or was likely to become more severe, were sacrificed for humane reasons based on OECD guidance document on humane endpoints (ENV/JM/MONO/ 2000/7). The circumstances of any death were recorded in detail.Live pups were weighed individually on PND 1, 4, 7 and 13. Sex was externally determined for all pups on PND 1 and 4. Anogenital distance (AGD) was measured for all live pups on PND 1. The AGD was normalized to the cube root of body weight. All male pups in each litter were examined for the number of areola/nipples on PND 13.

GROSS EXAMINATION OF DEAD PUPS:
Yes, for external and internal abnormalities; possible cause of death was not determined for pups born or found dead.]

ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROTOXICITY: None

ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL IMMUNOTOXICITY: None
Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes, All animals were subjected to a full post mortem examination, with special attention being paid to the reproductive organs. Necropsy procedures were performed by qualified personnel with appropriate training and experience in animal anatomy and gross pathology. A vet
erinary pathologist, or other suitably qualified person, was available. The numbers of former implantation sites were recorded for all paired females. In case no macroscopically visible implantation sites were present, non-gravid uteri were stained using the Salewski technique in order to detect any
former implantation sites and the number of corpora lutea was recorded in addition.

HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
The following tissues were embedded in paraffin, sectioned, mounted on glass slides, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin:
All animals: Gross lesions/masses
All animals of Groups 1-4: Epididymis, coagulation gland, prostate gland, seminal vesicle gland, thyroid gland, ovaries, testes
Postmortem examinations (offspring):
The following parameters were examined in F1 offspring:
Pups were observed daily for general health/mortality. The number of live and dead pups was determined on PND 1 and daily thereafter. Pups were not removed from the cage during observation, unless necessary for identification or confirmation of possible findings. Pups showing pain, distress or discomfort which was considered not transient in nature or was likely to become more severe, were sacrificed for humane reasons based on OECD guidance document on humane endpoints (ENV/JM/MONO/ 2000/7). The circumstances of any death were recorded in detail.Live pups were weighed individually on PND 1, 4, 7 and 13. Sex was externally determined for all pups on PND 1 and 4. Anogenital distance (AGD) was measured for all live pups on PND 1. The AGD was normalized to the cube root of body weight. All male pups in each litter were examined for the number of areola/nipples on PND 13.
Statistics:
All statistical tests were conducted at the 5% significance level. All pairwise comparisons were conducted using two sided tests and were reported at the 1% or 5% levels. Numerical data collected on scheduled occasions for the listed variables were analyzed as indicated according to sex and occasion. Descriptive statistics number, mean and standard deviation (or %CV or SE when deemed appropriate) were reported whenever possible.
Reproductive indices:
Mating index, precoital time, fertility index, gestation index, duration of gestation, lactation index
Offspring viability indices:
Post-implationation survival index, live birth index, percentatge life males at first litter check, percentage live females at first litter check, viability index.

Results and discussion

Results: P0 (first parental generation)

General toxicity (P0)

Clinical signs:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
One male (no.24, Group 3) showed abnormal gait during the last week of mating (fourth week of treatment). In the study files it was recorded that it did not properly used its hind legs. A few days before planned necropsy, veterinary inspection was conducted on this male. It was noted that it had its ears moved backwards and a rough fur, possible indications of pain. Moreover, a slight body weight loss was observed during the two weeks mating period. Furthermore, the male didn’t succeed in successful mating with its female partner. The cause of the injury of the hind legs was unknown, but might be related to the other findings in this male. It was considered an incidental finding that was not related to treatment. Alopecia noted in a single female (no. 56, Group 2) during the lactation phase occurred within the range of background findings to be expected for rats of this age and strain which are housed and treated under the conditions in this study.
In the absence of a dose-related trend and at the incidence observed, these findings in a single male and female were considered to be incidental findings and of no toxicological significance.
Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
not examined
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Description (incidence):
No mortality occurred during the study period.
Body weight and weight changes:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Body weights and body weight gain were considered to have been unaffected by treatment. In high dose males, a slightly lower body weight gain was observed after treatment at 1000 mg/kg/day, achieving levels of statistical significance on several occasions when compared to controls. However, the average body weight gain in high dose animals was normal in comparison with the historical control data for rats of this strain and age, whereas that in control males was slightly higher than expected. Since the difference in mean body weights between control and high dose males did not exceed 3% during the study, no toxicological significance was attached to this finding. In high dose females at 1000 mg/kg/day, the mean body weights were slightly lower when compared to controls throughout the study, achieving a level of statistical significance on some occasions, i.e. Day 4 and 7 post coitum and Day 1 of lactation. However, during the study the relative difference in mean body weights varied from approximately 2% to 5% between controls and high dose females, indicating that the body weight gain was comparable between the two groups. Since the relative differences in mean body weights between controls and high dose females were similar at start and at the end of the study (i.e. approximately 3% lower), no toxicological significance was attached to this finding.
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Food consumption before or after correction for body weight in the high dose group at 1000 mg/kg/day (Group 4) was similar to the control group (Group 1) over the treatment period.
Food efficiency:
not examined
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not examined
Ophthalmological findings:
not examined
Haematological findings:
not examined
Clinical biochemistry findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Serum levels of T4 in F0 males were considered not to be affected by treatment.
Urinalysis findings:
not examined
Behaviour (functional findings):
not examined
Immunological findings:
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
There were no test item-related microscopic observations.
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
There were no test item-related microscopic observations.

Reproductive function / performance (P0)

Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Length and regularity of the estrous cycle were considered not to have been affected by treatment.
Reproductive function: sperm measures:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
No test article-related changes were observed in the testes, epididymis, or spermatogenic profiling.
Reproductive performance:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
No reproductive indices were impacted by treatment.

Effect levels (P0)

Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
ca. 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
clinical signs
mortality
body weight and weight gain
clinical biochemistry
organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
gross pathology
histopathology: non-neoplastic
histopathology: neoplastic
reproductive function (oestrous cycle)
reproductive function (sperm measures)
reproductive performance

Target system / organ toxicity (P0)

Key result
Critical effects observed:
no

Results: F1 generation

General toxicity (F1)

Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
No clinical signs occurred among pups that were considered to be related to treatment.
Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
not examined
Mortality / viability:
no mortality observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Litter size was considered not affected by treatment.
The mean number of living pups per litter at first litter check were 10.5 and 12.4 for the control and 1000 mg/kg/day groups, respectively.
Body weight and weight changes:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
After similar mean body weights at birth (PND 1), a small difference became apparent in male and female pups between the control and high dose groups during the lactation period. On PND 13, approximately 10% lower mean body weights were observed in high dose male and female pups, achieving a level of statistical significance when compared to the concurrent controls. Since body weight gain in high dose pups was in the same range as the historical control data for pups of this strain and age, and that in the control pups was slightly higher, the difference in mean body weight between these groups was considered not treatment related and of no toxicological relevance. A relation with the slightly lower litter size in the control group is suspected.
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
not examined
Food efficiency:
not examined
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not examined
Ophthalmological findings:
not examined
Haematological findings:
no effects observed
Clinical biochemistry findings:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Serum T4 levels in male and female PND 14-16 pups were slightly higher in the high dose group at 1000 mg/kg/day, not achieving levels of statistical significance when compared to controls and also remained within the range of historical control data for rat-pups of this age and strain.
Urinalysis findings:
not examined
Sexual maturation:
not examined
Anogenital distance (AGD):
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Anogenital distance (absolute and normalized for body weight) in male and female pups was considered not to be affected by treatment.

Treatment at 1000 mg/kg/day had no effect on areola/nipple retention. For none of the examined male pups nipples were observed at PND 13.
Nipple retention in male pups:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Anogenital distance (absolute and normalized for body weight) in male and female pups was considered not to be affected by treatment.

Treatment at 1000 mg/kg/day had no effect on areola/nipple retention. For none of the examined male pups nipples were observed at PND 13.
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
not examined
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
No treatment-related macroscopic findings were noted among pups at sacrifice.
Histopathological findings:
not examined
Other effects:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Anogenital distance (absolute and normalized for body weight) in male and female pups was considered not to be affected by treatment.

Treatment at 1000 mg/kg/day had no effect on areola/nipple retention. For none of the examined male pups nipples were observed at PND 13.

Developmental neurotoxicity (F1)

Behaviour (functional findings):
not examined

Developmental immunotoxicity (F1)

Developmental immunotoxicity:
not examined

Effect levels (F1)

Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Generation:
F1
Effect level:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
viability
clinical signs
mortality
body weight and weight gain
clinical biochemistry
gross pathology

Target system / organ toxicity (F1)

Key result
Critical effects observed:
no

Overall reproductive toxicity

Key result
Reproductive effects observed:
no

Any other information on results incl. tables

Male Body Weights (Grams) Summary

 

 

Group 1 (Control)

Group 4 (1000 mg/kg)

Pre-Mating

 

 

 

Day 1

Mean

288

286

 

Standard Deviation

7.9

8.1

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Day 8

Mean

319

312

 

Standard Deviation

10.9

8.7

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Mating Period

 

 

 

Day 1

Mean

340

330

 

Standard Deviation

13.5

10.1

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Day 8

Mean

352

343

 

Standard Deviation

15.9

10

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Day 15

Mean

368

357

 

Standard Deviation

16.1

8.9

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

 */** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level

Male Body Weight Gain (%) Summary

 

 

Group 1 (Control)

Group 4 (1000 mg/kg)

Pre-Mating

 

 

 

Day 1

Mean

0

0

 

Standard Deviation

0.0

0.0

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Day 8

Mean

11

9*

 

Standard Deviation

1.9

1.7

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Mating Period

 

 

 

Day 1

Mean

18

16*

 

Standard Deviation

3.2

1.4

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Day 8

Mean

22

20

 

Standard Deviation

3.3

2.2

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Day 15

Mean

28

25*

 

Standard Deviation

3.6

2.2

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level

Historical Control Data – Male Body Weights (Grams)

Days

Mean

Std. Dev.

N

P5

P95

1

291

16.8

580

270.0

317.0

8

315

18.2

575

289.0

345.0

15

335

21.0

575

303.0

369.0

22

346

22.5

574

312.0

386.0

29

361

25.5

563

322.0

402.0

Historical Control Data – Male Body Weight Gain (%)

Days

Mean

Std. Dev.

N

P5

P95

1

0

0.0

580

0.0

0.0

8

8

2.5

575

4.0

12.4

15

15

3.9

575

8.8

21.4

22

19

4.9

574

11.7

27.2

29

24

6.2

563

13.8

33.8

Female Body Weights (Grams) Summary

 

 

Group 1 (Control)

Group 4 (1000 mg/kg)

Pre-Mating

 

 

 

Day 1

Mean

225

218

 

Standard Deviation

9.9

10.7

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Day 8

Mean

227

226

 

Standard Deviation

9.4

9.8

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Mating Period

 

 

 

Day 1

Mean

236

230

 

Standard Deviation

8.3

11.6

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Day 8

Mean

 

-

 

Standard Deviation

 

-

 

N

0 x

0 x

 

 

 

 

Day 15

Mean

 

-

 

Standard Deviation

 

-

 

N

0 x

0 x

 

 

 

 

Day 22

Mean

 

-

 

Standard Deviation

 

-

 

N

0 x

0 x

 

 

 

 

Post-Coitum

 

 

 

Day 0

Mean

237

228

 

Standard Deviation

8.5

10.9

 

N

8

9

 

 

 

 

Day 4

Mean

252

239*

 

Standard Deviation

11.4

10.8

 

N

8

9

 

 

 

 

Day 7

Mean

257

246*

 

Standard Deviation

11.0

10.8

 

N

8

9

 

 

 

 

Day 11

Mean

271

260

 

Standard Deviation

12.8

11.5

 

N

8

9

 

 

 

 

Day 14

Mean

281

271

 

Standard Deviation

13.6

13.6

 

N

8

9

 

 

 

 

Day 17

Mean

302

291

 

Standard Deviation

14.8

14.8

 

N

8

9

 

 

 

 

Day 20

Mean

340

327

 

Standard Deviation

19.3

16.9

 

N

8

9

 

 

 

 

Lactation

 

 

 

Day 1

Mean

267

252*

 

Standard Deviation

15.0

13.4

 

N

8

10

 

 

 

 

Day 4

Mean

279

270

 

Standard Deviation

8.1

15.9

 

N

8

10

 

 

 

 

Day 7

Mean

289

282

 

Standard Deviation

13.3

12.6

 

N

8

10

 

 

 

 

Day 13

Mean

304

294

 

Standard Deviation

16.2

13.3

 

N

8

10

 

 

 

 

X- Body weights excluded during mating period.

