Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
03 Feb - 07 Feb 1992
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Basic data given. Lack of study details, occlusive exposure.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1992
Report date:
1992

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
lack of study details, occlusive exposure
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Glycerides, mixed C8-10 and succinyl
EC Number:
294-620-0
EC Name:
Glycerides, mixed C8-10 and succinyl
Cas Number:
91744-56-8
Molecular formula:
Not applicable: Complex UVCB substance
IUPAC Name:
Glycerides, mixed C8-10 (even numbered) and succinyl
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): only trade name given
- Physical state: transparent liquid
- Analytical purity: no data
- Other: Density: 0.98 g/mL

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: New Zealand
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 2.044 kg (mean)

Test system

Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: untreated sites of the same animal served as control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 0.5 mL
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 h
Observation period:
72 h
reading time points: 1, 24, 48 and 72 h
Number of animals:
3 males
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Type of wrap if used: the treated skin was covered with a patch and held in place with an occlusive dressing.

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of 3 animals
Time point:
other: mean after 24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: reversibility: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of 3 animals
Time point:
other: mean after 24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: reversibility: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
/Mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other:
Remarks:
reversibility: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Remarks:
/Mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: reversibility: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #3
Remarks:
/Mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other:
Remarks:
reversibility: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
/Mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other:
Remarks:
reversibility: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #2
Remarks:
/Mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other:
Remarks:
reversibility: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #3
Remarks:
/Mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other:
Remarks:
reversibility: not applicable
Irritant / corrosive response data:
No local irritating effects were observed during the study period.
Other effects:
No further local or systemic effects were reported.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified