Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Effects on fertility

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
one-generation reproductive toxicity
Remarks:
based on test type (migrated information)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Data is from peer reviewed journal
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: as mentioned below
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Developmental Toxicity Study of Quaternary Silsesquioxane in rats
GLP compliance:
not specified
Limit test:
no
Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Details on test animals and env. conditions
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Inc. (Portage, MI).
- Age at study initiation: 13 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 206 to 275 g at gestation day 0
- Fasting period before study: No data available
- Housing: Animal were housed individually, except during mating, in suspended stainless steel wire mesh cages from receipt until sacrifice.
- Use of restrainers for preventing ingestion (if dermal): No data available
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): basal laboratory diet of Certified Rodent Chow 5002 (Ralston Purina Co., St. Louis, MO), ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 12 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17 -20°C
- Humidity (%):Relative humidity: 30-70%
- Air changes (per hr): No data available
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hrs

IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: No data available
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
not specified
Vehicle:
corn oil
Details on exposure:
Details on oral exposure
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: Quat-Silsesquioxane was suspended fresh daily in corn oil

DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): No data available
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): No data available
- Storage temperature of food: No data available

VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): corn oil.
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 100, 300, and 1000 mg/kg/day
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 10 ml/kg.
- Lot/batch no. (if required): No data available
- Purity: No data available
Details on mating procedure:
- M/F ratio per cage:1:1
- Length of cohabitation:No data available
- Proof of pregnancy: [vaginal plug / sperm in vaginal smear] referred to as [day 0 / day 1] of pregnancy:Copulatory plug referred to as 0 of pregnancy
- After ... days of unsuccessful pairing replacement of first male by another male with proven fertility.:No data available
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: No data available
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged (how):stainless steel wire mesh cages: Individually
- Any other deviations from standard protocol:No data available
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
not specified
Duration of treatment / exposure:
10 days
Frequency of treatment:
Daily from gestation days 6 to 15
Details on study schedule:
No data available
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day
Basis:
other: Dosage levels were selected from the results obtained in a range-finding developmental toxicity study
No. of animals per sex per dose:
25 rats per doses
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale: Dosage levels were selected from the results obtained in a range-finding developmental toxicity study. In that study neither maternalnor developmental toxicity was seen at dosage levels of up to 1000 mg/kg/day.
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): Mated females were assigned consecutively, in the order the mating was detected
- Rationale for selecting satellite groups: No data available
- Post-exposure recovery period in satellite groups:No data available
- Section schedule rationale (if not random):No data available
Positive control:
No data available
Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily
- Cage side observations checked in table [No.?] were included. For changes in appearance, behavior and mortality.

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: daily on Gestation Days 0,6,9, 12, 16, and 20.

FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):Yes
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes
- Compound intake calculated as time weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data available

FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Body weight gain in kg/food consumption in kg per unit time X 100 calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data available

WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No data available
- Time schedule for examinations: No data available

other:
organ weight: liver and gravid uterine weight was recorded
Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
Nongravid Uteri were examined for Corpora lutea, Total implantation and Postimplantation loss.
Sperm parameters (parental animals):
No data available
Litter observations:
viable fetuses, crown-rump length, fetal body weight and sex ratio were examined.
Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
SACRIFICE
- Male animals: No data available
- Maternal animals: Yes, gross pathology were examined.
Postmortem examinations (offspring):
Postmortem examinations (offspring)
SACRIFICE: Yes

GROSS NECROPSY: Yes

HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
One-half of the fetuses were examined for soft tissue and remaining half for subsequent skeletal examination.

Statistics:
1)Mean maternal body weights and liver weights, maternal feed consumption, numbers of corpora lutea, total implantations, live fetuses, gravid uterine weight, and mean fetal body weights were compared by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Bartlett's test for homogeneity of variance, and the appropriate test for equal and unequal variance (Steel and Torrie, 1960) using Dunnett's multiple comparison.
2) The proportions of resorbed and dead fetuses and postimplantation losses were compared by the Mann-Whitney t/test.
3) Male to female fetal sex ratios and the proportions of litters with malformations and developmental variations were compared using the x1 test criterion with Yate's correction for 2 X 2 contingency tables and/or
Fisher's exact probability test.
Reproductive indices:
Fertility and gestation were examined.
Offspring viability indices:
yes, viable fetuses were examined.
Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
no effects observed
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
effects observed, treatment-related
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
not specified
Other effects:
not specified
Description (incidence and severity):
Test substance intake: No data available
Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
no effects observed
Reproductive function: sperm measures:
not specified
Reproductive performance:
no effects observed
Mortality – No effect on survival of treated female rats were observed as compared to contorl.

