Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 231-659-4 | CAS number: 7681-11-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Genotoxic effects of the test chemical was evaluated in vitro using the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay on CHO cells. The study was performed using CHO cells. The test chemical was dissolved in culture medum and used at dose level of 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5 and 10 mM. In preliminary cytotoxicity assays, CHO cells were exposed for 1 h to the test compound at concentrations ranging from 0.001 to 5 mg/ml. The cells were exposed for 3 h to concentrations of the test compounds of 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5 and 10 mM. Test compound and MMS (30 mg/ml) were dissolved the culture medium. Exponentially growing CHO-K1 cells were plated in a six-well plate on glass coverslips (1.5 X 105cells/well) and cultured 24 h prior to compound treatment. Duplicate coverslips were established for each experiment, and at least two independent experiments were performed. The cells were exposed to the chemicals at different concentrations for 3 h in a FCS free medium. At the end of treatment, cells were washed twice with PBS before a 20 h incubation in fresh medium containing 10% of FCS and 3 mg/ml of cytochalasin B. Thereafter, cells were washed twice with PBS and allowed to recover for 1.5 h in 10% FCS fresh medium. Cells were fixed with cold methanol, stained with acridine orange (62.5 mg/ml) for 5 min and mounted in Sorensen buffer. Slides were coded and blindly examined under an epifluorescence microscope at 1000X magnification under oil immersion. Briefly, the cells should be binucleated (BN) with an intact nuclear membrane and should be situated within the same cytoplasmic boundary. MN should be morphologically identical to but smaller than nuclei, their diameter usually varied between 1/6th and 1/3rd of the mean diameter of the main nuclei. MN should be readily distinguished and not be linked to the main nuclei via nucleoplasmic bridges. Cells showing chromatin condensation or nuclear fragmentation with an intact cytoplasmic membrane were classified as apoptotic cells. One thousand (1000) binucleated cells were scored for each slide. The frequencies of BN, of BN with MN (MNBN) and of apoptotic cells (AP) were estimated. MMS (30 mg/ml), a well known alkylating agent was used as positive control. Cytotoxicity was measured by the BN cell ratio between treated and control slides. Based on the observations made, the test chemical did not induce any increase in the frequency of MNBN cells for doses ranging from 0.625 to 10 mM in the micronucleus assay in the CHO cell line and hence it is not liekly to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from peer reviewed publication
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Refer below principle
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Genotoxic effects of the test chemical was evaluated in vitro using the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay on CHO cells
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
- Target gene:
- No data
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Details on mammalian cell line
- Type and identity of media: The cell line was grown at 37 C in a humidified atmosphere at
5% CO2 in air, in HAM’S F12 medium with L-glutamine supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), penicillin (50 UI/ml) and streptomycine (50 µg/ml). Cells were subcultured 24 h before treatment.
- Properly maintained: Yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: No data
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: No data
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: No data - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Cytokinesis block (if used):
- No data
- Metabolic activation:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation system:
- no data
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5 and 10 mM
- Vehicle / solvent:
- culture medium- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Culture medium
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test chemical was soluble in culture medium - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- not specified
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- MMS (30 µg/ml)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Cell culture procedure
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells were purchased from Eurobio (France). They were routinely maintained from stocks stored in liquid nitrogen. CHO cells were grown at 37 C in a humidified atmosphere at 5% CO2 in air, in HAM’S F12 medium with l-glutamine supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), penicillin (50 UI/ml) and streptomycine (50 mg/ml). Cells were subcultured 24 h before treatment.
Cell treatment
In preliminary cytotoxicity assays, CHO cells were exposed for 1 h to the test compounds at concentrations ranging from 0.001 to 5 mg/ml.
In the alkaline comet assay and in the cytokinesisblock micronucleus assay, cells were exposed for 3 h to concentrations of the test compounds of 0.625, 1.25, 2.5,5 and 10 mM. Tests compounds and MMS (30 mg/ml) were dissolved the culture medium. Etoposide (0.5 mg/ml) was dissolved in DMSO.
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable): 150000 cells/well
DURATION
- Preincubation period: No data
- Exposure duration: 3 hrs
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 20 hrs
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): No data
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): No data
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): No data
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): No data
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Acridine orange
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Duplicate
METHODS OF SLIDE PREPARATION AND STAINING TECHNIQUE USED: Cells were fixed with cold methanol, stained with acridine orange (62.5 mg/ml) for 5 min and mounted in Sorensen buffer. Slides were coded and blindly examined under an epifluorescence microscope at 1000X magnification under oil immersion.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: One thousand (1000) binucleated cells were scored
for each slide.
NUMBER OF METAPHASE SPREADS ANALYSED PER DOSE (if in vitro cytogenicity study in mammalian cells): No data
CRITERIA FOR MICRONUCLEUS IDENTIFICATION: MN should be morphologically identical to but smaller than nuclei, their diameter usually varied between 1/6th and 1/3rd of the mean diameter of the main nuclei. MN should be readily distinguished and not be linked to the main nuclei via nucleoplasmic bridges. Cells showing chromatin condensation or nuclear fragmentation with an intact cytoplasmic membrane were classified as apoptotic cells.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: Yes, Cytotoxicity was measured by the Binucleate cell ratio between treated and control slides
- Any supplementary information relevant to cytotoxicity: No data
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: No data
- Determination of endoreplication: No data
- Methods, such as kinetochore antibody binding, to characterize whether micronuclei contain whole or fragmented chromosomes (if applicable): No data
- OTHER: No data - Rationale for test conditions:
- No data
- Evaluation criteria:
- MN should be morphologically identical to but smaller than nuclei, their diameter usually varied between 1/6th and 1/3rd of the mean diameter of the main nuclei. MN should be readily distinguished and not be linked to the main nuclei via nucleoplasmic bridges. Cells showing chromatin condensation or nuclear fragmentation with an intact cytoplasmic membrane were classified as apoptotic cells.
- Statistics:
- In the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay, data were expressed as the percentage of binucleated cells with micronuclei. Comparisons between control and treated cell cultures were made using ANOVA and Dunnett’s one sided test.
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- not specified
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- Potassium iodate did not induce any increase in the frequency of MNBN cells for doses ranging from 0.625 to 10 mM.
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: No data
- Effects of osmolality: No data
- Evaporation from medium: No data
- Water solubility: No data
- Precipitation: No data
- Definition of acceptable cells for analysis: No data
- Other confounding effects: No data
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: In preliminary cytotoxicity assays, CHO cells were
exposed for 1 h to the test compounds at concentrations ranging from 0.001 to 5 mg/ml.
CYTOKINESIS BLOCK (if used)
- Distribution of mono-, bi- and multi-nucleated cells: No data
NUMBER OF CELLS WITH MICRONUCLEI
- Number of cells for each treated and control culture: No data
- Indication whether binucleate or mononucleate where appropriate: No data
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation and confidence interval (e.g. 95%)
- Positive historical control data: No data
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: No data
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
- Measurement of cytotoxicity used: No data
- Other observations when applicable: No data - Conclusions:
- The test chemical did not induce any increase in the frequency of MNBN cells for doses ranging from 0.625 to 10 mM in the micronucleus assay in the CHO cell line and hence it is not liekly to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
- Executive summary:
Genotoxic effects of the test chemical was evaluated in vitro using the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay on CHO cells. The study was performed using CHO cells. The test chemical was dissolved in culture medum and used at dose level of 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5 and 10 mM. In preliminary cytotoxicity assays, CHO cells were exposed for 1 h to the test compound at concentrations ranging from 0.001 to 5 mg/ml. The cells were exposed for 3 h to concentrations of the test compounds of 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5 and 10 mM. Test compound and MMS (30 mg/ml) were dissolved the culture medium. Exponentially growing CHO-K1 cells were plated in a six-well plate on glass coverslips (1.5 X 105 cells/well) and cultured 24 h prior to compound treatment. Duplicate coverslips were established for each experiment, and at least two independent experiments were performed. The cells were exposed to the chemicals at different concentrations for 3 h in a FCS free medium. At the end of treatment, cells were washed twice with PBS before a 20 h incubation in fresh medium containing 10% of FCS and 3 mg/ml of cytochalasin B. Thereafter, cells were washed twice with PBS and allowed to recover for 1.5 h in 10% FCS fresh medium. Cells were fixed with cold methanol, stained with acridine orange (62.5 mg/ml) for 5 min and mounted in Sorensen buffer. Slides were coded and blindly examined under an epifluorescence microscope at 1000X magnification under oil immersion. Briefly, the cells should be binucleated (BN) with an intact nuclear membrane and should be situated within the same cytoplasmic boundary. MN should be morphologically identical to but smaller than nuclei, their diameter usually varied between 1/6th and 1/3rd of the mean diameter of the main nuclei. MN should be readily distinguished and not be linked to the main nuclei via nucleoplasmic bridges. Cells showing chromatin condensation or nuclear fragmentation with an intact cytoplasmic membrane were classified as apoptotic cells. One thousand (1000) binucleated cells were scored for each slide. The frequencies of BN, of BN with MN (MNBN) and of apoptotic cells (AP) were estimated. MMS (30 mg/ml), a well known alkylating agent was used as positive control. Cytotoxicity was measured by the BN cell ratio between treated and control slides. Based on the observations made, the test chemical did not induce any increase in the frequency of MNBN cells for doses ranging from 0.625 to 10 mM in the micronucleus assay in the CHO cell line and hence it is not liekly to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
Drosophila lethal mutation assay was performed to determine the mutagenic nature of the test chemical in vivo. The study was performed using male Oregon-R stock Drosophila flies. The test chemical was injected into larvae by use of a micro-injectionfollowing the method of Beadle and Ephrussi.As per this method, 0.5-1.0 cubic mm od substance may be injected into each larva. The gonads were thus bathed in the solution. The treatment after injection of 0.038 per cent I2 in 0.075 per cent KI did not produce a significant increase in the lethal mutation rate of the X-chromosome. Based on the observations made, thetest chemical did not induce lethal mutations in X- chromosomes of Drosophila Oregon-R stock and is hence it is not likely to be mutagenic in vivo.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- genetic toxicity in vivo, other
- Remarks:
- Drosophila lethal mutation test
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from peer reviewed publication
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Refer below principle
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- In vivo Drosophila lethal mutation test was performed to determine the mutagenic nature of the test chemical
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- Drosophila SLRL assay
- Species:
- Drosophila melanogaster
- Strain:
- other: Oregon-R stock
- Details on species / strain selection:
- No data
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: No data
- Age at study initiation: No data
- Weight at study initiation: No data
- Assigned to test groups randomly: No data
- Fasting period before study: No data
- Housing: The flies were raised in ½ pint milk bottles
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Standard food of corn meal, molasses and agar, with brewers' yeast added,
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): No data
- Acclimation period: No data
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): No data
- Humidity (%): No data
- Air changes (per hr): No data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): No data
IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: No data - Route of administration:
- other: Micro-injection
- Vehicle:
- No data
- Details on exposure:
- No data
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- No data
- Frequency of treatment:
- No data
- Post exposure period:
- No data
- Remarks:
- 0.5-1.0 cubic mm
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 6 males
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Positive control(s):
- No data
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- X-chromosome
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- Other:
The lethals were detected by the usual C1B method:
(1) C1B/x-ple* female by + (treated) male
(2) F1 of C1B/+ female by x-ple male
(3) Females from cultures indicating lethal or semi-lethal mutations were mated by x-ple males. - Evaluation criteria:
- No data
- Statistics:
- No data
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- other: No mutagenic potential
- Additional information on results:
- No data
- Conclusions:
- The test chemical did not induce lethal mutations in X- chromosomes of Drosophila Oregon-R stock and is hence it is not likely to be mutagenic in vivo.
