Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 406-640-0 | CAS number: 136920-07-5 KEROFLUX ES 3241
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information
Local effects
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Additional information - workers
No systemic effects have been observed in rodent studies after short-term and long-term exposure to Keroflux ES 3241. The LD50 for acute oral and acute dermal exposure is >2000 mg/kg bw and based on the physical chemical properties and the use of Keroflux ES 3241 an inhalation exposure is unlikely. Thus, derivation of a DNEL for acute / short-term exposure is not appropriate according to Chapter R8 of the ECHA guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment (2008).
Keroflux ES 3241 has been tested postive for skin sensitization in a guinea-pig maximization test. Because of the single induction dose regime employed the maximization test does not allow to derive a starting point for DNEL derivation. Based on the potency considerations in chapter R8 of the ECHA guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment (2008) Keroflux ES 3241 can be considered rather a moderate skin sensitizer by taking into account the concentration for intradermal induction (> 1%) as well as the incidence of sensitization (> 60%). Since the data availabe do not allow for a DNEL derivation the operational conditions and risk management measures are installed to ensure that the exposure to Keroflux ES 3241 is as low as possible.
DNEL - systemic effects for long-term exposure can be derived starting with the NOAEL from the one-generation study (1000 mg/kg bw/d). Since no information on the dermal absorption of Keroflux ES 3241 is available worst-case assumption of 100% penetration is made for oral to dermal extrapolation. No adverse effects have been observed with regard to systemic toxicity, reproductive toxicity and developmental toxicity. Thus, default factors for allometric scaling, intraspecies variation and time extrapolation are chosen:
allometric scaling: 4
intraspecies variation: 5
time extrapolation (subchronic to chronic): 2
The overall assessment factor of 40 applied to the NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw/d results in a DNEL (dermal) for worker of 250 mg/kg bw/d.
Derivation of a inhalation DNEL - systemic effects as well as local effects for long-term exposure is considered not appropriate because of the physicochemical properties and the use of Keroflux ES 3241.
Operational conditions and risk management measure installed to minimize risk after a single dermal exposure are considered sufficient to prevent for local effect after long-term exposure.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information
Local effects
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 125 mg/kg bw/day
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 125 mg/kg bw/day
Acute/short term exposure
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Additional information - General Population
No systemic effects have been observed in rodent studies after short-term and long-term exposure to Keroflux ES 3241. The LD50 for acute oral and acute dermal exposure is >2000 mg/kg bw and based on the physical chemical properties and the use of Keroflux ES 3241 an inhalation exposure is unlikely. Thus, derivation of a DNEL for acute / short-term exposure for all three relevant routes of exposure is not appropriate according to Chapter R8 of the ECHA guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment (2008).
Keroflux ES 3241 has been tested postive for skin sensitization in a guinea-pig maximization test. Because of the single induction dose regime employed the maximization test does not allow to derive a starting point for DNEL derivation. Based on the potency considerations in chapter R8 of the ECHA guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment (2008) Keroflux ES 3241 can be considered rather a moderate skin sensitizer by taking into account the concentration for intradermal induction (> 1%) as well as the incidence of sensitization (> 60%). Data availabe do not allow for a DNEL derivation, however use and final concentration of Keroflux ES 3241 in fuel as well as risk managment measure installed already at the gas stations are considered sufficient to minimize risk for local effects after short-term exposure to Keroflux ES 3241.
DNEL - systemic effects for long-term exposure can be derived starting with the NOAEL from the one-generation study (1000 mg/kg bw/d). Since no information on the dermal absorption of Keroflux ES 3241 is available worst-case assumption of 100% penetration is made for oral to dermal extrapolation. No adverse effects have been observed with regard to systemic toxicity, reproductive toxicity and developmental toxicity. Thus, default factors for allometric scaling, intraspecies variation and time extrapolation are chosen:
allometric scaling: 4
intraspecies variation: 10
time extrapolation (subchronic to chronic): 2
The overall assessment factor of 80 applied to the NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw/d results in a DNEL (oral and dermal) for the general population of 125 mg/kg bw/d.
Derivation of a inhalation DNEL - systemic effects as well as local effects for long-term exposure is considered not appropriate because of the physicochemical properties and the use of Keroflux ES 3241.
Operational conditions and risk management measure installed to minimize risk after a single dermal exposure are considered sufficient to prevent for local effect after long-term exposure.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.