Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Effects on fertility

Description of key information

Two small clinical studies have suggested that amitriptyline and other tricyclic antidepressants may reduce libido and cause erectile and ejaculatory dysfunction in males.

(Source: REPROTOX® Database: Klasco RK: REPROTOX® Database. Truven Health Analytics, Greenwood Village, Colorado).

Effects on developmental toxicity

Description of key information

Experimental animal studies

Amitriptyline was associated with teratogenic effects in the hamster especially when the benzodiazepine chlordiazepoxide was coadministered. Cranial malformations and encephalocele were predominant among the anomalies reported.

Human pregnancy reports

In humans there has been concern that amitriptyline and other tricyclic antidepressants might cause congenital malformations with specific attention focused on limb reduction defects. One of these reports may be unreliable due to allegations of fraud. In addition, retrospective studies of large populations have failed to show a preponderance of amitriptyline users among mothers of children with congenital limb defects. In a series of 118 pregnancies exposed to amitriptyline, 18 voluntarily aborted, 10 miscarried, 2 were stillborn, and four liveborns had congenital malformations. These figures are similar to what would be anticipated in the general population.

Neurobehavioral testing of 80 children with antenatal exposure to tricyclic antidepressants (of whom 29 had been exposed to amitriptyline) did not demonstrate differences in IQ or behavior compared to 55 children with exposure to fluoxetine or 84 children without antidepressant exposure during gestation. The children ranged in age from 16 to 86 months at the time of testing.

Withdrawal symptoms have been reported in newborns who were exposed to other tricyclic antidepressants in utero. The symptoms observed during the first month of life have included colic, cyanosis, rapid breathing, and irritability.

The pediatrician can be advised in advance that the mother has been taking amitriptyline. Also, nortriptyline a metabolite of amitriptyline, was associated with urinary retention in one newborn. In making decisions about treatment during pregnancy, consideration is given to the potential risks of untreated maternal mental illness.

(Source: REPROTOX® Database: Klasco RK: REPROTOX® Database. Truven Health Analytics, Greenwood Village, Colorado.)

Toxicity to reproduction: other studies

Description of key information

Summary of Use during Lactation

Milk levels of amitriptyline and its metabolites are low. Immediate side effects have not been reported and a limited amount of follow-up has found no adverse effects on infant growth and development. Amitriptyline use during breastfeeding would usually not be expected to cause any adverse effects in breastfed infants, especially if the infant is older than 2 months. However, rare sedation has been reported in a neonate. Other agents with fewer active metabolites may be preferred when large doses are required or while nursing a newborn or preterm infant.

Drug Levels

Maternal Levels Amitriptyline is metabolized to nortriptyline which has antidepressant activity equal to amitriptyline's.

A mother who had been taking amitriptyline 100 mg daily for 6 weeks postpartum had breastmilk levels of amitriptyline and nortriptyline of 151 and 59 mcg/L, respectively, 16 hours after a dose. Eleven days later, breastmilk levels of amitriptyline and nortriptyline were 135 and 52 mcg/L, respectively, 14 hours after the dose. The amounts in milk represent an infant dosage of about 1.8% of the maternal weight-adjusted dosage.

Amitriptyline and nortriptyline were measured in breastmilk in a mother who was taking amitriptyline 75 mg daily. Her milk amitriptyline levels were 104 and 72 mcg/L and her nortriptyline levels were 75 and 63 mcg/L at 2 and 10 weeks, respectively, after starting treatment (time after dose not specified). After 19 weeks of therapy, an amitriptyline dose of 25 mg daily produced milk amitriptyline levels of 30 mcg/L; nortriptyline levels were not detectable (<30 mcg/L). The authors estimated that this infant would receive 1% of the maternal weight-adjusted dosage.

Another mother who was taking amitriptyline 175 mg daily had amitriptyline and nortriptyline milk levels of 13 and 15 mcg/L each on the morning and evening of the first day of therapy. On days 2 to 26 of therapy, milk amitriptyline ranged from 23 to 38 mcg/L. On day 26 milk nortriptyline was about 64 mcg/L. E-10-hydroxynortriptyline was found in milk in levels averaging 89 mcg/L over this 26-day time period.

A 2-week postpartum mother of a preterm infant had been taking amitriptyline 100 mg daily for 4 days when milk was analyzed. Milk amitriptyline levels were highest at 1.5 and 6 hours after the dose at 103 and 100 mcg/L, respectively. They fell to 29 mcg/L 24 hours after the dose. Milk nortriptyline levels were highest at 18 hours after the dose at 58 mcg/L. Using the peak milk level data from this study, an exclusively breastfed infant would receive an estimated maximum of 0.9% of the maternal weight-adjusted dosage.

