Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1980
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Before GLP implementation

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1980
Report date:
1980

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
no
Test type:
acute toxic class method
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Dimethyl 3-oxoglutarate
EC Number:
217-385-8
EC Name:
Dimethyl 3-oxoglutarate
Cas Number:
1830-54-2
Molecular formula:
C7H10O5
IUPAC Name:
dimethyl 3-oxoglutarate
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): P5110
- Molecular formula (if other than submission substance):
- Molecular weight (if other than submission substance):
- Smiles notation (if other than submission substance):
- InChl (if other than submission substance):
- Structural formula attached as image file (if other than submission substance):
- Substance type: organic
- Physical state: clear liquid
- Analytical purity:
- Impurities (identity and concentrations):
- Composition of test material, percentage of components:
- Isomers composition:
- Purity test date:
- Lot/batch No.:
- Expiration date of the lot/batch:
- Radiochemical purity (if radiolabelling):
- Specific activity (if radiolabelling):
- Locations of the label (if radiolabelling):
- Expiration date of radiochemical substance (if radiolabelling):
- Stability under test conditions: stable
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature
- Other:

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Batin and Kingman Ltd., Grimston, Aldbrough, Nr. Hull
- Age at study initiation:
- Weight at study initiation: 142 -167 g
- Fasting period before study: overnight (18-20 hrs)
- Housing: Groups of 2 (dose-range finding study); Groups of 5 (main study) by sex and dose group in solid bottomed plastic cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 6 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 -25
- Humidity (%): 40-60
- Air changes (per hr):
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 h/12 h

IN-LIFE DATES: From: To:

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
corn oil
Details on oral exposure:
VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle:
Dose range finding test: 5, 25, 125, 500 mg/ml
Main study: 200, 283, 400, 566 mg/ml

- Amount of vehicle (if gavage):
- Justification for choice of vehicle:
- Lot/batch no. (if required):
- Purity:

MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: 5660 mg/kg

DOSAGE PREPARATION (if unusual):

CLASS METHOD (if applicable)
- Rationale for the selection of the starting dose:
Doses:
Dose range-finding study
50 mg/kg
250 mg/kg
1250 mg/kg
5000 mg/kg


Main study
2000 mg/kg
2830 mg/kg
4000 mg/kg
5660 mg/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
Dose range-finding study
50 mg/kg 2 male/2 female
250 mg/kg 2 male/2 female
1250 mg/kg 2 male/2 female
5000 mg/kg 2 male/2 female

Main study
2000 mg/kg 5 male/5 female
2830 mg/kg 5 male/5 female
4000 mg/kg 5 male/5 female
5660 mg/kg 5 male/5 female
Control animals:
not specified
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: 15 min, 1, 2 and 4 hours after the treatment and once daily for 14 days
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight
Statistics:
Probit analisys (Finney D.J. (1964), Statistical Method for Biological Assay, 2nd Edition, London Charles Griffin).

Results and discussion

Preliminary study:
Dose-range finding study
The mortalities indicated an LD50 in the range 1250- 5000 mg/kg.
Effect levelsopen allclose all
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
4 770 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
95% CL:
> 4 216 - < 5 397
Sex:
male
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
4 476 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
95% CL:
> 3 688 - < 5 431
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
5 499 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
95% CL:
> 4 430 - 6 826
Mortality:
Eight animals (4 male, 4 female) treated with 5660 mg/kg and 2 males treated with 4000 mg/kg died during the study. All deaths were recorded between 15 minutes and 24 hours of dosing. No deaths were recorded in animals treated with 2000 and 2830 mg/kg.
Clinical signs:
All sings of toxicity noted in animals treated with 5660 mg/kg occurred during the day of dosing.
Sings commonly recorded in this group were lethargy or prostration, piloerection, hunched posture and slow shallow or laboured respiration.
The 2 surviving animals appeared normal 24 hours after treatment and througout the remainder of the observation period.

Lethargy was also noted in 4 animals treated with 4000 mg/kg between 15 minutes and 1 hour after treatment. Other sings of toxicity recorded during the day of dosing were piloerection and laboured respiration. All surviving animals appeared normal 2 hours after treatment and throughout the observation period.

One female treated with 2830 mg/kg appeared lethargic with piloerection 1 hour after dosing. This animal recovered and no further signs of toxicity were noted during the observation period.

All animals treated with 2000 mg/kg appered normal throughout the observation period.
Body weight:
All surviving animals showed normal body weight gain throughout the observation period.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not classified
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
According to the results acute oral toxic classification is not needed.