Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 406-640-0 | CAS number: 136920-07-5 KEROFLUX ES 3241
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP and guideline study
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 996
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline 415 (One-Generation Reproduction Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- A mixture of: 2,2',2'',2'''-(ethylenedinitrilotetrakis-N,N-di(C16)alkylacetamide; 2,2',2'',2'''-(ethylenedinitrilotetrakis-N,N-di(C18)alkylacetamide
- EC Number:
- 406-640-0
- EC Name:
- A mixture of: 2,2',2'',2'''-(ethylenedinitrilotetrakis-N,N-di(C16)alkylacetamide; 2,2',2'',2'''-(ethylenedinitrilotetrakis-N,N-di(C18)alkylacetamide
- Cas Number:
- 136920-07-5
- Molecular formula:
- C58H114N4O6 - C154H308N6O4
- IUPAC Name:
- Reaction mass of 2,2',2'',2'''-(ethylenedinitrilotetrakis-N,N-di(C12-C18)alkylacetamide and {[2-(Carboxymethyl-di(C12-C18)alkylcarbamoylmethyl-amino)-ethyl]-di(C12-C18)alkylcarbamoylmethyl-amino}-acetic acid
- Reference substance name:
- Keroflux ES 3241
- IUPAC Name:
- Keroflux ES 3241
- Details on test material:
- Batch No.: (T 75492/ST 1414/90) Partie 1
Manufacturing/Sampling Date: 10.10.1990
Physical state: pale yellow wax at room temperature
Storage conditions: refrigerator
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Male and female Wistar rats supplied by Karl THOMAE, Biberach an der Riss, D, which were free from any clinical signs of disease, were used for the investigations. The 112 male and 112 female rats were 25 (± 1) days old when they arrived from the breeding facilities. During an acclimatization period of 10 days, animals with lowest and highest body weights were eliminated, used for other purposes and finally sacrificed. The 100 male and 100 female animals required for the study were 35 (± 1) days old at the beginning of treatment, and their mean weights and weight ranges were: male animals: 140.0 (129.9 - 152.0) g and female animals: 114.5 (104.0 - 124.5) g.
The females were nulliparous and non-pregnant at the beginning of the study. According to a written statement from the breeder, male and female animals were derived from different litters. This was necessary to rule out the possibility of sibling mating. These animals were taken to form the F0 parental generation. All other animals used in this study (F1 pups) were derived from these animals.
The rats of the parental generation (F0 generation) were identified uniquely by ear tattoo. The unit digit of the animal number was tattooed on the outside of a rat's left ear, the ten digit on the inside of the left ear and the hundred digit was tattooed on the inside of the right ear. All live pups were identified by skin tattoo on day 1 post partum (p.p.) and with picric acid between days 10 and 15 after birth.
During the study period, the rats were housed individually in type DK III stainless steel wire mesh cages supplied by BECKER & CO., Castrop-Rauxel, FRG (floor area of about 800 cm2), with the following exceptions: during mating periods, the males designated for mating were kept individually in Makrolon cages, type M III (floor area of about 800 cm2); for the overnight mating the females were put into the cages of the males. From day 18 of gestation until day 14 after birth, the pregnant animals and their litters were also housed in Makrolon type M III cages. The M III cages were again supplied by BECKER & CO. Pregnant females were provided with nesting material (cellulose wadding) toward the end of gestation. The cages with the test animals were arranged on the racks in such a way that uniform experimental conditions (ventilation and light) were ensured.
The animals were accommodated in fully air-conditioned rooms (floor area about 22 m2) in which central air conditioning guaranteed a range of temperature of 20 - 24°C and a range of relative humidity of 30 - 70%. There were no or only minimal deviations from these limits.
The day/night rhythm was 12 hours (12 hours light from 6.00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m. and 12 hours darkness from 6.00 p.m. to 6.00 a.m.) in general.
Before use each room was completely disinfected using a disinfector. Usually, each week the walls and the floor were cleaned with water containing about 0.5% Mikro-Quat.
The food used was ground Kliba maintenance diet rat/mouse/hamster, 343 meal, supplied by KLINGENTALMUEHLE AG, Kaiseraugst, CH, which was available to the animals ad libitum throughout the study (from the day of supply to the day of or the day before necropsy). Drinking water was supplied from water bottles. The bedding used throughout the study was Ssniff (type 3/4) supplied by SSNIFF SPEZIALDIAETEN GmbH, Soest, D).
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- olive oil
- Details on exposure:
- Before the beginning of the study the test substance was melted at temperatures up to about 80°C, thoroughly mixed and bottled in small portions determined for separate use for each day of dosing. Each day before dosing the test substance was heated to about 80°C, intensively shaken and thereafter, the amounts necessary for each dose group were weighed and topped up with olive oil DAB 10 (heated to about 80°C). These test substance preparations were then stirred continuously in a water bath of about 60°C until the preparations turned into clear solutions. Finally, the test substance preparations were cooled down in a water bath of about 33°C (under continuous stirring). The stability of the test substance preparations for a period of 4 hours at room temperature was proven in a previous study (Project No. 34S0763/90086) as was the homogeneous distribution within the test substance preparations. Samples of each concentration were drawn for concentration control analyses at the start of the administration period, thereafter at intervals of about 4 weeks and at study termination.
- Details on mating procedure:
- At least 70 days after the beginning of treatment, males and females from the same dose group were mated at a ratio of 1:1 for a maximum of 3 weeks. Generally, throughout the mating period, each male animal was mated with a predetermined female animal from the same dose group. Mating occurred by placing the female in the cage of a male from 4.00 p.m. until 7.00 - 9.00 a.m. the following morning. Deviations from the specified times were possible on weekends and public holidays and were reported in the raw data.
A vaginal smear was prepared after each mating and examined for sperm. If sperm was detected, pairing of the animals was discontinued. The day on which sperm were detected was denoted "day 0" and the following day "day 1" P.C. (post coitum). - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The study was terminated with the terminal sacrifice of the F1 weanlings and F0 adult animals. Dams were treated during the complete gestation period.
- Frequency of treatment:
- continuously throughout the whole study period .
- Duration of test:
- The study was terminated with the terminal sacrifice of the F1 weanlings and F0 adult animals.
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
100; 300 or 1,000 mg/kg body weight/day
Basis:
actual ingested
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 25
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- The doses were chosen on the basis of a previous oral toxicity study, in which Wistar rats received the test substance by gavage over 4 weeks (21 administrations). In this study KEROFLUX ES 3241 was administered to each 5 male and 5 female Wistar rats per dose at doses of 15, 150 and 1000 mg/kg body weight/day. There were no substance-related effects on food consumption, body weight, body weight change, clinical observations, hematological and clinicochemical examinations and concerning pathology (absolute and relative organ weights, gross and histopathological findings) in any of the test groups. Thus, the "no observed adverse effect level" (NOAEL) was at least 1.000 mg/kg body weight/day.
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- Food consumption: During the first 10 test weeks, food consumption of the F0 rats was determined once a week (each time for a period of 7 days). After the 10th test week, food consumption of the females during gestation (animals with evidence of sperm) was determined for days 0 - 7, 7 - 14 and 14 - 20 p.c. During the lactation period (animals with litter) food consumption was determined for days 1 - 4, 4 - 7 and 7 - 14 p.p. Food consumption was not determined between days 14 and 21 after parturition as required in the test guidelines, since during this time pups begin to consume considerable amounts of solid food offered, and therefore there was no point in such a measurement. Food consumption of the F0 males was not determined after the 10th test week through sacrifice. Furthermore, there was no determination of food consumption in the F0 females during the mating periods, in the F0 females without positive evidence of sperm during the programmed gestation phase, or in the F0 females without litters during the lactation phase. The food consumption of those animals whose fertility had to be re-evaluated and those controls which were chosen as partners for these re-evaluations was not determined, neither during the additional matings nor until sacrifice.
Body weight data: In general, the body weight of the male and female parental animals was determined once a week at the same time of the day (in the morning); if possible, the weighings were carried out until the end of the study. The body weight change of the animals was calculated from these results.
Clinical observations: All parental animals were checked for clinically evident signs of toxicity shortly before and after the daily intubation; in case of findings, these were documented. For technical reasons, however, the clinical observations recorded during the premating periods were printed out on a weekly basis. The nesting, littering, and lactation behaviour of the dams was generally evaluated in the mornings in connection with the daily clinical inspection of the dams. Only special findings (e.g., animal could not litter, umbilical cord not cut), were documented on an individual dam basis. The littering behaviour of the dams was also inspected on weekdays (except holidays) in the afternoons in addition to the evaluations in the mornings. The day of littering was considered the 24 hour period from about 3.00 p.m. of one day until about 3.00 p.m. of the following day. Deviations from this procedure were possible on Saturdays, Sundays and on public holidays, when the weighings of the dams took place as early as about 7.00 a.m.. Animals in a moribund state were sacrificed and examined in the laboratory of pathology. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- Female reproduction and delivery data: The mating partners, the number of mating days until vaginal sperm could be detected, and gestational status were recorded for F0 females.
The uteri of the females re-evaluated for fertility were examined at the reproduction toxicology laboratory for live and dead implantations. In the case of an apparently non-pregnant animal or of an empty uterus horn in the case of single-horn pregnancy, the uterus was stained with sodium sulfide and assessed for early implantations according to the method of SALEWSKI. Then the uteri were rinsed carefully under running water. After these examinations were completed, the uteri were transferred to the pathology lab for further fixation and evaluation. - Fetal examinations:
- Pup number and status at delivery: All pups derived from the F0 parents (F1 litter) were examined as soon as possible on the day of birth to determine the total number of pups and the number of liveborn and stillborn members of each litter. Pups which died before the first determination of their status on the day of birth were designated as stillborn pups.
Pup viability/mortality: In general, a check was made for any dead or moribund pups twice daily on workdays (once in the morning and once in the afternoon) or as a rule, only in the morning on Saturdays, Sundays or public holidays. The number and percentage of dead pups on the day of birth (day 0) and of pups dying between days 1-4, 5-7, 8-14 and 15-21 of the lactation period were determined; however, pups which died accidentally or had to be sacrificed due to maternal death were not included in these calculations. The number of live pups/litter was calculated on the day of birth, and on lactation days 4, 7, 14 and 21.
Sex ratio: On the day of birth (day 0) the sex of the pups was determined by observing the distance between the anus and the base of the genital tubercle; normally, the anogenital distance is considerably greater in male than in female pups. Subsequently the sex of the pups was assessed by the external appearance of the anogenital region and/or the mammary line of the animals and was finally confirmed at necropsy.
Pup body weight data: The pups were weighed on the day after birth (day 1 p.p.).
Pup necropsy observations: All pups with scheduled sacrifice (i.e. pups which were culled on day 4 p.p. and pups which were sacrificed on day 21 after birth or subsequent days) were killed by means of CO2. These pups were examined externally and eviscerated, their organs were assessed macroscopically. If there were notable findings or if abnormalities were found in the daily clinical observation of the animals after their delivery, the affected animals were, if it was deemed necessary, examined additionally using appropriate methods (e.g., skeletal staining according to modified DAWSON's method (Dawson, A.B., 1926)) and/or further processing of head according to WILSON's method. All stillborn pups and all pups that died up to weaning were examined externally, eviscerated, and their organs assessed macroscopically. If there were notable findings or if abnormalities were found in the daily clinical observation of the animals after their delivery, the affected animals were, if it was deemed necessary, examined additionally using appropriate methods (e.g., skeletal staining according to modified DAWSON's method and/or further processing of head according to WILSON's method. The stained skeletons were evaluated under a stereomicroscope or a magnifying glass. All pups without any notable findings or abnormalities were discarded after their macroscopic evaluation. - Statistics:
- Statistics of the clinical examinations, statistics of clinical pathology, statistics of pathology
- Indices:
- Gestation index (%), live birth index (%), viability index (%), lactation index (%), sex ratio
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
no adverse effects observed; for details see study results described in IUCLID chapter 7.5.1
Effect levels (maternal animals)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Basis for effect level:
- other: developmental toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
Results (fetuses)
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
Pup number and status of delivery
The mean numnber of delivered Fl pups/dam and the rate of liveborn and stillborn F1 pups were not influenced by the administration of the test substance. The observable differences are without any biological relevance; all values are fully within the historical control range.
Pup viability/ mortality
The number of F1 pups which died during the entire lactation period was similar in all groups and did not show any dose-response relationship. Consequently, viability and lactation indices were substantially similar between the treatment groups and the control group; the corresponding values are fully within the historical control range for rats of this strain. Thus, pup viability/mortality was not influenced by the oral administration of Keroflux ES 3241 to the lactating F0 dams.
Pup body weight data
Mean body weights and body weight gains of F1 pups were not adversely affected. Sporadically, statistically significantly increased pup body vieights/body weight gains occurred in the 300 and 1,000 mg/kg body weight/day treatment groups; however, as mean pup body weights on day 21 p.p. and pup weight gains (days 4 - 21 p.p.> were quite similar between the control and the pups of the substance treated groups (max. deviation 6%>, these differences are considered to be spontaneous in nature.
Pup clinical observations
The F1 generation pups did not show any clinical signs up to weaning which could be attributed to treatment. Kinky tail was recorded for one control pup and two pups of low dose test group. Moreover, one pup of the 100 mg/kg group showed bilateral anophthalmia and hydrocephaly. All of these findings, for which no dose-response relationship exists occur also occasionally in control pups of the rat strain used.
Development stages
There were no biologically relevant differences between the control and the substance-treated F1 pups in the several morphological development stages monitored up to weaning.
Pup necropsy observations
Pup necropsy findings (e.g. incisors sloped, anophthalmia, hernia diaphragmatica, dilated renal pelvis, agenesia of kidney(s), ureter(s), uterine horn (s), hydrocephaly and kinky tail) appeared only in very few of the pups examined. One stillborn high dose pup showed multiple malformations of the head when it was exainined externally. After skeletal staining it became obvious, that only some of the skull bones were present and partly fused, however, the severity of findings, a detailed specification was impossible.
The isolated nature of the pup necropsy observations does not suggest any relationship to treatment.
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
Viability indices | ||||
Treatment (mg/kg bw/d) | 0 (control) | 100 | 300 | 1000 |
Viability index (%) | 97 | 95 | 95 | 96 |
Lactation index (%) | 98 | 99 | 99 | 99 |
Sex ratio: males (%; d0) | 52 | 53 | 52 | 51 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.