Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
17 Jan - 17 Aug 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018
Report date:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
adopted: 21 Jul 1997
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Remarks:
Landesamt für Umwelt, Wasserwirtschaft und Gewerbeaufsicht, Mainz, Germany
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Dodecanoic acid, ester with 1,2,3-propanetriol
Cas Number:
37318-95-9
Molecular formula:
C12 mono: C15H30O4 C12 di: C27H52O5 C12 tri: C39H74O6
IUPAC Name:
Dodecanoic acid, ester with 1,2,3-propanetriol

Method

Target gene:
his operon
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
other: TA1535, TA102, TA100, TA98 and TA97a
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with 500 mg Aroclor 1254/kg body weight intra-peritoneally
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Dose-range-finding experiments
Experiment 1c:
50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation
Experiment 1d:
0.05, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5 and 15 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation

Main experiments
Experiment 1e:
0.05, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5 and 15 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation
Experiment 2b:
0.23, 0.47, 0.94, 1.88, 3.75, 7.5 and 15 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation

Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The solvent was chosen because of the solubility of the test substance in the vehicle and the relative nontoxicity of the vehicle to the bacteria evaluated in a pre-experiment.
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
demineralised water, DMSO and ethanol (including solvents for positive controls)
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
sodium azide
benzo(a)pyrene
other: see below
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
Experiments 1a, 1b and 2a were declared invalid and were therefore not reported here.

METHOD OF APPLICATION: Experiment 1e: in agar (plate incorporation); Experiment 2b: preincubation

DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 min
- Exposure duration: 48 h

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 replications per experiment

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: reduction in the number of spontaneous revertants and reduction in bacterial background lawn
Evaluation criteria:
A substance is considered to have mutagenic potential, if a reproducible increase of revertant colonies per plate exceeding an increase factor of 2 in at least one strain can be observed. A concentration-related increase over the range tested is also taken as a sign of mutagenic activity.
Statistics:
Mean values and standard deviation were calculated.

Results and discussion

Test results
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium, other: TA97a, TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
Exp 1e and 2b: at 15 µg/plate in all strains +/- S9
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: No precipitation of the test item was observed up to 5000 µg/plate

RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: In the dose range finding studies cytotoxicity was observed in all strains from 15 µg/plate.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1. Mean revertants Experiment 1e

Strain

TA97a

TA98

TA100

TA102

TA1535

Induction

-S9

+S9

-S9

+S9

-S9

+S9

-S9

+S9

-S9

+S9

Demin. water

Mean

83

69

52

50

82

102

356

345

24

22

sd

6.7

5

5.2

10.7

20.6

18.5

62.9

72.6

8

7.5

DMSO

Mean

85

78

43

39

110

101

257

324

21

21

sd

5.6

13.6

5.5

11.9

6

21.2

26.6

20.8

0.6

5.3

Ethanol

Mean

78

70

47

39

107

127

292

258

23

22

sd

11

5.9

3.8

10.7

6.4

3.1

58.9

24

3.6

3.1

Positive

Mean

343

657

560

487

404

1001

689

1083

265

132

Controls*

sd

35.9

24.1

146

123.3

17.4

0

60.2

400

59.5

15.2

 

f(I)

4.04

8.42

13.02

12.49

4.93

9.91

2.68

3.34

11.04

6.29

15 µg/plate

Mean

14

21

2

4

22

17

165

149

1

2

sd

6

7.2

1.2

1.7

9

4

16.8

20.2

0

1.2

f(I)

0.18

0.3

0.04

0.1

0.21

0.13

0.57

0.58

0.04

0.09

5 µg/plate

Mean

116

68

26

37

97

86

311

387

16

21

sd

15.6

15.7

3.5

13.7

13.5

10

49.4

31.1

4.4

1.7

f(I)

1.49

0.97

0.55

0.95

0.91

0.68

1.07

1.5

0.7

0.95

1.5 µg/plate

Mean

84

90

32

43

104

97

309

356

25

19

sd

2.1

18.7

8.1

11.4

26.5

8.1

32.6

69.3

4.4

2.9

f(I)

