Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 619-447-3 | CAS number: 99607-70-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- According to OECD guideline No. 211 and OPPTS Test Guideline 850.1300
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on test solutions:
- N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) was used for the preparation of the application solutions. DMF concentration in the test solutions: 100 uL DMF per litre test water.
- Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- females of a clone of the species Daphnia magna Straus.
- Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 21 d
- Post exposure observation period:
- no
- Hardness:
- 2.5 mmol/L (= 250 mg/L) as CaCO3
- Test temperature:
- 19 - 21 °C
- pH:
- 7.6 - 7.9
- Dissolved oxygen:
- >= 8.2 mg/L
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- nominal: 37.5, 75, 150, 300, 600 µg/L
measured: 25.9, 54, 98, 202, 437 µg/L (time weighted mean concentration) - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 437 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 437 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 437 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- No significant effect was determined on the survival, reproduction rate and body length of the daphnids up to and including the highest test concentration. Therefore the 21-day no observed effect concentration (NOEC) value for cloquintocet-mexyl was 437 µg/L (nominal 600 µg/L).
- Executive summary:
The effects of cloquintocet-mexyl on the survival, body length and reproduction of Daphnia magna were investigated in a semi-static test over 21 days conducted under GLP to OECD TG 211. The nominal test concentrations were 37.5, 75, 150, 300 and 600 µg/L, and the time-weighted average measured concentrations were between 65 and 73% of nominal concentrations. All effect concentrations were therefore based on the measured concentrations. No significant toxic effects of the test item on the survival or on the mean reproduction rate of parental daphnids was determined up to and including the highest test concentration of 437 µg/L (nominal 600 µg/L) over the period of 21 days. In addition, no significant effects on the mean length, nor any visible abnormalities, were observed in the daphnids at the highest test concentration. Therefore, the highest concentration of cloquintocet-mexyl tested without toxic effects after an exposure period of 21 days (21-day NOEC) was at least 437 µg/L.
Reference
Description of key information
21-day NOEC >0.437 mg/L (mean measured), water flea (OECD TG 211)
21 -day NOEC for the main metabolite = 32 mg/L (nominal), water flea (OECD TG 211)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Two studies on the long-term toxicity of cloquintocet-mexyl to aquatic invertebrates are available. These studies were conducted to GLP and OECD TG 211.
A reliable 21-day semi-static reproduction test with Daphnia magna was performed by Bätscher (2003). Cloquintocet-mexyl had no toxic effects on survival, reproduction, and on the growth of Daphnia magna at concentrations up to 0.437 mg/L (mean measured concentration for nominal test concentration of 0.6 mg/L). Therefore the 21-day NOEC was >0.437 mg/L in this study.
A second study by Vial (1990) investigated the toxicity of cloquintocet-mexyl to Daphnia magna according to OECD TG 202, Part 2 (1984). The 21-day reproduction NOEC was reported as 0.002 mg /L. However, due to methodological deficiencies in the preparation of test solutions and issues with inhomogeneous distribution of test material in the media, this study is considered as non-reliable and will not be used in the hazard characterisation.
The study by Bätscher (2003) used Dimethylformamide (DMF) as a solvent (max. 0.1 mL/L medium), which is acceptable according to OECD TG 23 for testing of difficult substances. In the study by Vial (1990), a stock solution was prepared 3x/week by making up 10 mg test substance to 1L with test water, but the study report does not indicate how this was achieved (e.g. intensive stirring, ultrasonication).
Since the nominal test concentrations were close to the water solubility limit of cloquintocet-mexyl (0.6 mg/L) in both tests, it can be assumed that the substance was more homogeneously distributed in the study of Bätscher (2003) where solvent was used to prepare the test media. A statement in the Vial (1990) report that “the Day 14 (in freshly renewed medium) recoveries were too high, probably due to heterogenicity of the distribution of the test substance in the test vessels”, appears to support this view. Further evidence is provided by the study results. In the Bätscher (2003) test no or little mortalities of adult daphnids were found across the whole concentration range. By contrast, Vial (1990) reported that mortality increased (only from day 8 onwards) on a variable basis between the concentrations and large changes from one day to the next were observed. It is suggested that this was a result of the inhomogeneous distribution of the test substance, perhaps even the availability of small particles which were taken up by the daphnids (which are filter-feeders) resulting in these “over-night”/acute events of toxicity. This makes the test results unreliable.
A reliable study on the survival and reproduction of Daphnia magna was conducted to OECD TG 211 with the main environmental metabolite of cloquintocet-mexyl (Hertl 1997). This study was GLP compliant and is considered to be reliable without restrictions. Based on nominal test item concentrations, the 21-day NOEC of the metabolite was 32 mg/L.
This demonstrates that cloquintocet-mexyl has more severe long-term effects on aquatic freshwater invertebrates than its main environmental metabolite.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.