*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level

Female Body Weight Gain (%) Summary

 

 

Group 1 (Control)

Group 4 (1000 mg/kg)

Pre-Mating

 

 

 

Day 1

Mean

0

0

 

Standard Deviation

0.0

0.0

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Day 8

Mean

1

3

 

Standard Deviation

2.5

1.7

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Mating Period

 

 

 

Day 1

Mean

5

5

 

Standard Deviation

2.6

2.3

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Day 8

Mean

 

-

 

Standard Deviation

 

-

 

N

0 x

0 x

 

 

 

 

Day 15

Mean

 

-

 

Standard Deviation

 

-

 

N

0 x

0 x

 

 

 

 

Day 22

Mean

 

-

 

Standard Deviation

 

-

 

N

0 x

0 x

 

 

 

 

Post-Coitum

 

 

 

Day 0

Mean

0

0

 

Standard Deviation

0.0

0.0

 

N

8

9

 

 

 

 

Day 4

Mean

7

5

 

Standard Deviation

3.1

1.3

 

N

8

9

 

 

 

 

Day 7

Mean

9

8

 

Standard Deviation

3.4

1.7

                       

N

8

9

 

 

 

 

Day 11

Mean

14

14

 

Standard Deviation

4.1

3.1

 

N

8

9

 

 

 

 

Day 14

Mean

19

19

 

Standard Deviation

4.1

3.5

 

N

8

9

 

 

 

 

Day 17

Mean

28

28

 

Standard Deviation

4.5

3.4

 

N

8

9

 

 

 

 

Day 20

Mean

44

43

 

Standard Deviation

6.5

4.8

 

N

8

9

 

 

 

 

Lactation

 

 

 

Day 1

Mean

0

0

 

Standard Deviation

0.0

0.0

 

N

8

10

 

 

 

 

Day 4

Mean

5

7

 

Standard Deviation

4.5

1.9

 

N

8

10

 

 

 

 

Day 7

Mean

8

12*

 

Standard Deviation

4.3

1.7

 

N

8

10

 

 

 

 

Day 13

Mean

14

17

 

Standard Deviation

3.7

3.8

 

N

8

10

 

 

 

 

X- Body weights excluded during mating period.

*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level

Historical Control Data – Female Body Weights (Grams)

Days

Mean

Std. Dev.

N

P5

P95

1

220

11.6

475

201.0

238.0

8

224

12.0

474

205.0

243.0

15

230

12.3

474

209.0

250.0

22

253

13.9

31

234.0

277.0

29

260

19.1

21

233.0

287.0

Historical Control Data – Female Body Weight Gain (%)

Days

Mean

Std. Dev.

N

P5

P95

1

0

0.0

475

0.0

0.0

8

2

2.9

474

-1.9

6.4

15

4

3.5

474

-0.8

10.1

22

12

3.9

31

6.2

17.9

29

15

4.9

21

9.8

23.6

Clinical Biochemistry Summary - Males

 

 

Group 1 (Control)

Group 4 (1000 mg/kg)

End of Treatment

 

 

 

TSH

Mean

-

-

ulU/mL

Standard Deviation

-

-

 

N

0

0

 

 

 

 

Total T4

Mean

4.22

4.75

ug/dL

Standard Deviation

0.96

0.90

 

N

10

10

Macroscopic Findings Summary - Males

 

Group 1 (Control)

Group 4 (1000 mg/kg)

End of Treatment

 

 

Animals Examined

10

10

Animals without findings

9

5

 

 

 

Animals affected

1

5

 

 

 

Epididymides (Nodule(s))

0

3

Coagulating Glands

 

 

   Left side: Mishshapen

0

1

   Agenesis

0

1

Thyroid Gland (Enlarged)

0

1

Iliac lymph Node (Englarged)

0

1

Eyes (Exophthalmus)

1

0

Macroscopic Findings Summary - Females

 

Group 1 (Control)

Group 4 (1000 mg/kg)

End of Treatment

 

 

Animals Examined

10

10

Animals without findings

5

9

 

 

 

Animals Affected

5

1

 

 

 

Uterus

 

 

   Contains fluid

2

0

Thyroid Gland

 

 

  Discoloration

1

0

Adrenal Gland

 

 

   Discoloration

0

1

Mandibular lymph node

 

 

   Focus/foci

4

0

Organ Weights (Gram) Summary - Males

 

 

Group 1 (Control)

Group 4 (1000 mg/kg)

End of Treatment

 

 

 

Body Weight

Mean

347

338

 

Standard Deviation

16

8

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Liver

Mean

8.45

8.17

 

Standard Deviation

0.46

0.35

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thyroids

Mean

0.016

0.017

 

Standard Deviation

0.003

0.004

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Testes

Mean

3.27

3.43

 

Standard Deviation

0.28

0.23

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Prostate Gland

Mean

0.801

0.753

 

Standard Deviation

0.094

0.108

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Epididymides

Mean

1.085

1.130

 

Standard Deviation

0.108

0.070

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Seminal Vesicles

Mean

1.256

1.256

 

Standard Deviation

0.202

0.229

 

N

10

10

Organ/Body Weight Ratios (%) Summary - Males

 

 

Group 1 (Control)

Group 4 (1000 mg/kg)

End of Treatment

 

 

 

Body Weight

Mean

347

338

(Gram)

Standard Deviation

16

8

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Liver (%)

Mean

2.44

2.42

 

Standard Deviation

0.18

0.07

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Thyroids (%)

Mean

0.005

0.005

 

Standard Deviation

0.001

0.001

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Testes (%)

Mean

0.94

1.02

 

Standard Deviation

0.10

0.08

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Prostate Gland (%)

Mean

0.231

0.223

 

Standard Deviation

0.032

0.032

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Epididymides (%)

Mean

0.312

0.334

 

Standard Deviation

0.029

0.020

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Seminal Vesicles (%)

Mean

0.363

0.372

 

Standard Deviation

0.066

0.067

 

N

10

10

Organ Weights (Gram) Summary - Females

 

 

Group 1 (Control)

Group 4 (1000 mg/kg)

End of Treatment

 

 

 

Body Weight

Mean

292

291

 

Standard Deviation

30

16

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Liver

Mean

11.6

12.01

 

Standard Deviation

2.48

1.17

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Thyroids

Mean

0.015

0.014

 

Standard Deviation

0.003

0.003

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Ovaries

Mean

0.127

0.118

 

Standard Deviation

0.031

0.018

 

N

10

10

Organ/Body Weight Ratios (%) Summary- Females

 

 

Group 1 (Control)

Group 4 (1000 mg/kg)

End of Treatment

 

 

 

Body Weight (grams)

Mean

292

291

 

Standard Deviation

30

16

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Liver (%)

Mean

3.93

4.12

 

Standard Deviation

0.50

0.32

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Thyroids (%)

Mean

0.005

0.005

 

Standard Deviation

0.001

0.001

 

N

10

10

 

 

 

 

Ovaries (%)

Mean

0.045

0.040

 

Standard Deviation

0.017

0.006

 

N

10

10

Reproduction Data Summary

 

 

 

Group 1 (Control)

Group 4 (1000 mg/kg)

Females Paired

10

10

Females Mated

10

10

Pregnant Females

8

10

Females with living pups on day 1

8

10

Mating Index (%)

100

100

Fertility Index (%)

80

100

Gestation Index (%)

100

100

Precoital Time – F0 Post Coitum

 

 

Day of the Pairing Period

Group 1 (Control)

Group 4 (1000 mg/kg)

1

6

1

2

1

6

3

1

3

4

2

-

Median Precoital Time

1

2

Mean Precoital Time

1.9

2.2

N

10

10

Implantation Sites Summary

 

 

 

