Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP- and Guideline-Study with no or minor deficiencies.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2004

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
methyl 2-amino-5-fluorobenzoate
EC Number:
608-681-1
Cas Number:
319-24-4
Molecular formula:
C8 H8 F N O2
IUPAC Name:
methyl 2-amino-5-fluorobenzoate

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White

Test system

Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
other: Polyethylenglycol 400
Amount / concentration applied:
0.5 g of the test item pasted with 0.1 ml PEG 400.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 h
Observation period:
72 h
Number of animals:
3

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 0-72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 0-72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 0-72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4

Any other information on results incl. tables

No signs of irritation occured during the whole study.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU