Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Particle size distribution (Granulometry)

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
particle size distribution (granulometry)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2009-10-20 to 2010-02-05
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP study conducted according to current accepted guidelines
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 110 (Particle Size Distribution / Fibre Length and Diameter Distributions)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
In compliance with UK GLP standards (Schedule 1, Good Laboratory Practice Regulations 1999 (SI 1999/3106 as amended by SI 2004/0994)).
Type of method:
cascade impaction
Type of particle tested:
primary particle
Type of distribution:
volumetric distribution
Remarks on result:
not determinable
Remarks:
Too few particles were of a size less than 10.0 µm to allow accurate assessment of the mass median aerodynamic diameter.(migrated from fields under 'Mass median diameter' as D50 percentile. No source field for Standard deviation.)
No.:
#1
Size:
< 10 µm
Distribution:
2.5 %
No.:
#2
Size:
< 10 µm
Distribution:
2.74 %
No.:
#3
Size:
< 10 µm
Distribution:
2.51 %
No.:
#1
Size:
< 5.5 µm
Distribution:
0.816 %
No.:
#2
Size:
< 5.5 µm
Distribution:
1.11 %
No.:
#3
Size:
< 5.5 µm
Distribution:
0.998 %
No.:
#1
Size:
< 100 µm
Distribution:
97.6 %
Remarks on result:
other: Screening test

Table 2: Results from the screening test (sieve method)

Measurement

Result

Mass of test material transferred to sieve

11.44 g

Mass of test material passed through sieve

11.16 g

Proportion of test material <100 µm

97.6%

Table 3: Results of the cascade impactor method – Determination 1 (definitive test)

Collection Stage

ParticleCollected (µm)

Masses (g)

Pre-sampling

Post-sampling

Difference

Cup 1

>10.0

86.3255

88.7758

2.4503

Cup 2

5.5 to 10.0

85.6522

85.6968

0.0446

Cup 3

2.4 to 5.5

86.0985

86.1089

0.0104

Cup 4

1.61 to 2.4

85.8119

85.8179

0.0060

Cup 5

0.307 to 1.61

85.9589

85.9624

0.0035

Filter

<0.307

74.7968

74.7985

0.0017

Mass of test material found in artificial throat: 0.13 g. Total mass of test material recovered from artificial throat, sample cups and filter: 2.6465 g.

Table 4: Results of the cascade impactor method – Determination 2 (definitive test)

Collection Stage

ParticleCollected (µm)

Masses (g)

Pre-sampling

Post-sampling

Difference

Cup 1

>10.0

86.3249

88.7413

2.4164

Cup 2

5.5 to 10.0

85.6521

85.6962

0.0441

Cup 3

2.4 to 5.5

86.0984

86.1090

0.0106

Cup 4

1.61 to 2.4

85.8124

85.8185

0.0061

Cup 5

0.307 to 1.61

85.9611

85.9721

0.0110

Filter

<0.307

74.7965

74.7989

0.0024

Mass of test material found in artificial throat: 0.22 g. Total mass of test material recovered from artificial throat, sample cups and filter: 2.7106 g.

Table 5: Results of the cascade impactor method – Determination 3 (definitive test)

Collection Stage

ParticleCollected (µm)

Masses (g)

Pre-sampling

Post-sampling

Difference

Cup 1

>10.0

86.3265

88.7637

2.4372

Cup 2

5.5 to 10.0

85.6541

85.6960

0.0419

Cup 3

2.4 to 5.5

86.0997

86.1092

0.0095

Cup 4

1.61 to 2.4

85.8129

85.8189

0.0060

Cup 5

0.307 to 1.61

85.9613

85.9722

0.0109

Filter

<0.307

74.7989

74.8002

0.0013

Mass of test material found in artificial throat: 0.27 g. Total mass of test material recovered from artificial throat, sample cups and filter: 2.7768 g.

Table 6: Cumulative amounts of test material found in the three determinations for the individual particle size cut-points (µm)

Particle Size Cut-point (µm)

Cumulative Mass (g)

Cumulative Percentage (%)

Determination 1

Determination 2

Determination 3

Determination 1

Determination 2

Determination 3

10.0

0.0662

0.0742

0.0696

2.50

2.74

2.51

5.5

0.0216

0.0301

0.0277

0.816

1.11

0.998

2.4

0.0112

0.0195

0.0182

0.423

0.719

0.655

1.61

0.0052

0.0134

0.0122

0.196

0.494

0.439

0.307

0.0017

0.0024

0.0013

6.42 x 10-2

8.85 x 10-2

4.68 x 10-2

Conclusions:
97.6 % of the particles were < 100 µm (inhalable) from the sieve method, 2.58 % were < 10.0 µm (thoracic) from the cascade impactor results and 0.975% were <5.5 µm (respirable) also from the cascade impactor results.

Description of key information

The particle size of 6-aminopenicillanic acid was determined by the OECD method 110 in the study by Fox and White 2010.

Additional information

97.6 % of the particles were < 100 µm (inhalable) from the sieve method, 2.58 % were < 10.0 µm (thoracic) from the cascade impactor results and 0.975% were <5.5 µm (respirable) also from the cascade impactor results.