Two mothers who were taking amitriptyline had milk samples taken 12 to 15 hours after their daily dose. The mother taking 100 mg daily had a foremilk level of 30 mcg/L and a hindmilk level of 113 mcg/L. The mother taking 175 mg daily had a hindmilk level of 197 mcg/L. Using the hindmilk data from this study, an exclusively breastfed infant would receive an estimated maximum of 1% of the maternal weight-adjusted dosage.

Infant Levels. A mother who had been taking amitriptyline 150 mg daily for 3 weeks was nursing her infant (extent not stated). Amitriptyline and nortriptyline were undetectable (<28 mcg/L) in the infant's serum.

A mother who had been taking amitriptyline 100 mg daily for 7.5 weeks postpartum was nursing her infant. Amitriptyline and nortriptyline were undetectable (<10 mcg/L) 14 hours after a dose.

A 3-week-old breastfed had undetectable serum amitriptyline (<5 mcg/L) and nortriptyline (<15 mcg/L) during maternal amitriptyline use of 75 mg daily.

After 26 days of breastfeeding (4 of 6 daily feedings; 500 to 600 mL daily) during maternal use of amitriptyline 175 mg daily, amitriptyline and its metabolites were undetectable in the serum of one infant.

One infant whose mother was taking amitriptyline 100 mg daily, had a plasma level of 7.5 mcg/L at an unspecified time after the maternal dosage.

Effects in Breastfed Infants

At least 23 infants have been reported to have been exposed to amitriptyline in breastmilk with no reports of adverse reactions with maternal dosages from 75 to 175 mg daily.

Follow-up for 1 to 3 years in a group of 20 breastfed infants whose mothers were taking a tricyclic antidepressant found no adverse effects on growth and development. One of the mothers whose infant was followed up at 18 months of age was taking amitriptyline 150 mg daily. Two small controlled studies indicate that other tricyclic antidepressants have no adverse effect on infant development. In one of the studies, 2 mothers were taking amitriptyine 100 and 175 mg daily. One of the infants tested in the low normal range from birth and on repeat testing.

In another study, 25 infants whose mothers took a tricyclic antidepressant during pregnancy and lactation were tested formally between 15 to 71 months and found to have normal growth and development. Some of the mothers were taking amitriptyline.

A nursing mother was prescribed amitriptyline 10 mg daily for insomnia. After 3 days of the medication, her 15-day-old infant developed severe sedation and an estimated 80% decrease in breastfeeding because of the sedation. The infant was otherwise normal on examination. The drug was discontinued and symptoms decreased within 24 hours and were absent after 48 hours. Amitriptyline was restarted at 10 mg daily. The same effects reappeared in the infant and again disappeared by 48 hours after discontinuation of the drug.

Effects on Lactation and Breastmilk

Amitriptyline has caused increased prolactin levels in nonpregnant, nonnursing patients. The clinical relevance of these findings in nursing mothers is not known. The prolactin level in a mother with established lactation may not affect her ability to breastfeed.

An observational study looked at outcomes of 2859 women who took an antidepressant during the 2 years prior to pregnancy. Compared to women who did not take an antidepressant during pregnancy, mothers who took an antidepressant during all 3 trimesters of pregnancy were 37% less likely to be breastfeeding upon hospital discharge. Mothers who took an antidepressant only during the third trimester were 75% less likely to be breastfeeding at discharge. Those who took an antidepressant only during the first and second trimesters did not have a reduced likelihood of breastfeeding at discharge. The antidepressants used by the mothers were not specified.

A retrospective cohort study of hospital electronic medical records from 2001 to 2008 compared women who had been dispensed an antidepressant during late gestation (n = 575; amitriptyline n = 30) to those who had a psychiatric illness but did not receive an antidepressant (n = 1552) and mothers who did not have a psychiatric diagnosis (n = 30,535). Women who received an antidepressant were 37% less likely to be breastfeeding at discharge than women without a psychiatric diagnosis, but no less likely to be breastfeeding than untreated mothers with a psychiatric diagnosis.

(Source: Drugs and Lactation Database [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). Available from: http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/newtoxnet/lactmed.htm)

Justification for classification or non-classification

Overall, available data are sufficient to classify the substance as Repr. 2 H361d.

Additional information