Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-196-5 | CAS number: 92-84-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Additionally to the bacterial reverse mutation tests (Ames tests) reported as part of this registration dossier, there are several other studies available in the literature, none of which indicated any positive result in this assay.
Regarding mutagenicity to mammalian cells some contradictory study summaries were found. Four studies, which were only available as an abstract indicated that four different qualities of phenothiazine were all negative in the mouse lymphoma assay. One further study indicated that under certain conditions an increased number of mutants was found. However, none of these five studies was available as a full study report, hence making it not possible to reliably identify the most relevant study. In a newly conducted OECD 476 study it was found that under certain conditions (i.e. without metabolic activation, 4 hrs exposure) a weak, yet dose-dependent increase in mutants was found. However, the absolute number of mutants generally was in the range of the historical controls of the facility. The relative increase was only slightly above the threshold of 2, which is indicative for a mutagenic effect. Additionally, two further phenomena were observed: i) precipitation of the test item and ii) phenothiazine exhibited a high cytotoxicity, beginning at concentrations of 2 mM and persisted up to 10 mM representing the highest concentration tested. Mutagenicity as indicated by slightly exceeding the threshold of 2 was found at the two highest concentrations only. Relative total growth decrease to about 10 -20 % for these concentrations, hence making cytotoxicity quite apparent. To secure this finding, a repetition experiment considering long-term exposure (in accordance with OECD 476) was conducted. In the repetition experiment the threshold of two was not exceeded for the cells exposed to phenothiazine (without metabolic activation). Also, with metabolic activation no indication for an increased rate of mutations was found that could be attributed to phenothiazine exposure.
One study on cytogenicity was partly available to the consortium. Here, effects of phenothiazine on sister chromatid exchange were assessed. As a result it was found that phenothiazine induces sister chromatid exchange either with or without metabolic activation. However, the study is only partly available not allowing a conclusive decision on reliability. Additionally, possible clastogenic effects due to phenothiazine exposure were examined in an in vivo assay conducted at the NTP. Here, sufficient data to judge reliability is available. As a result no indication for clastogenicity due to phenothiazine exposure was found. Following the guidance given by ECHA a negative in vivo result overrules a positive in vitro finding.Short description of key information:
Bacterial reverse mutation test (Ames test)
- Two NTP-studies were available
- Studies conducted according to GLP and recent NTP-protocols
- Result: negative
In vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test (mouse lymphoma assay)
- Study conducted according to OECD 476 and GLP
- High cytotoxicity was observed with and without metabolic activation
- In one subset a weak yet dose dependent increase in mutants was found
- However, the absolute number of mutants was generally within the range of historical controls. In the repetition experiment with long-term exposure (24 hrs) this increase was not found again.
- Result: equivocal
In vivo micronucleus
- Study conducted according to GLP and recent NTP-protocol
- Bone marrow was evaluated
- Result: negative
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the present studies available classification of phenothiazine as genotoxic according to the provisions laid down in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 is not justified.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.