Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
August 7 - 10, 2007
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: 2007 GLP Guideline Study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2007
Report date:
2007

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
sodium cumene sulfonate
IUPAC Name:
sodium cumene sulfonate
Constituent 2
Reference substance name:
Sodium cumenesulphonate
EC Number:
248-983-7
EC Name:
Sodium cumenesulphonate
Cas Number:
28348-53-0
IUPAC Name:
sodium 2-phenylpropane-2-sulfonate
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): STEPANATE SCS-40-E (confirmed by sponsor as sodium cumene sulfonate (40%)
- Molecular formula (if other than submission substance): no data
- Physical state: clear liquid
- Analytical purity: 40%
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): no data
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: 40% active
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: no data
- Stability under test conditions: stable
- Storage condition of test material: no data
- Other:

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Kuiper Rabbitry, Gary, Indiana
- Age at study initiation: 8 - 10 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.40 - 2.77 Kg
- Housing: individually housed in steel cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: Conditioned for at least 5 days prior to study initiation. Maintained according to the recommendations contained in the "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals", National Academy Press, 1996.


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 16 - 22
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): "light controlled"


IN-LIFE DATES: From: August 7, 2007 To: August 10, 2007

Test system

Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not specified
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit):0.5 gram
- Concentration (if solution): undiluted; test substance is 40% active ingredient


VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): no vehicle
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 hours; after which excess test material was removed from the site
Observation period:
30 minutes and 24, 48 and 72 hours after patches were removed
Number of animals:
3 (females)
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 6 sq cm
- % coverage:
- Type of wrap if used: 2 layer gauze patch covered with semiocclusive plastic overwrop held in place with Kendall Curity Standard Porous Tape


REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): excess removed
- Time after start of exposure: 4 hours


SCORING SYSTEM: Draize

Results and discussion

In vivo

Results
Irritation parameter:
primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 72 hours
Score:
>= 0.25
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 24 hours
Irritant / corrosive response data:
The maximum skin irritation score was 1.0 at the 4.5 hour observation.
Other effects:
Final body weights were within expected values.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: OECD GHS
Conclusions:
Not irritating