Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2012
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP and OECD guidleine compliant study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2012
Report date:
2012

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
mammalian cell gene mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Copper, [29H,31H-phthalocyaninato(2-)-N29,N30,N31,N32]-, [[3-(1-methylethoxy)propyl]amino]sulfonyl derivs.
EC Number:
279-767-0
EC Name:
Copper, [29H,31H-phthalocyaninato(2-)-N29,N30,N31,N32]-, [[3-(1-methylethoxy)propyl]amino]sulfonyl derivs.
Cas Number:
81457-65-0
Molecular formula:
Unspecified
IUPAC Name:
Copper, [29H,31H-phthalocyaninato(2-)-N29,N30,N31,N32]-, [[3-(1-methylethoxy)propyl]amino]sulfonyl derivs.
Details on test material:
- Name of test identity (as cited in study report): 81457-65-0

- Substance type: Solid, blue
- Physical state: solid
- Analytical purity:

- Purity test date:
- Lot/batch No.: 110075
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 12 April 2014

- Stability under test conditions: stable
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature

Method

Target gene:
hgprt
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
Before freezing, the level of spontaneous mutants was depressed by treatment with HAT.
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Phenobarbital/beta-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
19.5 to 2500 µg/mL
Vehicle / solvent:
DMSO
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: ethylmethane sulfonate and 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium

DURATION
- Preincubation period: 24h
- Exposure duration: 4h and 24h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 3-4 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 7 days
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 19 days

SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 6-thioguanine


DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency

Evaluation criteria:
A test item is classified as positive if it induces either a concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency or a reproducible and positive response at one of the test points.
A test item producing neither a concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency nor a reproducible positive response at any of the test points is considered non-muta¬genic in this system.
A positive response is described as follows:
A test item is classified as mutagenic if it reproducibly induces a mutation frequency that is three times above the spontaneous mutation fre¬quency at least at one of the concen¬trations in the experiment.
The test item is classified as mutagenic if there is a reproducible concentration-related increase of the mutation frequency. Such evaluation may be considered also in the case that a threefold increase of the mutant frequency is not observed.
However, in a case by case evaluation this decision depends on the level of the correspon¬ding solvent control data. If there is by chance a low spontaneous mutation rate within the laboratory´s historical control data range, a concentration-related increase of the mutations within this range has to be discussed. The variability of the mutation rates of solvent controls within all experiments of this study was also taken into consideration
Statistics:
A linear regression (least squares) was performed to assess a possible dose dependent increase of mutant frequencies. The number of mutant colonies obtained for the groups treated with the test item were compared to the solvent control groups. A trend is judged as significant whenever the p-value (probability value) is below 0.05.

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
The highest concentration applied in the pre-experiment (2500.0 µg/mL) was limited by the solubility properties of the test item in DMSO and aqueous medium. The concentration range of the main experiments was limited by precipitation of the test item.
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative