Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vivo

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vivo insect germ cell study: gene mutation
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study; No data regarding GLP

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1991
Report date:
1991
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1992
Report date:
1992

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Method: other: Zimmering et al (1985)
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of assay:
Drosophila SLRL assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Resorcinol
EC Number:
203-585-2
EC Name:
Resorcinol
Cas Number:
108-46-3
Molecular formula:
C6H6O2
IUPAC Name:
resorcinol

Test animals

Species:
Drosophila melanogaster
Strain:
other: Canton-s wild type
Sex:
male

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
other: feed (diet)
Duration of treatment / exposure:
72 hours
Doses / concentrations
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
11,000 ppm
Basis:

Results and discussion

Test results
Key result
Sex:
male
Genotoxicity:
negative
Toxicity:
yes
Remarks:
Lethality measured as part of the test protocol

Any other information on results incl. tables

Resorcinol (11,000 ppm) was negative for induction of sex-linked recessive lethal mutations in germ cells of male Drosophila melangaster when administered to adult flies by feeding.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative