Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Between 21 September 2011 and 12 October 2011
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results. The study report was conclusive, done to a valid guideline and the study was conducted under GLP conditions.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2012
Report date:
2012

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.3 (Acute Toxicity (Dermal))
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.1200 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF), Testing Guidelines for Toxicology Studies, 12 NohSan No. 8147, amended 26 June 2001
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare, 1992
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Phosphoric acid, mono- and di-C6-10-alkyl esters
EC Number:
269-616-7
EC Name:
Phosphoric acid, mono- and di-C6-10-alkyl esters
Cas Number:
68307-94-8
Molecular formula:
Not applicable (a generic molecular formula cannot be provided for this specific UVCB substance)
IUPAC Name:
Esterification Products of Phosphorus Pentoxide and Alcohols C6-C10 (even numbered)
Details on test material:
Sponsor's identification: Esterification products of Phosphorus Pentoxide and Alcohols C6-C10 (Even numbered)
CAS number : 68307-94-8
Identifier : TIS 02891
Description : amber coloured slightly viscous liquid
Batch number : CI1E0447 solvent free
Date received : 13 June 2011
Expiry date : 29 May 2013
Storage conditions: room temperature in the dark


Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Five male and five female Wistar (RccHan™:WIST) strain rats were supplied by Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Oxon, UK. On receipt the animals were randomly allocated to cages. The females were nulliparous and non-pregnant. After an acclimatisation period of at least five days the animals were selected at random and given a number unique within the study by indelible ink-marking on the tail and a number written on a cage card. At the start of the study the animals weighed at least 200g, and were eight to twelve weeks of age. The weight variation did not exceed +/-20% of the mean weight for either sex at the start of treatment.

The animals were housed in suspended solid floor polypropylene cages furnished with woodflakes. The animals were housed individually during the 24 Hour exposure period and in groups of up to four, by sex, for the remainder of the study. Free access to mains drinking water and food (2014C Teklad Global Rodent diet supplied by Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Oxon, UK) was allowed throughout the study. The diet, drinking water and bedding were routinely analysed and were considered not to contain any contaminants that could reasonably be expected to affect the purpose or integrity of the study.

The temperature and relative humidity were set to achieve limits of 19 to 25°C and 30 to 70% respectively. Any occasional deviations from these targets were considered not to have affected the purpose or integrity of the study. The rate of air exchange was at least fifteen changes per hour and the lighting was controlled by a time switch to give twelve hours continuous light (06:00 to 18:00) and twelve hours darkness.

The animals were provided with environmental enrichment items which were considered not to contain any contaminant of a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study.

Administration / exposure

Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on dermal exposure:
TEST SITE
On the day before treatment the back and flanks of each animal were clipped free of hair.

In the absence of data suggesting the test item was toxic, a single group of animals (1 male and 1 female) was initially treated at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg.

The calculated volume of test item, as received, was applied as evenly as possible to an area of shorn skin (approximately 10% of the total body surface area) using a graduated syringe. A piece of surgical gauze was placed over the treatment area and semi-occluded with a piece of self-adhesive bandage. The animals were caged individually for the 24-Hour exposure period. Shortly after dosing the dressings were examined to ensure that they were securely in place.


REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
After the 24 Hour contact period the bandage was carefully removed and the treated skin and surrounding hair wiped with cotton wool moistened with distilled water to remove any residual test item.
Duration of exposure:
24 hours
Doses:
2000 mg/kg body weight
No. of animals per sex per dose:
Initial group at 2000 mg/kg: 1 male and 1 female
Further group at 2000 mg/kg: 4 males and 4 females
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days

- Frequency of observations and weighing:
The animals were observed for deaths or overt signs of toxicity ½, 1, 2 and 4 hours after dosing and subsequently once daily for fourteen days.

After removal of the dressings and subsequently once daily for fourteen days, the test sites were examined for evidence of primary irritation and scored according to the Draize scale (see evaluation of skin reactions).

Any other skin reactions, if present were also recorded.

Individual bodyweights were recorded prior to application of the test item on Day 0 and on Days 7 and 14.

- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
At the end of the study the animals were killed by cervical dislocation. All animals were subjected to gross necropsy. This consisted of an external examination and opening of the abdominal and thoracic cavities. The appearance of any macroscopic abnormalities was recorded. No tissues were retained.

Statistics:
No statistical analysis was performed.

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: 95% confidence limits not reported.
Mortality:
Individual mortality data are given in Table 1 (see attached background material).
There were no deaths.


Clinical signs:
other: Individual clinical observations are given in Table 1 (see attached background material). There were no signs of systemic toxicity.
Gross pathology:
Individual necropsy findings are given in Table 5 (see attached background material).
No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.
Other findings:
Dermal Reactions
Individual dermal reactions are given in Table 2 and Table 3 (see attached background material).
Signs of dermal irritation noted were very slight to well-defined erythema, very slight oedema, crust formation, haemorrhage of the dermal capillaries, small superficial scattered scabs and glossy skin.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not classified
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The acute dermal median lethal dose (LDso) of the test item in the Wistar strain rat was found to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bodyweight.
Executive summary:

Introduction.

The study was performed to assess the acute dermal toxicity of the test item in the Wistar strain rat. The method was designed to be compatible with the following:

• OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals No. 402 "Acute Dermal Toxicity" (adopted 24 February 1987)

• Method B3 Acute Toxicity (Dermal) of Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008

• United States Environmental Protection Agency Health Effects Test Guidelines OPPTS 870.1200 Acute Dermal Toxicity August 1998

• Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF), Testing Guidelines for Toxicology Studies, 12 NohSan No. 8147, amended 26 June 2001

• Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare, 1992

Method.

Initially, two animals (one male and one female) were given a single, 24 hour, semi-occluded dermal application of the undiluted test item to intact skin at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bodyweight. Based on the results of the initial test, a further group of eight animals (four males and four females) was similarly treated. Clinical signs and bodyweight development were monitored during the study. All animals were subjected to gross necropsy.

Mortality.

There were no deaths.

Clinical Observations.

There were no signs of systemic toxicity.

Dermal Irritation.

Signs of dermal irritation noted were very slight to well-defined erythema, very slight oedema, crust formation, haemorrhage of the dermal capillaries, small superficial scattered scabs and glossy skin.

Bodyweight.

Six animals showed bodyweight loss or no gain in bodyweight during the first week but expected gain in bodyweight during the second week. The remaining four animals showed expected gains in bodyweight over the study period.

Necropsy.

No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.

Conclusion.

The acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) of the test item in the Wistar strain rat was found to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bodyweight.

The test item did not meet the criteria for classification according to the Classification, Labelling and Packaging Regulation or the Globally Harmonised Classification System.