Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to microorganisms

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
activated sludge respiration inhibition testing
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2019
Report date:
2019

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 209 (Activated Sludge, Respiration Inhibition Test (Carbon and Ammonium Oxidation))
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
(E)-anethole
EC Number:
224-052-0
EC Name:
(E)-anethole
Cas Number:
4180-23-8
Molecular formula:
C10H12O
IUPAC Name:
1-methoxy-4-prop-1-en-1-ylbenzene
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
4-allylanisole
EC Number:
205-427-8
EC Name:
4-allylanisole
Cas Number:
140-67-0
Molecular formula:
C10H12O
IUPAC Name:
1-allyl-4-methoxybenzene
1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Caryophyllene
EC Number:
201-746-1
EC Name:
Caryophyllene
Cas Number:
87-44-5
Molecular formula:
C15H24
IUPAC Name:
4,11,11-trimethyl-8-methylenebicyclo[7.2.0]undec-4-ene
Constituent 3
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2,6-dimethyl-6-(4-methyl-3-pentenyl)bicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene
EC Number:
241-702-9
EC Name:
2,6-dimethyl-6-(4-methyl-3-pentenyl)bicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene
Cas Number:
17699-05-7
Molecular formula:
C15H24
IUPAC Name:
2,6-dimethyl-6-(4-methylpent-3-en-1-yl)bicyclo[3.1.1]hept-2-ene
Test material form:
liquid

Sampling and analysis

Details on sampling:
Test substance information

Test item: Essential Oil of Star Anise Oil (Illicium verum)
Common name of the active ingredient (a.i.) UVCB substance (1)
Received on: 17/May/2018
Bioagri code: QUIM-0014/18
Analyzed Concentration of a.i. (Bioagri): 96.32% (w/w)
Analysis Certificate (CA): CA TH – 0461/17 R1
Batch number: 18-02-10-1 (1)
Test Substance sent by: Jinxi County Purong Essences Mfg Co., Ltd (1)
Manufacturer: Jinxi County Purong Essences Mfg Co., Ltd (1)
Address: JiangXi Jinxi County Industrial Park Area C (1)
Physical state: Light yellow clarified liquid or crystal (1)
Manufacture Date: 10/Feb/2018 (1)
Validity Date: 09/Aug/2019 (1)
Source: (1) Information provided by the sponsor.

Test solutions

Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
Water Milli-Q
Sodium 1-heptanesulfonate 99%
Methanol 99.9%
Bacteriological Peptone
Meat Extract
Urea 99%
Sodium Chloride 99%
Calcium chloride 98%
Magnesium Sulfate 98%
Potassium phosphate 98%
Deionized water
Copper sulphate penta hydrate 98.22%
Water without chlorine

Test organisms

Test organisms (species):
activated sludge of a predominantly industrial sewage
Details on inoculum:

All chemicals used in the test were “analytical grade” or “for use in microbiology”.
Composition of nutrient solution (synthetic sewage):

Peptone 16.0 g
Beef extract 11.0 g
Urea 3.0 g
NaCl 0.7 g
CaCl2 *2H2O 0.4 g
MgSO4 *7H2O 0.2 g
K2HPO4 2.8 g
Deionised water 1000 mL

The pH of the solutions was 7.52. The medium was prepared and stored in the dark at a temperature of 4°C.

Study design

Water media type:
freshwater
Total exposure duration:
3 h

Test conditions

Test temperature:
20±2℃
pH:
7.52
Nominal and measured concentrations:
One replicate/treatment (positive control)
One replicate for concentration (10 mg L-1)
One replicate for concentration (100 mg L-1)
Three replicates for concentration (1000 mg L-1)
Details on test conditions:
The study was performed in a closed system with aeration. In the control vessels, 16 mL of nutrient solution was mixed with 234 mL of water. The positive control and the test vessels were prepared by adding the appropriate amount of positive control solution respectively test item into the test vessel, adding 16 mL nutrient solution and water to give 250 mL. Then, 250 mL inoculum was added in ten minutes intervals. After addition of the inoculums, the flasks were closed immediately and the mixtures were stirred with aeration.
After three hours the contents were poured into a tube of approximately 50 mL and the respiration rate was determined by measuring the O2 concentration over a ten minutes period. The following vials were measured equally at ten minutes intervals.
Reference substance (positive control):
yes
Remarks:
copper sulfate pent hydrate

Results and discussion

Effect concentrations
Key result
Duration:
3 h
Remarks on result:
other: there were no statistically significant toxic effects at the highest concentration (1000 mg L-1)
Details on results:
The test substance was solubilized in water because of its solubility. As there were no statistically significant toxic effects at the highest concentration (1000 mg L-1), no further testing was required at higher or lower concentrations as outlined in OECD 209, 2010.
Results with reference substance (positive control):
Variation in O2-Consumption of the Controls

Average oxygen uptake rate was 66.50 mg L-1 h. The variation of OD consumption in the controls was 15.71% which are far below the recommended upper limit of 30%.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 6. O2-Consumption, Inhibition - test substance.

 

Test Concentration

pH

Consumption (mg L-1h)

Inhibition (%)

Variation in DO consumption of controls (%)

Control C1

7.65

56.05

-

15.71

F1 – 1%

8.01

66.50

0.00

F2 – 10%

7.83

70.30

0.00

F3 – 100%

8.00

66.50

0.00

F3 – 100%

8.00

61.75

0.00

F3 – 100%

7.89

67.45

0.00

Abiotic control

7.24

0.00

-

Control C2

8.01

66.50

-

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
As there were no statistically significant toxic effects at the highest concentration (1000 mg L-1), no further testing was required at higher or lower concentrations as outlined in OECD 209, 2010.