Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

The test item is not irritating to skin according to the OECD Guideline 439.

The test item is not irritating to eye according to OECD Guideline 437.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
September 06, 2011 - October 07, 2011
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.46 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model Test)
Version / remarks:
2009
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
Version / remarks:
2010
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Skinethic skin irritation test -42bis Standard operating procedure (SOP)
Version / remarks:
2009
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Batch: OS11008922
Appearance: Pale yellow powder without visible impurities
Released until: August 15, 2016

Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Cell type:
non-transformed keratinocytes
Cell source:
foreskin from a single donor
Justification for test system used:
standard model
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Remarks:
No vehicle used in this study; The test item was applied neat to the tissues.
Details on test system:
CELL CULTURE
- Supplier: SkinEthic Laboratories, Nice, France)
- Source: human keratinocytes cultured on a polycarbonate filter in conditions which permit their terminal differentiation
- Format: 24 well plate


TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment: room temperature
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation: 37°C

REMOVAL OF THE TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROL
After the end of the treatment interval, the residual test item was removed immediately by gently rinsing with a minimum volume of 25 mL PBS using a pipette. Excess PBS was removed by gently shaking the inserts and blotting the bottom with blotting paper.

Control samples:
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount/concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL: 16 mg of solid test material
NEGATIVE CONTROL: 16 µL (Dulbecco`s Phosphate-Buffered Saline)
POSITIVE CONTROL: 16 µL (5% aqueous solution of sodium dodecyl sulfate in deionised water)
Duration of treatment / exposure:
42 min (± 1 minute)
Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
42 hours (± 1 hour)
Number of replicates:
3
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Run / experiment:
Experiment 1 / Run 1
Value:
87.73
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Remarks:
The test item was applied neat to the tissues
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Under the experimental conditions reported, the test material is not irritating to the skin.
Executive summary:

An in vitro skin irritation test with the test item was performed according to OECD Guideline 439. Triplicates of the human skin model RHE™ (Reconstructed Human Epidermis, SkinEthic) were treated with the test material, the negative or the positive control for 42 minutes (± 1 minute). 16 μL of either the negative control (PBS-buffer) or the positive control (aqueous solution of sodium dodecyl sulfate) were applied to each tissue. Before adding the solid test material, 10 μL of deionised water was spread to the epidermis surface to improve further

contact between the test material and the epidermis. Afterwards, 16 mg of the test material were applied to each tissue.

The tissue viability after treatment with the test material was higher than 50 % (mean viability: 87.73 %). Therefore, the test material is not considered to possess an irritant potential to the skin.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
October 22 - December 16, 2014
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
Version / remarks:
2013
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU method B.47 (Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants)
Version / remarks:
2008
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Batch: OS11008922
Appearance: Pale yellow powder without visible impurities
Released until: August 15, 2016
Storage: Tightly closed, dark at room temperature (15 to 25°C)
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Controls:
yes, concurrent vehicle
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL: 750 µL (i.e. 150mg/750µL)

NEGATIVE / VEHICLE CONTROL: 750 µL

Designation: 0.9% sodium chloride solution
Supplier: B. Braun Melsungen AG, Germany
Batch: 13445011
Released until: September 2016

POSITIVE CONTROL: 750 µL

Designation: Art. 814223
Synonym: Imidazole
Supplier: Merck KGaA, Germany
Batch: S6746923
Released until: August 31, 2018
Imidazole was dissolved with 0.9% sodium chloride solution to a concentration of 20% (w/v).

Duration of treatment / exposure:
240 minutes
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
in vitro: triplicate design
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
Run 1 / Experiment 1
Value:
1
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Other effects / acceptance of results:
OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: No observations (e.g. tissue peeling, residual test chemical, non-uniform opacity patterns) were seen in a visually inspection of the corneas after treatment.

ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: After treatment with the negative control (0.9% sodium chloride solution) the calculated IVIS was 1.1.
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: Treatment with the positive control (20% Imidazole) revealed an IVIS of 98.0. Therefore, the study fulfilled the validity criteria.

Therefore, the study fulfilled the acceptance criteria.
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the present study, the test item did not show an eye hazard potential. The test item is not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage (UN GHS: No Category).
Executive summary:

Under the conditions of the present study, the test item did not show an eye hazard potential. The test item is not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage (UN GHS: No Category).

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the available results, the test item is not considered to be classified for skin and eye irritation according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.