Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1980
Report date:
1980

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Based on the proposed guideline of the USEPA § 163.81-4
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The test substance was administered to an eye of (3 male and 3 female) New Zealand White rabbits. The animals were followed for 7 days after exposure and were scored on corneal opacity, iritis, conjunctival redness and chemosis.
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
m,m'-[(9,10-dihydro-9,10-dioxo-1,4-anthrylene)diimino]bis[2,4,6-trimethylbenzenesulphonic] acid, compound with hexane-1,6-diamine (1:1)
EC Number:
279-213-8
EC Name:
m,m'-[(9,10-dihydro-9,10-dioxo-1,4-anthrylene)diimino]bis[2,4,6-trimethylbenzenesulphonic] acid, compound with hexane-1,6-diamine (1:1)
Cas Number:
79665-26-2
Molecular formula:
C32 H30 N2 O8 S2 . C6 H16 N2
IUPAC Name:
m,m'-[(9,10-dihydro-9,10-dioxo-1,4-anthrylene)diimino]bis[2,4,6-trimethylbenzenesulphonic] acid, compound with hexane-1,6-diamine (1:1)
Test material form:
solid

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: adult
- Weight at study initiation: 2-3 kg
- Housing: individually in metal cages
- Diet: standard rabbit food - NAFAG, No. 814, Gossau SG; ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: minimal 4 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 2
- Humidity (%): 55 ± 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 14/10

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
0.1 g
Observation period (in vivo):
7 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 males and 3 females
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: yes in 3 of the 6 rabbits, with 10 mL of physiological saline
- Time after start of exposure: 30 seconds

SCORING SYSTEM: Readings were performed on day 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 after application. Effects on cornea, iris, and conjunctivae were scored. For evaluation, the calculation of the mean values of corneal opacity, iris, conjunctival redness and chemosis for readings 24, 48 and 72 hours were quoted. Additionally, the reversibility of the observed findings was taken into account.

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: slit-lamp

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: non-washed
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Remarks on result:
other: non-washed
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Remarks on result:
other: non-washed
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: non-washed
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Eyes that were washed 30 seconds after exposure, also showed no irritant effects.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met