Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

The results are read across from the free acid form. Read across is applicable based on the content of sodium ions. The presence of these is determined by the pH of the isolation of the dyestuff itself. Therefore the substance to be registered is deemed to be a mixture of free acid, mono and di sodium salts. Upon comparison of the NMR-Spectra of the substance to be registered and the read across chemical it is evident that the chemical shifts as well as the integrations are the same, hence it is difficult to quantify free acid, mono and di variants. The CAS number proposed for the substance to be registered covers the sodium element. The associated free acid has a unique CAS number; this is referenced in the substance identity, as does the disodium variant, which is also referenced.

The substance was negative in the following tests:

1) Ames Test - salmonella

2) Prival Test - salmonella

3) In vitro chromosome aberration test – human lymphocytes

 

The bacterial reverse mutation tests, showed that the substance does not have any mutagenic properties in different Salmonella and E. Coli strains. In addition, no genotoxic properties have been seen in the in vitro chromosome aberration test. Repeat-dose studies with oral treatment in rats did not reveal any tumorigenic properties which could be related to the administration of the test substance.


Short description of key information:
No genotoxic effects were noted in in-vitro mutagenicity and clastogenicity studies.

Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)

Justification for classification or non-classification

The above studies have all been ranked reliability 1 according to the Klimisch et al system. This ranking was deemed appropriate because the studies were conducted to GLP an in compliance with agreed protocols. Sufficient dose ranges and numbers are detailed; hence it is appropriate for use based on reliability and animal welfare grounds. 

The above results triggered no classification under the Dangerous Substance Directive (67/548/EEC) and the CLP Regulation (EC No 1272/2008). No classification for prolonged effects is therefore required.