Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
22 Feb 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2017
Report date:
2017

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 117 (Partition Coefficient (n-octanol / water), HPLC Method)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: EU A.24
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Landesamt für Umwelt, Wasserwirtschaft und Gewerbeaufsicht Kaiser-Friedrich-Straße 7, 55116 Mainz, Germany
Type of method:
HPLC method
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Disodium 4,5-dihydroxybenzene-1,3-disulphonate
EC Number:
205-741-5
EC Name:
Disodium 4,5-dihydroxybenzene-1,3-disulphonate
Cas Number:
149-45-1
Molecular formula:
C6H6O8S2.2Na
IUPAC Name:
disodium 4,5-dihydroxybenzene-1,3-disulphonate

Study design

Analytical method:
high-performance liquid chromatography

Results and discussion

Partition coefficient
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
< 0.3
Temp.:
25 °C
pH:
6.5

Any other information on results incl. tables

Final Results

With the calculated capacity factors for the test item, each log Pow from the three determinations should be calculated. Finally, mean and standard deviation of the log Pow should be calculated.

This was not feasible here because k is negative. The retention time of the test item is lower than the retention time of thiourea, which was used for the determination of the dead time of the method. Therefore, the log Pow of the test item AF-378 is not calculable and stated as < 0.3.

Individual Results

Test Item AF-378: Measurement Data -

The retention times of the test item are presented in the following table:

Measurement

RT

min

Measurement 1

1.344

Measurement 2

1.344

Measurement 3

1.335

Mean

1.341

Standard deviation

0.005

Calculated Values

The calculated values are presented in the following table:

Measurement

k

log k

log POW

Measurement 1

-0.0918

not calculable*

not calculable*

Measurement 2

-0.0918

not calculable*

not calculable*

Measurement 3

-0.0978

not calculable*

not calculable*

* Not calculable, because k is negative. The retention time of test item is lower than the retention time of thiourea, which was used for the determination of the dead time of the method.

 

For each reference item, the calculated capacity factors are presented in the following table.

 

Compound

Retention Time Mean

Retention T ime Stand.Dev.

RetentionTime Relative Stand. Dev.

k

min

min

%

 

Thiourea

1.480

0.003

0.214

0.0000

2-Butanone

1.967

0.003

0.144

0.3292

Benzylalcohol

2.373

0.005

0.214

0.6038

Acetophenone

2.970

0.010

0.347

1.0069

Nitrobenzene

3.535

0.016

0.457

1.3891

Benzene

5.031

0.029

0.581

2.4000

Toluene

8.065

0.066

0.815

4.4502

Validity of Results

The test item showed one peak with a retention time 1.341 min with a very low standard deviation of 0.005 min. The determination was precise. The calculation of the log Pow of the test item peak is not possible, because the retention time of the test item peak was lower than the retention time of thiourea (1.480 min). The log Pow of the test item AF-378 is stated as < 0.3.

 

Discussion of Results

Variations in the retention times of reference items and test item are very small. Therefore, a stable configuration of the HPLC-column can be assumed. As the calculated log Pow of the test item peak lay below the lowest log Pow of the reference items (2-Butanone with log Pow 0.3), the log Pow of this peak is stated as < 0.3. No observations were made which might cause doubts concerning the validity of the study outcome.

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion