Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1994
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
Read-across study
Justification for type of information:
This study for the source substance SMCT is used as read-across to the registered (target) substance SMLT. Refer to section 13 for read-across justification.
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across: supporting information

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1994
Report date:
1994

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
Buehler test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Historically available non-LLNA test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Fatty acid chlorides, C12-18 (even numbered) and C18 unsatd., reaction products with sodium N-methyltaurinate
EC Number:
939-529-5
Molecular formula:
not applicable, substance is a UVCB substance containing several constituents
IUPAC Name:
Fatty acid chlorides, C12-18 (even numbered) and C18 unsatd., reaction products with sodium N-methyltaurinate
Test material form:
semi-solid (amorphous): gel
Remarks:
migrated information: paste

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
other: Pirbright-White
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Hoechst AG. SPF breeding (Hoe:DHPK[SPFLac])
- Weight at study initiation: 299g (264 - 327 g)
- Housing: Macrolon cages (type 4)
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 +/- 3°C
- Humidity (%): 50 +/- 20 %
- Air changes (per hr): 12 - 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
Topical induction: 100 %
Topical challenge: 20%
Challenge
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
water
Concentration / amount:
Topical induction: 100 %
Topical challenge: 20%
No. of animals per dose:
20 for test group
10 for control group
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS: yes, determination of primary irritating and non-irritating concentration

Challenge controls:
yes, negative control group
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
alpha-hexylcinnamaldehyde

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
Sensitivity of test system periodically confirmed using alpha-hexylcinnamaldehyde as positive control.

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
20%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 20%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: none.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
20%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 20%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: none.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
20%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 20%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: none.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
20%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 20%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: none.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
data not available
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
0
Clinical observations:
data not available
Remarks on result:
other: data not available
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
data not available
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
0
Clinical observations:
data not available
Remarks on result:
other: data not available

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Based on the study results, the read-across source substance sodium methyl cocoyl taurate (SMCT) is not a skin sensitizer in the Buehler test.

This study for the source substance SMCT is used as read-across to the registered (target) substance SMLT. Hence, SMLT is not expected to be a skin sensitiser.
Executive summary:

The skin sensitization potential of the read-across source substance sodium methyl cocoyl taurate (SMCT) was evaluated for potential skin sensitizing effects in guinea pigs according to OECD Guideline 406 using the methodology of Buehler. Dermal induction was performed using 100% test material. The control group was exposed to the vehicle water only. Challenge treatment was carried out using a 20% test material in water as vehicle. Under the conditions of the present study, none of the 20 animals of the treatment group showed a positive skin response after the challenge procedure (sensitization incidence = 0%). Also none of the 10 control animals exhibited skin responses. Based on the results of this study, SMCT is not a skin sensitizer.

This study for the source substance SMCT is used as read-across to the registered (target) substance SMLT. Hence, SMLT is not expected to be a skin sensitiser.