Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
hydrolysis
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP study according to guidelines

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2013
Report date:
2013

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 111 (Hydrolysis as a Function of pH)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
The test was performed at one temperature and pH value only (tier 2) and no identification of hydrolysis products was attempted.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.7 (Degradation: Abiotic Degradation: Hydrolysis as a Function of pH)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
(1-phenylethyl)-phenyloxymethyloxirane
IUPAC Name:
(1-phenylethyl)-phenyloxymethyloxirane
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Phenol, styrenated, epoxidized
EC Number:
935-721-8
Molecular formula:
not applicable
IUPAC Name:
Phenol, styrenated, epoxidized
Test material form:
other: yellow liquid
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): LR 600, (1-phenylethyl)-phenyloxymethyloxirane
- Molecular formula (if other than submission substance):
- Molecular weight (if other than submission substance): mixture
- Smiles notation (if other than submission substance):
- InChl (if other than submission substance):
- Structural formula attached as image file (if other than submission substance): see Fig.
- Substance type: organic
- Physical state: liquid
- Analytical purity:
- Impurities (identity and concentrations):
- Composition of test material, percentage of components:
- Isomers composition:
- Purity test date:
- Lot/batch No.:
- Expiration date of the lot/batch:
- Radiochemical purity (if radiolabelling):
- Specific activity (if radiolabelling):
- Locations of the label (if radiolabelling):
- Expiration date of radiochemical substance (if radiolabelling):
- Stability under test conditions:
- Storage condition of test material: The test item was kept at room temperature: (20 ± 5 °C); in a tightly closed vessel in the dark
- Other:
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Details on properties of test surrogate or analogue material (migrated information):
PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
- Vapour pressure:
- Water solubility: H2O: approx. 10 mg/L (see LAUS Study No. 12060103G910, 22 Nov. 2012)
- log Pow: 4.0 / 4.0 / 5.8 (3 main components: see LAUS Study No.12060103G930, 19 Oct. 2012)
- pKa:
- Base or acid catalysis of test material:
- UV absorption:
- Stability of test material at room temperature:

OTHER PROPERTIES (if relevant for this endpoint)
Radiolabelling:
no

Study design

Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
20 mL of a solution in medium was extracted with 2 mL iso-octane and the upper phase was measured via GC/FID. Tenfold enrichment was achieved.
On days 11, 15 and 21, 50 mL of a solution in medium was extracted with 2 mL iso-octane and the upper phase was measured via GC/FID. 25-fold
enrichment was achieved.
Buffers:
- For the preparation of the solution of the test item and of the buffer solutions deionised water was used.
- Buffer compositions were taken from the annex of the OECD method (buffer solutions 7 and 9) or Küster et al. (buffer solution 4).
- pH: 4.0, 7.0, and 9.0 (adjusted to the nominal pH value ± 0.02 units)
- Buffer solutions were filtrated (0.2 µm) after preparation, resulting in sterile solutions.
Duration of testopen allclose all
Duration:
5 d
Duration:
21 d
pH:
7
Number of replicates:
Tier 1: 3 replicates per pH
Tier 2: 18 (two replicates per sampling point)
Positive controls:
not specified
Negative controls:
not specified

Results and discussion

Transformation products:
not measured
Total recovery of test substance (in %)open allclose all
% Recovery:
< 10
pH:
4
Temp.:
50 °C
Duration:
5 d
% Recovery:
< 10
pH:
7
Temp.:
50 °C
Duration:
5 d
% Recovery:
< 10
pH:
9
Temp.:
50 °C
Duration:
5 d
% Recovery:
21.9
pH:
7
Temp.:
25 °C
Duration:
ca. 21 d
Dissipation DT50 of parent compoundopen allclose all
pH:
7
Temp.:
25 °C
Hydrolysis rate constant:
0.091 d-1
DT50:
ca. 9.5 d
Type:
(pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
Remarks on result:
other: Values resulting from area sum of the two main components
pH:
7
Temp.:
25 °C
Hydrolysis rate constant:
0.046 d-1
DT50:
ca. 15 d
Type:
(pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
Remarks on result:
other: Component 1
pH:
7
Temp.:
25 °C
Hydrolysis rate constant:
0.101 d-1
DT50:
ca. 7 d
Type:
(pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
Remarks on result:
other: Component 2
Other kinetic parameters:
see table below
Details on results:
TEST CONDITIONS
- pH, sterility, temperature, and other experimental conditions maintained throughout the study: Yes

PATHWAYS OF HYDROLYSIS: not analysed

Any other information on results incl. tables

The tables below are excerpted from the original report

Tier 1: Measured Concentrations

Parameter

pH 4.0

pH 7.0

pH 9.0

Area Sum Mean 0 h

311.07

280.25

289.22

Area blank

-

-

-

Area Sum 120 h Mean

- not evaluable 

Area 120 h blank

not measured

-

-

Residue

< 10 %

< 10 %

< 10 %

 

Tier 2: Area Sum on Day 0 at pH 7 and 25 °C

Sampling Time [h]

Replicate 1

Replicate 2

Replicate 3

Analysis 1 [pA*s]

Analysis 2 [pA*s]

Analysis 1 [pA*s]

Analysis 2 [pA*s]

Analysis 1 [pA*s]

Analysis 2 [pA*s]

0

244.65

237.31

245.88

249.29

240.34

237.61

Sampling Time [h]

Replicate 1

Replicate 2

Analysis 1 [pA*s]

Analysis 2 [pA*s]

Analysis 1 [pA*s]

Analysis 2

[pA*s]

24.05

218.50

212.43

211.61

217.12

48.07

176.27

168.41

173.26

179.41

66.35

156.20

159.65

156.34

163.57

90.22

123.85

142.80

144.52

140.36

162.75

97.61

105.76

99.48

104.35

258.30*

161.64

168.10

171.80

179.17

354.30

118.80

122.39

117.42

114.18

501.02

58.29

60.04

63.84

63.53

*from day 11 (258.30 h) on 25fold enrichment was used, instead of 10fold.

The area ratio (FID-peaks) of two main components in the test item changed during the test: from 36 : 64 to 65 : 35.

That implies that the hydrolysis of the second component had taken place faster than hydrolysis of the first component.

From the area ratio of two main components following kinetic parameters were determined for each constituent (excerpt from original report):

Parameter

Value Component 1

Value Component 2

kobs(25°C; pH 7.0)

0.001933 h-1

0.004189 h-1

t1/2(25°C; pH 7.0)

358.6 h

165.5 h

t1/2(25°C; pH 7.0)

14.94 d

6.89 d

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
Tier 1: After five days (120 hours), the areas of the test item were lower than 10% of the start area at all three pH values.
The test item can be considered as hydrolytically instable at all pH values.
Tier 2:Temperature dependency and acid/base catalysis of the hydrolysis constants was not determinable as the test was performed at one single temperature ( 25 °C) and one pH value pH 7) only.