Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
October 12-19, 2004
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
According to OECD Guideline 429, with GLP.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2004
Report date:
2004

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
A mixture of: propan-2-one-O,O'-(methoxymethylsilandiyl)dioxime; propan-2-one-O-(dimethoxymethylsilyl)oxime; propan-2-one-O,O',O''-(methylsilantriyl)trioxime
EC Number:
460-110-3
EC Name:
A mixture of: propan-2-one-O,O'-(methoxymethylsilandiyl)dioxime; propan-2-one-O-(dimethoxymethylsilyl)oxime; propan-2-one-O,O',O''-(methylsilantriyl)trioxime
Cas Number:
797751-43-0
Molecular formula:
not applicable, multiconstituent substance
IUPAC Name:
2,5,8-trimethyl-5-{[(propan-2-ylidene)amino]oxy}-4,6-dioxa-3,7-diaza-5-silanona-2,7-diene; 3-methoxy-3,6-dimethyl-2,4-dioxa-5-aza-3-silahept-5-ene; 5-methoxy-2,5,8-trimethyl-4,6-dioxa-3,7-diaza-5-silanona-2,7-diene
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Wasox-MMAC2
- Physical state: Clear liquid.
- Lot/batch No.: 1000024854.
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: December 2005.
- Storage condition of test material: Storage under a nitrogen atmosphere at ambient temperature
- Other: Handling precautions: Exothermic reaction with water or humidity from the air.

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Winkelman
- Age at study initiation: 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 17.0-19.9 g
- Housing: single caging. Makrolon cages type II
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21.8 ºC (average)
- Humidity (%): 48.2% (average)
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): only artificial light from 6.00 a.m. to 6.00 p. m.

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
Concentration:
High dose: 100% test substance (as it is).
Mid dose: 50% (v/v) solution of the test substance in acetone:olive oil.
Low dose: 25% (v/v) solution of the test substance in acetone:olive oil.
No. of animals per dose:
five female mice/dose level.
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- Compound solubility: Solubility testing showed that the test substance solves for at least 50% (v/v) in vehicle AOO.
- Irritation: about 24 hours after the last administration of the test substance as it is (100%) little increase in ear thickness was observed.

TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION:
Administration was performed epicutaneously to the dorsal surface of both ears, once a day on three consecutive days. The volume administered was 25 µL per ear.
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
Application of 25% HCA in AOO resulted in a positive control result of 42767 dpm (desintegrations per minute) and a SI (Stimulation Index) of 10.2. This result proves the sensitivity of the strain of animals used and the reliability of the experimental technique.

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1
Test group / Remarks:
Negative control
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1
Test group / Remarks:
Low dose
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
0.8
Test group / Remarks:
Mid dose
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
0.7
Test group / Remarks:
High dose
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
10.2
Test group / Remarks:
Positive control
Parameter:
other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
Remarks on result:
other: Negative Control: 4197dpm Low Dose: 4217 dpm Mid Dose: 3536 dpm High Dose: 2919 dpm Positive Control: 42767 dpm

Any other information on results incl. tables

Mortality:

All animals survived till the end of the study.

General observations:

One animal of group C had reduced motoric activities on Day 6. In all other animals no abnormal behaviour or clinical signs were detected during the experiment.

Skin reactions:

No local irritations were observed at the application sites of all animals of all test substance groups and both control groups throughout the whole study.

Body masses:

Body masses and body mass gains of all animals were in the range to be expected from animals of the same strain, sex and age.

Body weight loss was noted in 1/5 animals in group B and C.

Body mass of the animals on Days 1 and 6. Individual body masses (b.m.) and body mass gains in g of all animals. Means, standard deviations (SD) and number of animals per group (n).

Group K

(negative control)

Group A

(low dose)

Group B

(mid dose)

Group C

(high dose)

Group P

(positive control)

Animal no,

b.m. on day

b.m. gain

Animal no,

b.m. on Day

b.m. gain

Animal no,

b.m. on Day

b.m. gain

Animal no,

b.m. on Day

b.m. gain

Animal no,

b.m, on Day

b.m. gain

1

6

1

6

1

6

1

6

1

6

1

18.9

21,1

2.2

6

17.8

19.2

1.4

11

19.8

19.4

-0.4

16

19.9

20.9

1.0

21

18.3

19.0

0.7

2

18.7

20.3

1.6

7

17.3

19.3

2.0

12

17.8

20.0

2.2

17

18.6

20.0

1.4

22

19.9

21.3

1.4

3

19.4

20.0

0.6

8

18.8

21.7

2.9

13

17.8

20.8

3.0

18

17.6

16.9

-0.7

23

17.3

18.9

1.6

4

17.8

17.8

0.0

9

18.9

20.1

1.2

14

18.1

20.0

1.9

19

17.3

20.7

3.4

24

18.0

18.9

0.9

5

19.7

21.3

1.6

10

17.0

20.9

3.9

15

18.7

19.5

0.8

20

18.2

19.6

1.4

25

19.3

19.8

0.5

mean

18.9

20.1

1.2

mean

18.0

20.2

2.3

mean

18.4

19.9

1.5

mean

18.3

19.6

1.3

mean

18.6

19.6

1.0

SD

0.7

1.4

0.9

SD

0.9

1.1

1.1

SD

0.8

0.6

1.3

SD

1.0

1.6

1.5

SD

1.0

1.0

0.5

n

5

5

5

n

5

5

5

n

5

5

5

n

5

5

5

n

5

5

5

Simulation index:

Evidence of sensitisation of each challenge concentration:

Results are presented as test/control ratio (Stimulation index), calculated as dpm test group/dpm negative control group, (dpm - disintegrations per minute, corrected by the subtraction of the background).

 

Dpm

SI

Group K (negative control)

4197

1

Group A (Iow dose)

4217

1.0

Group B (mid dose)

3536

0.8

Group C (high dose)

2919

0.7

Group P (positive control)

42767

10.2

The Sis of the test substance groups were between 0.7 and 1.

Application of 25% HCA in AOO resulted in an SI of 10.2. This result proves the sensitivity of the strain of animals used and the reliability of the experimental technique.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: Not classified (CLP Regulation EC no. 1272/2008)
Conclusions:
The test substance Wasox-MMAC2 is regarded as a non sensitizer in the "Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay", since the SIs of all examined test substance concentrations were clearly smaller than 3.
Executive summary:

The "Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay" for the test substance Wasox-MMAC2 was performed in five groups of 5 female CBA mice (According to OECD Guideline 429). The doses tested were 100% of test material (as it is); 50% (v/v) and 25 % (v/v). The vehicle used was acetone:oil (4:1, v/v) (AOO). A positive control (25% solution of hexyl cinnamic aldehyde in AOO) and a negative control (AOO) were included on the test. Both control substances were administrated under identical conditions as the test substance. The Administration was performed epicutaneously to the dorsal surface of both ears, once a day on three consecutive days. The volume administrated was 25 µl per ear. 5 days after the first topical administration, each animal received 20 µlCi3HTdR by intravenous administration. Approximately 5 hour after 3HTdR injection all animals were sacrificed and the 3HTdR incorporation determinate. The application sites were visually checked for local irritations at least once a day. Body weight was recorded on days 1 and 6 after the administration. The test substance is regarded as a not sensitising, since the SIs of all examined test substance concentrations were clearly smaller than 3, and therefore the substance was determined to be not sensitising.