Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 814-283-0 | CAS number: 42220-47-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2017-03-31 to 2017-08
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 017
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 487 (In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 2016
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- recovery period and harvest time
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Commission Regulation (EC) No 640/2012 of 06 July 2012 amending, for the purpose of its adaptation to technical progress, Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008: In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test, No B.49; No L 193
- Version / remarks:
- 2012
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- recovery period and harvest time
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Deviation:
A series of in-house non-GLP validation experiments was performed to get distinct responses of statistical significance when using the specified positive controls. To achieve such response the test design, specifically for the treatment, the recovery phase and harvest time, was slightly modified comparing the current proposal given in the OECD Guideline 487. The optimum in responses was found with the time schedule stated in the Summary. - GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- (1-hydroxyethane-1,1-diyl)bis(phosphonic acid), compound with 2-aminoethanol (1:?)
- EC Number:
- 814-283-0
- Cas Number:
- 42220-47-3
- Molecular formula:
- C4 H13 N1 O7 P2
- IUPAC Name:
- (1-hydroxyethane-1,1-diyl)bis(phosphonic acid), compound with 2-aminoethanol (1:?)
- Reference substance name:
- Water
- EC Number:
- 231-791-2
- EC Name:
- Water
- Cas Number:
- 7732-18-5
- Molecular formula:
- H2O
- IUPAC Name:
- Dihydrogen oxide
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: 0013537161
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes:
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
- Source of cells: Blood samples were drawn from healthy non-smoking donors not receiving medication
- Suitability of cells: The lymphocytes of the respective donors have been shown to respond well to stimulation of proliferation with PHA and to positive control substances. All donors had a previously established low incidence of micronuclei in their peripheral blood lymphocytes.
- Sex, age and number of blood donors: female donor (30 years old) Experiment I; female donor (32 years old) Experiment IIA; male donor (23 years old) for Experiment IIB
- Whole blood was used
MEDIA USED
- Type and identity of media including CO2 concentration:
Blood cultures were established by preparing an 11 % mixture of whole blood in medium within 30 hrs after blood collection. The culture medium was Dulbecco's Modified Eagles Medium/Ham's F12 (DMEM/F12, mixture 1:1) already supplemented with 200 mM GlutaMAX™. Additionally, the medium was supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/mL/100 µg/mL), the mitogen PHA (3 µg/mL), 10 % FBS (fetal bovine serum), 10 mM HEPES and the anticoagulant heparin (125 U.S.P.-U/mL). All incubations were done at 37 °C with 5.5 % CO2 in humidified air.
- Properly maintained: yes
- Cytokinesis block (if used):
- Cytochalasin B
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbital/beta-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Without S9
Experiment I 26; 45.5; 79.6; 139; 244; 426; 746; 1306; 2286; 4000 µg/mL
Experiment II A 244; 426; 746; 1306; 2286; 4000 µg/mL
With S9
Experiment I 26; 45.5; 79.6; 139; 244; 426; 746; 1306; 2286; 4000 µg/mL
Experiment II A 244; 426; 746; 1306; 2286; 4000 µg/mL
Experiment II B 426; 746; 1306; 2286; 4000 µg/mL
Concentrations are based on preliminary cytotoxicity test - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle/solvent used: deionised water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: well solubility and non-toxic properties to the cell cultures.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- other: Demecolcin without S9, 100 ng/mL in deionised water
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: Exp I: 4 hrs; Exp IIA: without S9 20 hrs, with S9 4 hrs
- Expression time: 40 hrs
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 20 hrs
SPINDLE INHIBITOR: Cytochalasin B
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: At least 1000 binucleate cells per culture were scored
STAIN: Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
METHODS OF SLIDE PREPARATION AND STAINING TECHNIQUE USED: slides were prepared by dropping the cell suspension in fresh fixative onto a clean microscope slide
CRITERIA FOR MICRONUCLEUS IDENTIFICATION: according to Countryman and Heddle, 1976
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Cytokinesis-block proliferation index - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item can be classified as non-clastogenic and non-aneugenic if:
- the number of micronucleated cells in all evaluated dose groups is in the range of the historical laboratory control data and
- no statistically significant or concentration-related increase of the number of micronucleated cells is observed in comparison to the respective solvent control.
A test item can be classified as clastogenic and aneugenic if:
- the number of micronucleated cells is not in the range of the historical laboratory control data and
- either a concentration-related increase in three test groups or a statistically significant increase in the number of micronucleated cells is observed. - Statistics:
- Statistical significance was confirmed by the Chi square test (α < 0.05), using a validated test script of “R”, a language and environment for statistical computing and graphics. Within this test script a statistical analysis was conducted for those values that indicated an increase in the number of cells with micronuclei compared to the concurrent solvent control.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: human
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: none
- Effects of osmolality: none
- Evaporation from medium: no
- Water solubility: well soluble
- Precipitation: not observed
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: yes
HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: please refer to "any other information on result incl. tables"
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
- Measurement of cytotoxicity used: CBPI
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1. Summary of results
Exp. |
Preparation |
Test item |
Proliferation |
Cytostasis |
Micronucleated |
|
interval |
concentration |
index |
in %* |
cells |
|
|
in µg/mL |
CBPI |
|
in %** |
Exposure period 4 hrs without S9 mix |
|||||
I |
40 hrs |
Solvent control1 |
1.68 |
|
0.95 |
|
|
Positive control2 |
1.40 |
41.5 |
14.45S |
|
|
1306 |
1.88 |
n.c. |
0.30 |
|
|
2286 |
1.81 |
n.c. |
0.60 |
|
|
4000 |
1.85 |
n.c. |
0.55 |
Exposure period 20 hrs without S9 mix |
|||||
IIA |
40 hrs |
Solvent control1 |
1.90 |
|
0.20 |
|
|
Positive control3 |
1.48 |
47.0 |
4.15S |
|
|
1306 |
1.87 |
2.8 |
0.45 |
|
|
2286 |
1.82 |
9.0 |
0.25 |
|
|
4000 |
1.68 |
23.9 |
0.40 |
Exposure period 4 hrs with S9 mix |
|||||
I |
40 hrs |
Solvent control1 |
2.05 |
|
0.75 |
|
|
Positive control4 |
1.47 |
55.0 |
9.35S |
|
|
1306# |
1.96 |
8.9 |
1.38S |
|
|
2286 |
2.03 |
2.6 |
0.95 |
|
|
4000 |
1.99 |
5.7 |
0.55 |
IIB |
40 hrs |
Solvent control1 |
2.11 |
|
0.40 |
|
|
Positive control5 |
1.80 |
28.0 |
9.30S |
|
|
1306 |
2.09 |
1.2 |
0.50 |
|
|
2286 |
2.15 |
n.c. |
0.50 |
|
|
4000# |
2.01 |
9.1 |
0.78 |
*For the positive control groups and the test item treatment groups the values are related to the solvent controls
** The number of micronucleated cells was determined in a sample of 2000 binucleated cells
# The number of micronucleated cells was determined in a sample of 4000 binucleated cells
S The number of micronucleated cells is statistically significantly higher than corresponding control values
n.c. Not calculated as the CBPI is equal or higher than the solvent control value
1 Deion.
water10.0 % (v/v)
2 MMC 0.8
µg/mL
3 Demecolcin 100 ng/mL
4 CPA 17.5 µg/mL
5 CPA 15.0 µg/mL
Table 2 Historical control data Solvent control and Positive control
Solvent Control without S9 |
||
Micronucleated cells in % |
||
|
Pulse treatment (4/40) |
Continuous treatment (20/40) |
No. of experiments |
78* |
79** |
Mean |
0.60 |
0.57 |
95 % Ctrl limit |
0.08 – 1.12 |
0.12 – 1.03 |
1x SD |
0.26 |
0.23 |
Min – Max |
0.15 – 1.65 |
0.05 – 1.35 |
Solvent Control with S9 |
|
Micronucleated cells in % |
|
|
Pulse treatment (4/40) |
No. of experiments |
96* |
Mean |
0.62 |
95 % Ctrl limit |
0.16 – 1.08 |
1x SD |
0.23 |
Min – Max |
0.15 – 1.30 |
Positive Control without S9 |
||
Micronucleated cells in % |
||
|
Pulse treatment (4/40) |
Continuous treatment (20/40) |
MMC |
Demecolcin |
|
No. of experiments |
78 |
81 |
Mean |
12.48 |
3.72 |
95 % Ctrl limit |
1.44 – 23.52 |
1.43 – 6.01 |
1x SD |
5.52 |
1.15 |
Min – Max |
4.15 – 30.30 |
2.10 – 7.25 |
Positive Control with S9 |
|
Micronucleated cells in % |
|
|
Pulse treatment (4/40) |
CPA |
|
No. of experiments |
165 |
Mean |
5.16 |
95 % Ctrl limit |
0.84 – 9.49 |
1x SD |
2.16 |
Min – Max |
2.10 – 11.90 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
