Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
epidemiological data
Type of information:
other: published data
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1999

Materials and methods

Study type:
cohort study (retrospective)
Endpoint addressed:
skin irritation / corrosion
skin sensitisation
Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Method other: allergic skin reaction in man
Method: In a retrospective survey of allergic reactions to cosmetics, data on 475 patients with contact allergy to cosmetic ingredients were collected in 5 European dermatology centres.
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Hexadecan-1-ol
EC Number:
253-149-0
EC Name:
Hexadecan-1-ol
Cas Number:
36653-82-4
Molecular formula:
C16H34O
IUPAC Name:
hexadecan-1-ol
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report):Cetyl alcohol

Method

Type of population:
general
Ethical approval:
not specified
Details on study design:
In a retrospective survey of allergic reactions to cosmetics, data on 475 patients with contact allergy to cosmetic ingredients were collected in 5 European dermatology centres. The observations were made over a 4 month period in 1996. A positive response to cetyl alcohol was obtained in only 3/475 patients.
Exposure assessment:
estimated

Results and discussion

Results:
The observations were made over a 4 month period in 1996. A positive response to cetyl alcohol was obtained in only 3/475 patients.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
In a retrospective survey of allergic reactions to cosmetics, data on 475 patients with contact allergy to cosmetic ingredients were collected in 5 European dermatology centres. The observations were made over a 4 month period in 1996. A positive response to cetyl alcohol was obtained in only 3/475 patients.