At Necropsy

 

Group 1 (Control)

Group 4 (1000 mg/kg)

Implantations

Mean

12.5

13.4

 

Standard Deviation

3.7

2.3

 

N

8

10

F0-Generation - Lactation

 

 

 

Group 1 (Control)

Group 4 (1000 mg/kg)

Litters – Total

8

10

 

 

 

Duration of Gestation

 

 

Mean (+)

21.4

21.8

Standard Deviation

0.5

0.4

N

8

10

 

 

 

Dead Pups and First Litter Check

 

 

Litters Affected (#)

0

0

Total

0

0

Mean (+)

0.0

0.0

Standard Deviation

0.0

0.0

N

8

10

 

 

 

Living Pups and First Litter Check

 

 

% of Males/Females (#)

46/54

46/54

Total

84

124

Mean (+)

10.5

12.4

Standard Deviation

3.2

2.2

N

8

10

 

 

 

Postnatal Loss

 

 

% of Living Pups

1.2

0.0

Litters Affected (#)

1

0

Total (#)

1

0

Mean (+)

0.1

0.0

Standard Deviation

0.4

0.0

N

8

10

 

 

 

Culled Pups

 

 

Total

23

44

 

 

 

Living Pups Day 4 P.P.

 

 

Total

60

80

Mean (+)

7.5

8.0

Standard Deviation

1.4

0.0

N

8

10

 

 

 

Breeding Loss Days 5-13 P.P.

 

 

% of Living Pups at Day 4 P.P.

1.7

0.0

Litters Affected (#)

1

0

Total

1

0

Mean (+)

0.1

0.0

Standard Deviation

0.4

0.0

N

8

10

 

 

 

Living Pups Day 13 P.P.

 

 

% of Males/Females (#)

46/54

45/55

Total

59

80

Mean (+)

7.4

8.0

Standard Deviation

1.4

0.0

N

8

10

*100+/++ Steel-test significant at 5% (+) or 1% (++) level

# / ## Fisher's Exact test significant at 5% (#) or 1% (##) level

 

 

Developmental Data

 

 

 

Group 1 (Control)

Group 4 (1000 mg/kg)

Total number of offspring born

84

124

Total number of uterine implantation sites

100

134

Number of live offspring on Day 1 (after littering)

84

124

Number of live offspring on Day 4 (before culling)

83

124

Number of live offspring on Day 4 (after culling)

60

80

Number of live offspring on Day 13 after littering

59

80

Post-implantation survival index (%)

84

93

Live birth index (%)

100

100

Viability index (%)

99

100

Lactation index (%)

98

100

Body Weights of Pups (Grams)

 

 

 

 

Day

Sex

 

Group 1 (Control)

Group 4 (1000 mg/kg)

1

M

Mean

6.5

6.6

 

 

St. Dev.

0.8

0.7

 

 

N

8

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

F

Mean

6.3

6.3

 

 

St. Dev.

0.8

0.6

 

 

N

8

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

M+F

Mean

6.4

6.4

 

 

St. Dev.

0.7

0.6

 

 

N

8

10

 

 

 

 

 

4

M

Mean

10.3

9.9

 

 

St. Dev.

1.5

1.3

 

 

N

8

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

F

Mean

10.0

9.4

 

 

St. Dev.

1.6

1.2

 

 

N

8

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

M+F

Mean

10.1

9.6

 

 

St. Dev.

1.5

1.2

 

 

N

8

10

 

 

 

 

 

7

M

Mean

17.2

16.4

 

 

St. Dev.

1.7

1.6

 

 

N

8

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

F

Mean

17.0

15.6

 

 

St. Dev.

2.1

1.4

 

 

N

8

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

M+F

Mean

17.0

16.0

 

 

St. Dev.

1.8

1.4

 

 

N

8

10

 

 

 

 

 

13

M

Mean

33.6

31.1

 

 

St. Dev.

3.1

2.6

 

 

N

8

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

F

Mean

33.2

30.0*

 

 

St. Dev.

3.5

1.8

 

 

N

8

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

M+F

Mean

33.3

30.5*

 

 

St. Dev.

3.1

2.2

 

 

N

8

10

*/** Dunnett-test based on pooled variance significant at 5% (*) or 1% (**) level

 

 

 

 

Historical Body Weights of Male Pups (Grams)

 

 

Day 1

Mean

6

 

Standard Deviation

0.07

 

N

2590

 

P5

5.3

 

P95

7.6

 

 

 

Day 4

Mean

10

 

Standard Deviation

1.3

 

N

2575

 

P5

7.7

 

P95

11.8

 

 

 

Day 7

Mean

16

 

Standard Deviation

1.8

 

N

1724

 

P5

13.3

 

P95

19.1

 

 

 

Day 13

Mean

31

 

Standard Deviation

2.7

 

N

1700

 

P5

26.4

 

P95

35.2

Historical Body Weights of Female Pups (Grams)

 

 

Day 1

Mean

6

 

Standard Deviation

0.7

 

N

2623

 

P5

5.0

 

P95

7.3

 

 

 

Day 4

Mean

9

 

Standard Deviation

1.3

 

N

2602

 

P5

7.3

 

P95

11.3

 

 

 

Day 7

Mean

16

 

Standard Deviation

1.8

 

N

1765

 

P5

12.8

 

P95

18.5

 

 

 

Day 13

Mean

30

 

Standard Deviation

2.7

 

N

1739

 

P5

25.7

 

P95

34.5

Anogenital Distance and Nipple Retention

 

 

 

F0- Generation - Lactation

 

Group 1 (Control)

Group 4 (1000 mg/kg)

Anogenital Dist. Male (mm)

Mean

2.66

 2.56

 

St. Dev.

0.16

 0.17

 

N

6

 10

 

 

 

 

Anogenital Dist. Female (mm)

Mean

1.08

 1.10

 

St. Dev.

0.04

 0.08

 

N

6

 10

 

 

 

 

Number of nipples

Mean

0.00

0.00

 

Median (+)

0.00

0.00

 

N

8

10

# / ## Fisher's Exact test significant at 5% (#) or 1% (##) level

 

 

 

+/++ Steel-test significant at 5% (+) or 1% (++) level

 

 

 

Corrected Anogenital Distance

 

 

 

 

 

Group 1 (Control)

Group 4 (1000 mg/kg)

PND 1

 

 

 

Norm anog dist – Male

Mean

1.42

1.36

mm

St. Dev.

0.06

0.06

 

N

6

10

 

 

 

 

Norm anog dist - Female

Mean

0.59

0.60

mm

St. Dev.

0.02

0.05

 

N

6

10

Clinical Biochemistry Summary – Male Pups

 

 

 

 

 

Group 1 (Control)

Group 4 (1000 mg/kg)

Pups (PND 14-16)

 

 

 

Total T4

Mean

6.22

7.3

ug/dL

St. Dev.

0.91

0.99

 

N

8

10

Clinical Biochemistry Summary – Female Pups

 

 

 

 

 

Group 1 (Control)

Group 4 (1000 mg/kg)

Pups (PND 14-16)

 

 

 

Total T4

Mean

5.61

6.48

ug/dL

St. Dev.

0.82

0.68

 

N

8

10

Number of animals with Microscopic findings by organ - Males

 

 

 

 

 

Group 1 (Control) (10 animals)

Group 2 (100 mg/kg) (10 animals)

Group 3 (300 mg/kg) (10 animals)

Group 4 (1000 mg/kg) (10 animals)

Thyroid Gland

10

-

-

10

  N.A.D.

7

-

-

6

  Hypertrophy foll

3

-

-

4

  Grade 1

3

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

Seminal Vesicles

10

-

-

10

  N.A.D.

10

-

-

10

 

 

 

 

 

Coagulating Glands

10

-

1

10

  N.A.D.

10

-

1

10

 

 

 

 

 

Prostate Gland

10

-

-

10

  N.A.D.

9

-

-

9

  Infiltrate inflamm.

1

-

-

1

  Grade 1

1

-

-

1

 

 

 

 

 

Testes

10

-

-

10

  N.A.D.

10

-

-

10

 

 

 

 

 

Epididymides

10

-

-

10

  N.A.D.

10

-

-

7

  Sperm Granuloma

-

-

-

3

  Grade 2

-

-

-

2

  Grade 3

-

-

-

1

 

 

 

 

 

Mandib. Lymph Nodes

-

-

1

-

  Hypertrophy Lymphoid

-

-

1

-

  Grade 1

-

-

1

-

 

 

 

 

 

Iliac Lymph Node

-

-

-

1

 Hyperplasia lymphoid

-

-

-

1

  Grade 2

-

-

-

1

 

 

 

 

 

Eyes

1

-

-

1

 Hemorrhage, retro

1

-

1

-

  Grade 2

-

-

1

-

  Grade 3

1

-

-

-

Number of animals with Microscopic findings by organ - Females

 

 

 

 

 

Group 1 (Control) (10 animals)

Group 2 (100 mg/kg) (10 animals)

Group 3 (300 mg/kg) (10 animals)

Group 4 (1000 mg/kg) (10 animals)

Thyroid Gland

10

-

2

10

  N.A.D.

9

-

2

9

  Hypertrophy foll

1

-

-

1

  Grade 1

1

-

-

1

 

 

 

 

 

Ovaries

10

-

-

10

 N.A.D.

10

-

-

10

 

 

 

 

 

Uterus

3

1

-

-

  N.A.D.

1

-

-

-

 Cyclic dilation

2

1

-

-

 

 

 

 

 

Cervix

3

-

-

-

  N.A.D.

3

-

-

-

 

 

 

 

 

Vagina

3

-

-

-

 N.A.D.

1

-

-

-

 Cycle: Proestrus

1

-

-

-

 Cycle: Estrus

1

-

-

-

 

 

 

 

 

Mandib. Lymph Nodes

4

-

-

-

 Congestion

4

-

-

-

  Grade 2

2

-

-

-

  Grade 3

2

-

-

-

 

 

 

 

 

Adrenal Glands

-

-

1

1

 N.A.D.

-

-

1

1

 

 

 

 

 

Thymus

-

-

1

-

 Congestion

-

-

1

-

  Grade 2

-

-

1

-

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Based on the results of the study, the parental and reproductive/developmental No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) is 1000 mg/kg/day.
Executive summary:

The reproductive/developmental and repeated dose toxicity of the test article was evaluated in male and female Wistar Han rats. The study was conducted according to OECD 421 in compliance with OECD GLP regulations. Rats (10/sex/dose) were dosed with 0 (control), 100, 300, or 1000 mg/kg/day via oral gavage for a minimum of 28 days. The following parameters and end points were evaluated in this study: mortality/moribundity, clinical signs, body weight and food consumption, estrous cycle determination, measurement of thyroid hormone T4 (F0-males), gross necropsy findings, organ weights and histopathologic examinations. In addition, the following reproduction/developmental parameters were determined: mating and fertility indices, precoital time, number of implantation sites, gestation index and duration, parturition, maternal care, sex ratio and early postnatal pup development, mortality, clinical signs, body weights, sex, anogenital distance, areola/nipple retention and macroscopy, measurement of thyroid hormone T4 (PND 14-16 pups)). Due to a dosing error occurring during the pre-mating period of the study, the animals of low and mid dose groups had received at least five 5 times less than intended. The results of these two groups were, therefore, excluded from interpretation. No parental toxicity was observed at the highest dose tested (1000 mg/kg/day). No adverse treatment-related changes were noted in any of the parameters investigated in this study (clinical appearance, body weight, food consumption, T4 thyroid hormone levels (in males only), macroscopic examination, organ weights, and microscopic examination. No treatment-related changes were noted in any of the reproductive parameters investigated (mating and fertility indices, precoital time, number of implantations, estrous cycle, spermatogenic profiling, and histopathological examination of reproductive organs). No treatment-related changes were noted in any of the developmental parameters investigated in this study (gestation, viability and lactation indices, duration of gestation, parturition, sex ratio, maternal care and early postnatal pup development consisting of mortality, clinical signs, body weight, anogenital distance, areola/nipple retention, T4 thyroid hormone levels and macroscopic examination). Based on the results of the study, the parental and reproductive/developmental No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) is 1000 mg/kg/day.