1.08

1.29

0.68

1.1

0.97

0.76

1.06

1.38

1.09

0.86

0.5 µg/plate

Mean

82

83

30

37

94

93

360

432

18

22

sd

12.1

25.2

9.6

6.8

9.1

14.7

34.2

52.5

2.6

1.2

f(I)

1.05

1.19

0.64

0.95

0.88

0.73

1.23

1.67

0.78

1

0.15 µg/plate

Mean

76

86

28

40

103

92

312

259

22

22

sd

11.9

4.4

1.5

3.2

18

10.4

60.5

78.2

3.8

3.5

f(I)

0.97

1.23

0.6

1.03

0.96

0.72

1.07

1

0.96

1

0.05 µg/plate

Mean

79

95

27

38

103

123

337

305

25

21

sd

25.7

21.7

6.7

10

33.8

5.8

14

98

5.6

4

f(I)

1.01

1.36

0.57

0.97

0.96

0.97

1.15

1.18

1.09

0.95

 f(I) = increase factor

* Different positive controls were used

Table 2. Mean revertants Experiment 2b

Strain

TA97a

TA98

TA100

TA102

TA1535

Induction

-S9

+S9

-S9

+S9

-S9

+S9

-S9

+S9

-S9

+S9

Demin. water

Mean

83

91

33

36

88

100

289

348

17

19

sd

8.7

5.6

5.3

5

3

15

12.2

25

6.8

3.8

DMSO

Mean

96

89

30

39

99

98

336

295

18

15

sd

13.9

18.7

4.4

2.1

16.3

9.2

32.7

73.2

1.7

3.2

Ethanol

Mean

73

103

37

37

83

95

280

316

15

15

sd

2.6

7

10.2

7.6

10.4

15

62.9

63.5

3.6

4.2

Positive

Mean

338

533

493

260

579

897

1235

1251

457

157

Controls*

sd

31

50.3

188.7

10.6

83.3

180.7

364.5

226.9

55.5

9.2

 

f(I)

3.52

5.99

16.43

6.67

6.58

9.15

3.68

4.24

26.88

10.47

15 µg/plate

Mean

10

3

1

2

3

2

18

63

3

2

sd

1.7

1.5

0

1

0

1

1.2

20.3

4

1.2

f(I)

0.14

0.03

0.03

0.05

0.04

0.02

0.06

0.2

0.2

0.13

7.5 µg/plate

Mean

83

82

32

36

83

98

243

273

16

21

sd

5.8

20.5

4.4

1.2

5.8

10.5

20.5

45.1

4.4

1.5

f(I)

1.14

0.8

0.86

0.97

1

1.03

0.87

0.86

1.07

1.4

3.75 µg/plate

Mean

94

85

30

32

81

100

247

275

15

14

sd

6.7

4.2

6.1

7.8

7.8

3.1

46.4

74.6

2.1

1.5

f(I)

1.29

0.83

0.81

0.86

0.98

1.05

0.88

0.87

1

0.93

1.88 µg/plate

Mean

78

91

32

31

92

102

335

224

14

18

sd

10.4

12.1

1.7

4.6

9.2

6.1

8.3

2

4.6

4

f(I)

1.07

0.88

0.86

0.84

1.11

1.07

1.2

0.71

0.93

1.2

0.94 µg/plate

Mean

95

99

30

44

85

90

223

244

16

10

sd

11

11.1

8.3

10.1

13.8

8.5

62

10.6

2.5

0.6

f(I)

1.3

0.96

0.81

1.19

1.02

0.95

0.8

0.77

1.07

0.67

0.47 µg/plate

Mean

107

110

36

33

82

95

205

239

18

12

sd

4.6

17.1

4

4.7

6.9

11.4

36.3

84.3

1

1.7

f(I)

1.47

1.07

0.97

0.89

0.99

1

0.73

0.76

1.2

0.8

0.23 µg/plate

Mean

89

76

31

36

85

88

209

249

14

11

sd

15

12.5

6

6.2

14

15.3

48.1

14

2

1

f(I)

1.22

0.74

0.84

0.97

1.02

0.93

0.75

0.79

0.93

0.73

 f(I) = increase factor

* Different positive controls were used

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the Ames test the substance was not mutagenic in any of the five bacterial strains (TA1535, TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA97a) tested with and without metabolic activation.