- Executive summary:
Drosophila lethal mutation assay was performed to determine the mutagenic nature of the test chemical in vivo. The study was performed using male Oregon-R stock Drosophila flies. The test chemical was injected into larvae by use of a micro-injectionfollowing the method of Beadle and Ephrussi.As per this method, 0.5-1.0 cubic mm od substance may be injected into each larva. The gonads were thus bathed in the solution. The treatment after injection of 0.038 per cent I2 in 0.075 per cent KI did not produce a significant increase in the lethal mutation rate of the X-chromosome. Based on the observations made, thetest chemical did not induce lethal mutations in X- chromosomes of Drosophila Oregon-R stock and is hence it is not likely to be mutagenic in vivo.
Reference
Table: Effect of various test chemical on the lethal mutation rate in the x-chromosome of the Oregon-R race of Drosophila Melanogater
Chemical |
Treatment |
Time |
No. of animals |
No, of chromosomes tested |
No. of lethals |
% lethals |
Location of lethals |
Mutation rate |
Test chemical |
Injection |
- |
6 |
386 |
2 |
0.52 |
- |
- |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Data available for the test chemical was reviewed to determine the mutagenic nature. The studies are as mentioned below:
Gene mutation in vitro:
Genotoxic effects of the test chemical was evaluated in vitro using the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay on CHO cells. The study was performed using CHO cells. The test chemical was dissolved in culture medum and used at dose level of 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5 and 10 mM. In preliminary cytotoxicity assays, CHO cells were exposed for 1 h to the test compound at concentrations ranging from 0.001 to 5 mg/ml. The cells were exposed for 3 h to concentrations of the test compounds of 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5 and 10 mM. Test compound and MMS (30 mg/ml) were dissolved the culture medium. Exponentially growing CHO-K1 cells were plated in a six-well plate on glass coverslips (1.5 X 105cells/well) and cultured 24 h prior to compound treatment. Duplicate coverslips were established for each experiment, and at least two independent experiments were performed. The cells were exposed to the chemicals at different concentrations for 3 h in a FCS free medium. At the end of treatment, cells were washed twice with PBS before a 20 h incubation in fresh medium containing 10% of FCS and 3 mg/ml of cytochalasin B. Thereafter, cells were washed twice with PBS and allowed to recover for 1.5 h in 10% FCS fresh medium. Cells were fixed with cold methanol, stained with acridine orange (62.5 mg/ml) for 5 min and mounted in Sorensen buffer. Slides were coded and blindly examined under an epifluorescence microscope at 1000X magnification under oil immersion. Briefly, the cells should be binucleated (BN) with an intact nuclear membrane and should be situated within the same cytoplasmic boundary. MN should be morphologically identical to but smaller than nuclei, their diameter usually varied between 1/6th and 1/3rd of the mean diameter of the main nuclei. MN should be readily distinguished and not be linked to the main nuclei via nucleoplasmic bridges. Cells showing chromatin condensation or nuclear fragmentation with an intact cytoplasmic membrane were classified as apoptotic cells. One thousand (1000) binucleated cells were scored for each slide. The frequencies of BN, of BN with MN (MNBN) and of apoptotic cells (AP) were estimated. MMS (30 mg/ml), a well known alkylating agent was used as positive control. Cytotoxicity was measured by the BN cell ratio between treated and control slides. Based on the observations made, the test chemical did not induce any increase in the frequency of MNBN cells for doses ranging from 0.625 to 10 mM in the micronucleus assay in the CHO cell line and hence it is not liekly to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
In the same study, genotoxic effects of the test chemical was evaluated in vitro using the alkaline comet assay using CHO cells. The test chemical was dissolved in culture medium and used at dose level of 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5 and 10 mM. Cells were collected by trypsination,suspended in prewarmed low melting point (LMP) agarose (0.5% in PBS) and deposited on a conventional microscope slide (initially dipped in 1% agarose and dried) precoated with normal agarose (0.8% in PBS). Slides were put in a lysis solution (2.5 M NaCl, 0.1 M EDTA, 10 mM Tris pH10, 10% DMSO and 1% Triton X 100) for 1 h at about 5 C. DNA was allowed to unwind in electrophoresis buffer (0.3 M NaOH, 1 mM EDTA, pH13.6) for 40 min at room temperature. Slides were then placed into a horizontal electrophoresis tank and exposed to 0.7 V/cm (300 mA) for 24 min. After electrophoresis, slides were washed twice in neutralization buffer (0.4 M Tris, pH7.5) and dehydrated in ethanol for 5 min. After staining with ethidium bromide, 50 randomly selected cells per slide were submitted to image analysis. Olive tail moment was used to evaluate the extent of DNA damage in individual cells. Median values of OTM were calculated without taking HDC into account. Each dose was tested in duplicate and at least two independent assays were performed. Etoposide (0.5 mg/ml), a well known inhibitor of topoisomerase II inducing DNA double strand breaks, was used as positive control. In parallel to the assessment of DNA damage, cell viability was measured using the Trypan blue exclusion method. Cell viability was expressed as proportion of total cells. No primary DNA damage was observed after cell exposure to the test chemical. The slight increase in tail moment observed for the 10 mM potassium iodate concentration was not statistically significant from control. The test chemical did not induce DNA damage in CHO cells when tested at concentrations up to 10 mM in alkaline comet assay and hence it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
Gene mutation in vivo:
Drosophila lethal mutation assay was performed to determine the mutagenic nature of the test chemical in vivo. The study was performed using male Oregon-R stock Drosophila flies. The test chemical was injected into larvae by use of a micro-injectionfollowing the method of Beadle and Ephrussi.As per this method, 0.5-1.0 cubic mm od substance may be injected into each larva. The gonads were thus bathed in the solution. The treatment after injection of 0.038 per cent I2 in 0.075 per cent KI did not produce a significant increase in the lethal mutation rate of the X-chromosome. Based on the observations made, thetest chemical did not induce lethal mutations in X- chromosomes of Drosophila Oregon-R stock and is hence it is not likely to be mutagenic in vivo.
In the same study, Drosophila lethal mutation assay was also performed to determine the mutagenic nature of the test chemical in vivo. The study was performed using male Oregon-R stock Drosophila flies. The chorion was removed from fertilized eggs by gently stroking with a blunt glass needle. They were then immersed in sub lethal 50% concentration of the test chemical. The eggs used for the second series of experiments were approximately from 2 to 4 hours old when treated. For the injection series larvae were grown in culture dishes rich in yeast, and larvae just prior to pupation were used. The treatment immersion in 50% test chemical solution did not produce a significant increase in the lethal mutation rate of the X-chromosome. Based on the observations made, thetest chemical did not induce lethal mutations in X- chromosomes of Drosophila Oregon-R stockand hence it is not likely to be mutagenic in vivo.
In vivo mammalian chromosome aberration study was performed in another experiment to determine the mutagenic nature of the test chemical. The study was performed using male and female Wistar, Long-Evans, and Gifu-agouti strain rats.The MTK-sarcoma III, an ascites tumor of rats, was employed exclusively for the experiment. All the animals in which the tumor was transplanted died within 9 days. The test compounds were administered intraperitoneally to rats in each experimental group, starting on the 3rd or 4th day of tumor transfer, at dosages determined after several trials. Rats of control group received intraperitoneal injection of physiological saline solution. Cytological preparations were made according to the acetic-dahlia squash technique at appropriate intervals following application of the chemicals. A part of the preparations were fixed with absolute methanol or with acetic acid-ethanol (3:1) and stained with May-Grunwald-Giemsa or with Feulgen's reagent. The tumor cells were observed for pycnotic aggregation of chromatin, karyorrhexis, multinucleate cells, chromosome clumping, contraction or stickiness of chromosomes, irregular chromosome distribution, lagging or bridges of chromosomes at anaphase, multipolar spindle formation, vacuolization or blebbing of cytoplasm, and disintegration of cytoplasm. Based on the observations made, the test chemical induced chromatid aggregation, stickiness of chromosomes and contraction of chromosomes in the tumor cells of male and femaleWistar, Long-Evans, and Gifu-agouti rats and is likely to be mutagenic in vivo.
Based on the observations made, the test chemical does not enhibit gene mutation in vitro and in vivo. Hence it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the observations made, the test chemical does not enhibit gene mutation in vitro and in vivo. Hence it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.