Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

In a LLNA in mice as well as in a maximisation test in guinea pigs no sensitising potential was observed.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2012
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: OECD 429 done under GLP with a well defined test substances of acceptable purity
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA
Sex:
female
Vehicle:
propylene glycol
Concentration:
25%, 10%, or 5% w/w in propylene glycol
No. of animals per dose:
5
Parameter:
SI
Remarks on result:
other: 0.76 (5%), 1.25 (10%, and 1.35 (25%)
Parameter:
other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
Remarks on result:
other: 1869 (control), 1419 (5%), 2332 (10%), and 2523 (25%)
Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated informationCriteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The test item was considered to be a non-sensitiser under the conditions of the test.
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2000
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Study pre-dates accepability of LLNA
Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
other: Pirbright-White guinea pig
Sex:
female
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: sesame oil
Concentration / amount:
25 %
Day(s)/duration:
2
Adequacy of induction:
other: Treatment was done at the site of previous interdermal injections
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
other: sesame oil
Concentration / amount:
1 %
Day(s)/duration:
single injections
Adequacy of induction:
highest technically applicable concentration used
No.:
#1
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: sesame oil
Concentration / amount:
25 %
Day(s)/duration:
1
Adequacy of challenge:
highest non-irritant concentration
Challenge controls:
10 for treatment, 5 for control
Positive control substance(s):
no
Positive control results:
not specified, because of separate report, but positive results were obtained.
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
25 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
25 %
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the present study, none of ten animals of the treatment group showed a positive skin response after the challenge procedure.
Thus, the percentage of animals reacting positive is 0% ( below the threshold of 30 %).
Based on the results of this study the test item showed no evidence for sensitizing properties.
Executive summary:

Testing for sensitizing properties of the test item was performed in female guinea pigs according to the method of MAGNUSSON & KLIGMAN.

Intradermal induction was performed using 1 % of the test item in sesame oil. Dermal induction and challenge treatment were carried out with 25%

of the test item in sesame oil.

The validity of the test system is confirmed by the periodically conducted positive control test using alpha-hexyl cinnamic aldehyde for the maximization test

Based on the results of this study the test item sh

owed no evidence for sensitizing properties.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification

No classification

In a LLNA in mice no sensitising potential was observed