Clinical signs- No clinical signs or behavioral changes were observed in treated female rats as compared to control.

Body weights – No body weight changes were observed in treated femlae rats as compared to contorl.

Feed consumption - No feed consumption changes were observed in treated female rats as compared to control.

Reproductive funtion: estrous cycle:
No adverse effects on mean number of corpora lutea, number of live fetuses per litter, litter size, mean fetal body weight, or mean crown-rump length.

Reproductive performance:
Ratio of male and female pups at the 1000 mg/ kg/day dose level was significantly different from the control group but was not considered treatment related.

Organ weight - Slight but significant increase in relative liver weight of treated female rats was observed as compared to control.
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
300 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
female
Basis for effect level:
other: No effect on survival, Clinical signs, Body weight, Organ weight and reproductive performance
Clinical signs:
not specified
Mortality / viability:
no mortality observed
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Sexual maturation:
not specified
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
not specified
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings:
no effects observed
Viability: No effect on viability of fetuses were observed as compated to control.

Body weight: No significant effect were observed on fetal body weight as compared to control.

Gross pathology :No significant external malformations were observed in treated fetuses as compared to control.

Histopathology :
When treated with 1000 mg/kg bw, One fetus with bent limb bones, Two fetuses from different mothers with microphthalmia and two other fetuses with omphalocele were observed in treated fetuses as compared to control.

When treated with 300 mg/kg bw, single fetus with multiple malformations were observed in treated fetuses as compared to control.
The incidence of developmental variations in the treated litters was not significantly increased over the control incidence. They occurred in low frequency and were distributed randomly across the Quat-Silsesquioxane treated and control groups.
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Generation:
F1
Effect level:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: No effect on Viability , body weight, gross pathology and histopathology
Reproductive effects observed:
not specified

TABLE 1

Summary of Maternal Body Weight Gain, Food Consumption, and Liver Weights

 

Dose levels (mg/kg/day)

Gestation day

0

100

300

1000

 

Mean body weight change (g)

0-6

26 ± 7a

25 ±7

27 ±7

29 ±8

6-9

3 ± 8

3 ± 8

7±7

6 ± 8

9-12

16 ± 10

19 ±6

15 ± 4

15 ± 9

12-16

27 + 7

26 ± 12

22 ± 8

22 ± 11

16-20

59 ± 11

61 ± 17

62 ± 13

60 ± 15

0-20

131 ± 19

133 ±25

132 ± 19

132 ±25

0-20 adjustedb

61 + 13

62 ± 14

62+13

66 ± 13

Mean food consumption (g/dam/day)

0-6

21.5 + 2

21.5 ±2

22.3 ±2

22.0 ± 4

6-9

17.8 ± 4

15.2 ±3*

17.9 ± 3

19.9 ± 8

9-12

17.9 ± 2

17.9 ± 2

19.9 ±3*

21.2 ±8

12-16

19.8 ± 2

21.1 ±5

20.4 ± 3

20.2 ±4

16-20

27.3 ± 2

27.4 ±3

26.2 ±6

28.0 ±2

0-20

21.3+1

21.2 ± 2

21.7 ± 2

22.5 ± 3

Mean maternal liver weight(20 days of gestation)

Absolute (g)

15.4 + 2.9

15.3 ±2.9

16.1 ±2.6

16.5 ±2.5

Relative (%)

4.4 ± 0.4

4.4 ± 0.3

4.5 ±0.3

4.6 ± 0.2*

aMean ± SD.

bDam body weight minus the uterus and its contents.

* Significantly different from controls; ANOVA, Welch Test, P < 0.05            

          

TABLE 2

Summary of Observations at Time of Cesarean Sections

 

Dose levels (mg/kg/day)

 

0

100

300

1000

Animals examined at cesarean sections

25

25

25

25

Nongravid

7

7

5

4

Gravid

18

18

20

21

Dams with resorptions only

0

0

0

0

Dams with viable fetuses

18

18

20

21

Viable fetuses/dama

13.3 ±2.7

13.3 ± 3.3

13.2 ± 4.2

12.4 ± 4.0

Postimplantation loss/dama

1.1 ±0.8

0.6 ± 0.61

1 5 ± 2.31

0.8 + 0.8

Total implantation/dama

14.4 ±2.5

13.9 ± 3.5

14.7 ± 3.4

13.2 ± 4.4

Corpora lutea/dama

17.8 ±3.3

15.8 ± 2.6

17.7 ± 2.9

16.2 ± 3.2

Mean crown-rump length (cm)

3.5 ±0.1

3.5 ± 0.2

3.5 ± 0 1

3.5 ± 0 1

Group mean uterine weights (g)

70.1 ±14.1

71.3 ±17.7

70.3 ±21.2

66.5 ± 18.2

Group mean preimplantation loss (%)

18.8

12.0

17.2

18.2

Group mean postimplantation loss (%)

7.7

4.4

9.9

6.1

Mean fetal body weight (g)

3.4 ±0.2

3.5 ± 0.5

3.4 ± 0.2

3.4 + 0.3

Fetal sex ratio—m:f (%)

44:56

49:51

50:50

55:45*

aMean ± SD.

* Significantly different; x2. P * 0.05.

TABLE 3

Summary of the Incidence of Fetal Malformations*

 

Dose levels (mg/kg/day)

 

No. examined

Litters

18

18

20

21

Fetuses externally

240

238

263

260

Fetuses viscerally

119

118

132

129

Fetuses skeletally

121

121

132

132

 

No.of fetuses (No. Of litters) affected

Malformations observed

 

 

 

 

Anophthalmia

1 (1)

 

 

 

Microphthalmia

 

 

 

2(2)

Gastroschisis

 

 

1(1)

 

Omphalocele

 

 

 

2(2)

Tail agenesis

 

 

1(1)

 

Tarsal flexure

 

 

1(1)

 

Edema

 

 

1(1)

 

Malformed skull bones

 

 

1(1)

 

Bent clavicle

 

 

1(1)

 

Bent scapula

 

 

1(1)

 

Amelia

 

 

1(1)

 

Micromelia

 

 

1(1)

 

Bent limb bones

1(1)

 

 

1(1)

Vertebral agenesis

 

 

1(1)

 

Pelvic malformation

 

 

1(1)

 

Total fetuses (litters) with malformations

2(2)

0(0)

1(1)

5(4)

* No statistical significance was observed.

TABLE 4

Summary of the Incidence of Fetal Variations*

 

Summary of the Incidence of Fetal Variations*

 

Dose levels (mg/kg/day)

 

0

100

300

1000

 

No. examined

Litters

18

18

20

21

Fetuses externally

240

238

263

260

Fetuses viscerally

119

118

132

129

Fetuses skeletally

121

121

132

132

 

No.of fetuses (No. Of litters) affected

Developmental variations observed

 

 

 

 

Renal papillae not developed

 

1(1)

1(1)

 

Distended ureter

 

1(1)

1(1)

 

Skull reduced in ossification

2(1)

3(2)

2(2)

 

Hyoid unossified

1(1)

 

1(1)

1(1)

25 presacral vertebrae

 

 

1(1)

2(2)

Greater than 13 pairs of full ribs

 

 

2(2)

 

14th rudimentary rib(s)

6(3)

7(4)

12(5)

6(5)

Bent ribs

 

1(1)

 

2(1)

7th cervical rib

3(3)

 

2(2)

 

Vertebrae reduced in ossification

1(1)

 

1(1)

 

Misaligned sternebra(e)

8(6)

6(5)

8(6)

4(3)

Sternebra 5 and/or 6 unossified

3(5)

7(6)

4(4)

8(6)

Other sternebra(e) unossified

1(1)

 

1(1)

1(1)

Ischia reduced in ossification

1(1)

 

 

2(1)

Total fetuses (litters) with developmental variations

22(12)

24(11)

30(14)

22(12)

* No statistical significance was observed.
Conclusions:
NOAEL was considered to be 300 mg/kg bw for P generation and 1000 mg/kg for F1 generation when Sprague-Dawleyd female rats were treated with Quat-Silsesquioxane orally by gavage from day 6 to 15 of gestation.
Executive summary:

In a developmental toxicity study, Sprague-Dawley female rats were treated with Quat-Silsesquioxane in the concentration of 0, 100, 300, or 1000 mg/kg/day orally by gavage in corn oil.No maternal mortality and clinical signs or behavioral changes were observed in treated female rats as compared to control. No effect on body weight and feed consumption changes were observed in treated female rats as compared to control. Similarly, no effect on reproductive parameters such as number of corpora lutea, number of live fetuses per litter, litter size, mean fetal body weight, or mean crown-rump length was observed in treated rats. Ratio of male and female pups at the 1000 mg/ kg/day dose level was significantly different from the control group but was not considered treatment related. Slight but significant increase in relative liver weight of treated female rats was observed as compared to control. In addition, No effect on viability, fetal body weight and external malformations were observed in treated fetuses as compared to control. One fetus with bent limb bones, two fetuses from different mothers with microphthalmia and two other fetuses with omphalocele were observed at 1000 mg/kg/day and single fetus with multiple malformations were observed at 300 mg/kg/day in treated fetuses as compared to control. The incidence of developmental variations in the treated litters was not significantly increased over the control incidence. They occurred in low frequency and were distributed randomly across the Quat-Silsesquioxane treated and control groups. Therefore,NOAEL was considered to be 300 mg/kg bw for P generation and 1000 mg/kg for F1 generation when Sprague-Dawley female rats were treated with Quat-Silsesquioxane orally by gavage from day 6 to 15 of gestation.

Effect on fertility: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
300 mg/kg bw/day
Study duration:
subacute
Species:
rat
Quality of whole database:
Data is Klimisch 2 and from peer-reviewed journal
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Additional information

Reproductive toxicity:

Data available for target 1-Octadecanaminium- N,N-dimethyl-N-{3- (trimethoxysilyl)propyl}- chloride (CAS no 27668-52-6) for reproductive toxicity are summarized as below 

In a study conducted by Siddiquiet al(1993),reproductive toxicity was evaluated in Sprague-Dawley female rats by using Quat-Silsesquioxane in the concentration of 0, 100, 300, or 1000 mg/kg/day orally by gavage in corn oil.No maternal mortality and clinical signs or behavioral changes were observed in treated female rats as compared to control. No effect on body weight and feed consumption changes were observed in treated female rats as compared to control. Similarly, no effect on reproductive parameters such as number of corpora lutea, number of live fetuses per litter, litter size, mean fetal body weight, or mean crown-rump length was observed in treated rats. Ratio of male and female pups at the 1000 mg/ kg/day dose level was significantly different from the control group but was not considered treatment related. Slight but significant increase in relative liver weight of treated female rats was observed as compared to control. In addition, No effect on viability, fetal body weight and external malformations were observed in treated fetuses as compared to control. One fetus with bent limb bones, two fetuses from different mothers with microphthalmia and two other fetuses with omphalocele were observed at 1000 mg/kg/day and single fetus with multiple malformations were observed at 300 mg/kg/day in treated fetuses as compared to control. The incidence of developmental variations in the treated litters was not significantly increased over the control incidence. They occurred in low frequency and were distributed randomly across the Quat-Silsesquioxane treated and control groups. Therefore,NOAEL was considered to be 300 mg/kg bw for P generation and 1000 mg/kg for F1 generation when Sprague-Dawley female rats were treated with Quat-Silsesquioxane orally by gavage from day 6 to 15 of gestation.

In a study conducted byDupont Chem Co (1992),teratogenicity was evaluated in Albinofemale rats by using Dow Corninc @Q9-5700 in the concentration of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg orally. 1 nongravid rats died at 1000 mg/kg and 1 pregnant rats died at 100 mg/kg as compared to control. No untoward behavioral reactions were observed in treated female rats as compared to control.Similarly,Noeffect on gestation andgross pathological changes were observed in treated female rat as compared to control. In addition, No effect on fetuses Body weight were observed as compared to control. No external abnormalities and skeletal and internal developmental effect were observed in treated fetuses as compared to control. Therefore, NOAEL was considered to be 1000 mg/kg for P and F1 generation when  Albinofemale rats were treated with Dow Corninc @Q9-5700 orally from gestation days 6 through 15.

Thus, based on the above available data for targetQuat-Silsesquioxane(CAS no 27668-52-6) is likely to be non hazardous as reproductive toxicant.

Short description of key information:

Quat-Silsesquioxane (CAS no 27668-52-6) is likely to be non hazardous as reproductive toxicant.

Justification for selection of Effect on fertility via oral route:

NOAEL was considered to be 300 mg/kg bw for P generation and 1000 mg/kg for F1 generation when Sprague-Dawley female rats were treated with Quat-Silsesquioxane orally by gavage from day 6 to 15 of gestation.

Effects on developmental toxicity

Description of key information

Quat-Silsesquioxane (CAS no 27668-52-6) is likely to be non hazardous as developmental toxicant.

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
developmental toxicity
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Justification for type of information:
Data is from peer reviewed journal
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: as mentioned below
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The developmental toxicity of an antimicrobial organosilicon quaternary ammonium chloride (Quaternary Silsesquioxane) was evaluated in rats.
Study was conducted according to The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
GLP compliance:
no
Limit test:
no
Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
-Sex: Female
- Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Inc. (Portage, MI).
- Age at study initiation: 13 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 206 to 275 g at gestation day 0
- Fasting period before study: No data available
- Housing: Animal were housed individually, except during mating, in suspended stainless steel wire mesh cages from receipt until sacrifice.
- Use of restrainers for preventing ingestion (if dermal): No data available
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): basal laboratory diet of Certified Rodent Chow 5002 (Ralston Purina Co., St. Louis, MO), ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 12 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17 -20°C
- Humidity (%):Relative humidity: 30-70%
- Air changes (per hr): No data available
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hrs

IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: No data available
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
not specified
Vehicle:
corn oil
Details on exposure:
Details on oral exposure
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: Quat-Silsesquioxane was suspended fresh daily in corn oil

DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): No data available
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): No data available
- Storage temperature of food: No data available

VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): corn oil.
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 100, 300, and 1000 mg/kg/day
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 10 ml/kg.
- Lot/batch no. (if required): No data available
- Purity: No data available
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
not specified
Details on mating procedure:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1:1
- Proof of pregnancy: Copulatory plug was designated Day 0 of gestation
Duration of treatment / exposure:
10 days
Frequency of treatment:
Single daily dose
Duration of test:
20 days of gestation
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
0, 100, 300, and 1000 mg/kg/day
Basis:
no data
No. of animals per sex per dose:
Total: 100
0 mg/kg/day: 25 female
100 mg/kg/day: 25 female
300 mg/kg/day: 25 female
10000 mg/kg/day: 25 female
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale: Dosage levels were selected from the results obtained in a range-finding developmental toxicity study. In that study neither maternalnor developmental toxicity was seen at dosage levels of up to 1000 mg/kg/day.
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): Mated females were assigned consecutively, in the order the mating was detected
- Rationale for selecting satellite groups: No data available
- Post-exposure recovery period in satellite groups:No data available
- Section schedule rationale (if not random):No data available
Maternal examinations:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily
- Cage side observations checked in table [No.?] were included. For changes in appearance, behavior and mortality.

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: daily on Gestation Days 0,6,9, 12, 16, and 20.

FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):Yes
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes
- Compound intake calculated as time weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data available

FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Body weight gain in kg/food consumption in kg per unit time X 100 calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data available

WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No data available
- Time schedule for examinations: No data available

other:
organ weight: liver and gravid uterine weight was recorded
Ovaries and uterine content:
Nongravid Uteri were examined for Corpora lutea, Total implantation and Postimplantation loss.
Fetal examinations:
viable fetuses, crown-rump length, fetal body weight and sex ratio, gross pathology and histopathology were examined.
Statistics:
Mean maternal body weights and liver weights, maternal feed consumption, numbers of corpora lutea, total implantations,live fetuses, gravid uterine weight, and mean fetal body weights were compared by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Bartlett's test for homogeneity of variance, and the appropriate t test for equal and unequal variance (Steel and Torrie, 1960) using Dunnett's multiple comparison(Dunnett, 1964). The proportions of resorbed and dead fetuses and postimplantation losses were compared by the Mann-Whitney t/test (Siegel,1956). Male to female fetal sex ratios and the proportions of litters with malformations and developmental variations were compared using the x1 test criterion with Yate's correction for 2 X 2 contingency tables and/or
Fisher's exact probability test (Siegel, 1956; Weil, 1970). All statistical analyses compared the mean values of the treated groups with those of the
control, with the levels of significance at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01.
Indices:
Viability, Fertility and gestation were examined
Historical control data:
No data available
Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
not specified
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
no effects observed
Food efficiency:
not specified
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not specified
Ophthalmological findings:
not specified
Haematological findings:
not specified
Clinical biochemistry findings:
not specified
Urinalysis findings:
not specified
Behaviour (functional findings):
no effects observed
Immunological findings:
not specified
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
effects observed, treatment-related
Gross pathological findings:
not specified
Neuropathological findings:
not specified
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
not specified
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
not specified
Other effects:
not specified
Details on results:
Mortality – No effect on survival of treated female rats were observed as compared to control.

Clinical signs- No clinical signs or behavioral changes were observed in treated female rats as compared to control.

Body weights – No body weight changes were observed in treated female rats as compared to control.

Feed consumption - No feed consumption changes were observed in treated female rats as compared to control.

Organ weight - Slight but significant increase in relative liver weight of treated female rats was observed as compared to control.
Number of abortions:
not specified
Pre- and post-implantation loss:
no effects observed
Total litter losses by resorption:
no effects observed
Early or late resorptions:
no effects observed
Dead fetuses:
not specified
Changes in pregnancy duration:
not specified
Description (incidence and severity):
Migrated Data from removed field(s)
Field "Effects on pregnancy duration" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsMaternalAnimals.MaternalDevelopmentalToxicity.EffectsOnPregnancyDuration): not specified
Changes in number of pregnant:
not specified
Other effects:
not specified
Details on maternal toxic effects:
Reproductive function: estrous cycle:
No adverse effects on mean number of corpora lutea, number of live fetuses per litter, litter size, mean fetal body weight, or mean crown-rump length.

Reproductive performance:
Ratio of male and female pups at the 1000 mg/ kg/day dose level was significantly different from the control group but was not considered treatment related.


Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
300 mg/kg bw/day
Based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect level:
other: maternal toxicity
Abnormalities:
not specified
Localisation:
not specified
Fetal body weight changes:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Migrated Data from removed field(s)
Field "Fetal/pup body weight changes" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsFetuses.FetalPupBodyWeightChanges): no effects observed
Reduction in number of live offspring:
no effects observed
Changes in sex ratio:
no effects observed
Changes in litter size and weights:
not specified
Changes in postnatal survival:
not specified
External malformations:
no effects observed
Skeletal malformations:
no effects observed
Visceral malformations:
not specified
Other effects:
not specified
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
No developmental parameter such as viability, fetal body weight and external malformations were observed in treated fetuses as compared to control. One fetus with bent limb bones, two fetuses from different mothers with microphthalmia and two other fetuses with omphalocele were observed at 1000 mg/kg/day and single fetus with multiple malformations were observed at 300 mg/kg/day in treated fetuses as compared to control. The incidence of developmental variations in the treated litters was not significantly increased over the control incidence.
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
changes in sex ratio
fetal/pup body weight changes
external malformations
Abnormalities:
not specified
Abnormalities:
not specified
Localisation:
other: not specified
Developmental effects observed:
not specified

TABLE 1

Summary of Maternal Body Weight Gain, Food Consumption, and Liver Weights

 

Dose levels (mg/kg/day)

Gestation day

0

100

300

1000

 

Mean body weight change (g)

0-6

26 ± 7a

25 ±7

27 ±7

29 ±8

6-9

3 ± 8

3 ± 8

7±7

6 ± 8

9-12

16 ± 10

19 ±6

15 ± 4

15 ± 9

12-16

27 + 7

26 ± 12

22 ± 8

22 ± 11

16-20

59 ± 11

61 ± 17

62 ± 13

60 ± 15

0-20

131 ± 19

133 ±25

132 ± 19

132 ±25

0-20 adjustedb

61 + 13

62 ± 14

62+13

66 ± 13

Mean food consumption (g/dam/day)

0-6

21.5 + 2

21.5 ±2

22.3 ±2

22.0 ± 4

6-9

17.8 ± 4

15.2 ±3*

17.9 ± 3

19.9 ± 8

9-12

17.9 ± 2

17.9 ± 2

19.9 ±3*

21.2 ±8

12-16

19.8 ± 2

21.1 ±5

20.4 ± 3

20.2 ±4

16-20

27.3 ± 2

27.4 ±3

26.2 ±6

28.0 ±2

0-20

21.3+1

21.2 ± 2

21.7 ± 2

22.5 ± 3

Mean maternal liver weight(20 days of gestation)

Absolute (g)

15.4 + 2.9

15.3 ±2.9

16.1 ±2.6

16.5 ±2.5

Relative (%)

4.4 ± 0.4

4.4 ± 0.3

4.5 ±0.3

4.6 ± 0.2*

aMean ± SD.

bDam body weight minus the uterus and its contents.

* Significantly different from controls; ANOVA, Welch Test, P < 0.05            

          

TABLE 2

Summary of Observations at Time of Cesarean Sections

 

Dose levels (mg/kg/day)

 

0

100

300

1000

Animals examined at cesarean sections

25

25

25

25

Nongravid

7

7

5

4

Gravid

18

18

20

21

Dams with resorptions only

0

0

0

0

Dams with viable fetuses

18

18

20

21

Viable fetuses/dama

13.3 ±2.7

13.3 ± 3.3

13.2 ± 4.2

12.4 ± 4.0

Postimplantation loss/dama

1.1 ±0.8

0.6 ± 0.61

1 5 ± 2.31

0.8 + 0.8

Total implantation/dama

14.4 ±2.5

13.9 ± 3.5

14.7 ± 3.4

13.2 ± 4.4

Corpora lutea/dama

17.8 ±3.3

15.8 ± 2.6

17.7 ± 2.9

16.2 ± 3.2

Mean crown-rump length (cm)

3.5 ±0.1

3.5 ± 0.2

3.5 ± 0 1

3.5 ± 0 1

Group mean uterine weights (g)

70.1 ±14.1

71.3 ±17.7

70.3 ±21.2

66.5 ± 18.2

Group mean preimplantation loss (%)

18.8

12.0

17.2

18.2

Group mean postimplantation loss (%)

7.7

4.4

9.9

6.1

Mean fetal body weight (g)

3.4 ±0.2

3.5 ± 0.5

3.4 ± 0.2

3.4 + 0.3

Fetal sex ratio—m:f (%)

44:56

49:51

50:50

55:45*

aMean ± SD.

* Significantly different; x2. P * 0.05.

TABLE 3

Summary of the Incidence of Fetal Malformations*

 

Dose levels (mg/kg/day)

 

No. examined

Litters

18

18

20

21

Fetuses externally

240

238

263

260

Fetuses viscerally

119

118

132

129

Fetuses skeletally

121

121

132

132

 

No.of fetuses (No. Of litters) affected

Malformations observed

 

 

 

 

Anophthalmia

1 (1)

 

 

 

Microphthalmia

 

 

 

2(2)

Gastroschisis

 

 

1(1)

 

Omphalocele

 

 

 

2(2)

Tail agenesis

 

 

1(1)

 

Tarsal flexure

 

 

1(1)

 

Edema

 

 

1(1)

 

Malformed skull bones

 

 

1(1)

 

Bent clavicle

 

 

1(1)

 

Bent scapula

 

 

1(1)

 

Amelia

 

 

1(1)

 

Micromelia

 

 

1(1)

 

Bent limb bones

1(1)

 

 

1(1)

Vertebral agenesis

 

 

1(1)

 

Pelvic malformation

 

 

1(1)

 

Total fetuses (litters) with malformations

2(2)

0(0)

1(1)

5(4)

* No statistical significance was observed.

TABLE 4

Summary of the Incidence of Fetal Variations*

 

Summary of the Incidence of Fetal Variations*

 

Dose levels (mg/kg/day)

 

0

100

300

1000

 

No. examined

Litters

18

18

20

21

Fetuses externally

240

238

263

260

Fetuses viscerally

119

118

132

129

Fetuses skeletally

121

121

132

132

 

No.of fetuses (No. Of litters) affected

Developmental variations observed

 

 

 

 

Renal papillae not developed

 

1(1)

1(1)

 

Distended ureter

 

1(1)

1(1)

 

Skull reduced in ossification

2(1)

3(2)

2(2)

 

Hyoid unossified

1(1)

 

1(1)

1(1)

25 presacral vertebrae

 

 

1(1)

2(2)

Greater than 13 pairs of full ribs

 

 

2(2)

 

14th rudimentary rib(s)

6(3)

7(4)

12(5)

6(5)

Bent ribs

 

1(1)

 

2(1)

7th cervical rib

3(3)

 

2(2)

 

Vertebrae reduced in ossification

1(1)

 

1(1)

 

Misaligned sternebra(e)

8(6)

6(5)

8(6)

4(3)

Sternebra 5 and/or 6 unossified

3(5)

7(6)

4(4)

8(6)

Other sternebra(e) unossified

1(1)

 

1(1)

1(1)

Ischia reduced in ossification

1(1)

 

 

2(1)

Total fetuses (litters) with developmental variations

22(12)

24(11)

30(14)

22(12)

* No statistical significance was observed.

Conclusions:
NOAEL was considered to be 300 mg/kg bw for P generation and 1000 mg/kg for F1 generation when Sprague-Dawleyd female rats were treated with Quat-Silsesquioxane orally by gavage from day 6 to 15 of gestation.
Executive summary:

In a developmental toxicity reproductive toxicity was evaluated in Sprague-Dawley female rats by using Quat-Silsesquioxane in the concentration of 0, 100, 300, or 1000 mg/kg/day orally by gavage in corn oil.No maternal mortality and clinical signs or behavioral changes were observed in treated female rats as compared to control. No effect on body weight and feed consumption changes were observed in treated female rats as compared to control. Similarly, no effect number of corpora lutea, number of live fetuses per litter, litter size, mean fetal body weight, or mean crown-rump length was observed in treated rats. Ratio of male and female pups at the 1000 mg/ kg/day dose level was significantly different from the control group but was not considered treatment related. Slight but significant increase in relative liver weight of treated female rats was observed as compared to control. In addition, No developmental parameter such as viability, fetal body weight and external malformations were observed in treated fetuses as compared to control. One fetus with bent limb bones, two fetuses from different mothers with microphthalmia and two other fetuses with omphalocele were observed at 1000 mg/kg/day and single fetus with multiple malformations were observed at 300 mg/kg/day in treated fetuses as compared to control. The incidence of developmental variations in the treated litters was not significantly increased over the control incidence. They occurred in low frequency and were distributed randomly across the Quat-Silsesquioxane treated and control groups. Therefore,NOAEL was considered to be 300 mg/kg bw for P generation and 1000 mg/kg for F1 generation when Sprague-Dawley female rats were treated with Quat-Silsesquioxane orally by gavage from day 6 to 15 of gestation.

Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
1 000 mg/kg bw/day
Study duration:
subacute
Species:
rat
Quality of whole database:
Data is Klimisch 2 and from peer-reviewed journal
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Additional information

Developmental toxicity:

Data available for target 1-Octadecanaminium- N,N-dimethyl-N-{3- (trimethoxysilyl)propyl}- chloride (CAS no 27668-52-6) for developmental toxicity are summarized as below 

In a study conducted by Siddiquiet al(1993),reproductive toxicity was evaluated in Sprague-Dawley female rats by using Quat-Silsesquioxane in the concentration of 0, 100, 300, or 1000 mg/kg/day orally by gavage in corn oil.No maternal mortality and clinical signs or behavioral changes were observed in treated female rats as compared to control. No effect on body weight and feed consumption changes were observed in treated female rats as compared to control. Similarly, no effect number of corpora lutea, number of live fetuses per litter, litter size, mean fetal body weight, or mean crown-rump length was observed in treated rats. Ratio of male and female pups at the 1000 mg/ kg/day dose level was significantly different from the control group but was not considered treatment related. Slight but significant increase in relative liver weight of treated female rats was observed as compared to control. In addition, No developmental parameter such as viability, fetal body weight and external malformations were observed in treated fetuses as compared to control. One fetus with bent limb bones, two fetuses from different mothers with microphthalmia and two other fetuses with omphalocele were observed at 1000 mg/kg/day and single fetus with multiple malformations were observed at 300 mg/kg/day in treated fetuses as compared to control. The incidence of developmental variations in the treated litters was not significantly increased over the control incidence. They occurred in low frequency and were distributed randomly across the Quat-Silsesquioxane treated and control groups. Therefore,NOAEL was considered to be 300 mg/kg bw for P generation and 1000 mg/kg for F1 generation when Sprague-Dawley female rats were treated with Quat-Silsesquioxane orally by gavage from day 6 to 15 of gestation.

In a study conducted byDupont Chem Co (1992),teratogenicity was evaluated inAlbinofemale rats by using Dow Corninc @Q9-5700 in the concentration of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg orally. 1 nongravid rats died at 1000 mg/kg and 1 pregnant rats died at 100 mg/kg as compared to control. No untoward behavioral reactions were observed in treated female rats as compared to control.Similarly,Noeffect on gestation andgross pathological changes were observed in treated female rat as compared to control. In addition, No effect on fetuses Body weight were observed as compared to control. No teratogenic external abnormalities and skeletal and internal developmental effect were observed in treated fetuses as compared to control. Therefore, NOAEL was considered to be 1000 mg/kg for P and F1 generation when  Albinofemale rats were treated with Dow Corninc @Q9-5700 orally from gestation days 6 through 15.

Thus, based on the above available data for targetQuat-Silsesquioxane(CAS no 27668-52-6) is likely to be non hazardous as developmental toxicant.

Justification for selection of Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route:

NOAEL was considered to be 300 mg/kg bw for P generation and 1000 mg/kg for F1 generation when Sprague-Dawley female rats were treated with Quat-Silsesquioxane orally by gavage from day 6 to 15 of gestation.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the above available data for targetQuat-Silsesquioxane(CAS no 27668-52-6) is likely to be non hazardous as reproductive and developmental toxicant.

Additional information