Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

The substance was observed to be non-carcinogenic in male C3H/HeJ mice after dermal application of 25 µL10% v/v in acetone twice daily for 94 weeks (Cytec, 1987). However, the study design is outdated and the study is rated as less reliable and only used as supportive information.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Carcinogenicity: via oral route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Carcinogenicity: via inhalation route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Carcinogenicity: via dermal route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
carcinogenicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
other information
Study period:
From September 10, 1984 to June 28, 1986
Reliability:
3 (not reliable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
significant methodological deficiencies
Remarks:
Study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific standards but study design is outdated. Therefore study is rated as less reliable and only used as supportive information.
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Groups of male C3H/HeJ mice (50/dose) were topically treated with 25 µL of 10 % v/v test item in acetone, twice weekly for 94 weeks. The skin from all animals was examined histologically for non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions. Histological examination of internal organs was performed on one half of the mice of each group.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Species:
mouse
Strain:
other: C3H/HeJ
Sex:
male
Route of administration:
dermal
Vehicle:
other: Acetone and deionized water
Details on exposure:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 25 µL
- Concentration: 10% glycerol propoxylate triacrylate in acetone
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Duration of treatment / exposure:
94 weeks
Frequency of treatment:
Twice/week
Post exposure period:
No
Dose / conc.:
10 other: %
Remarks:
v/v in acetone (nominal conc.)
No. of animals per sex per dose:
50
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale: Doses were selected on the basis of a pilot study
Positive control:
0.025 % benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) in acetone
Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
DERMAL IRRITATION: Yes

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
Sacrifice and pathology:
GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes (see Tables Ce 84-1-14)

HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes (see Tables 1-42)
- Skin from the application sites of all mice, all skin tumors and suspected skin lesions were examined histologically
- Internal organs and tissues of 25 mice/group, randomly selected, were examined microscopically
Clinical signs:
effects observed, treatment-related
Mortality:
mortality observed, treatment-related
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
not examined
Food efficiency:
not examined
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not examined
Ophthalmological findings:
not examined
Haematological findings:
not examined
Clinical biochemistry findings:
not examined
Urinalysis findings:
not examined
Behaviour (functional findings):
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
not specified
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
no effects observed
Details on results:
CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY
- Survival (%): 100, 92, 86, 76, 54, 44 and 30 recorded at 13, 26, 39, 52, 65, 78 and 91 weeks, respectively
- No significant signs of toxicity

BODY WEIGHT AND WEIGHT GAIN
- No significant difference between body weight gains between test and control groups

HISTOPATHOLOGY: NEOPLASTIC/ NON-NEOPLASTIC:

SKIN
- Blank and vehicle control: Slight or moderate degree non-neoplastic lesions; fibrosis of the dermis and acanthosis, keratosis and hyperplasia of the epidermis; no skin neoplasms
- Treatment group (C-663): Moderate fibrosis of the dermis with scar formation, moderate degree of acanthosis and keratosis of the epidermis with dysplastic changes; papillary hyperplasia; no skin neoplasms

INTERNAL ORGANS
- Blank control: Moderate to severe urinary tract infection and prostatitis; myocarditis and slight to moderate pneumonia; age-related atrophy of the testes, lymphocytic lymphoma (in 1 mouse) and hepatocellular carcinoma (in 6 mice)
- Vehicle control: Prostate and urinary tract infections; age-related atrophy of testis (in 9 mice) and hepatocellular carcinoma (in 7 mice)
- Treatment group (C-663): Lung, urinary tract and prostate infections; lymphocytic lymphoma (in 1 mice), hepatocellular carcinomas (in 8 mice) and angioma in the liver (in 1 mouse)
Relevance of carcinogenic effects / potential:
Incidence of carcinomas in animals treated with test item were within the range of those detected in historical control animals for C3H/HeJ strain of mice
Dose descriptor:
dose level: 10 % v/v in acetone
Effect level:
10 other: %
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male
Basis for effect level:
histopathology: neoplastic
Key result
Critical effects observed:
no
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
19.5 mg/kg bw/day
Study duration:
chronic
Species:
mouse

Justification for classification or non-classification

Classification, Labeling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008

Based on the available data, classification for carcinogencity is not triggerd according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, as amended for the twelfth time in Regulation (EU) 2019/521.

Additional information

There are no valid experimental data available to assess the carcinogenicity of the test substance. Nevertheless, a less reliable study is available delivering supportive information for weigh of evidence approaches.

Studies according to other protocols:

A study (Cytec, 1987) was conducted to assess the carcinogenic potential and chronic dermal toxicity of GPOTA in male C3H/HeJ mice. Therefore groups of male C3H/HeJ mice (50/dose) were topically treated with 25 µL of 10 % v/v GPOTA in acetone, twice weekly for 94 weeks. The dose and concentration of each material were selected after completion of a pilot study. Control animals received no treatment or 50 µL of acetone twice weekly. Positive control group received 50 µL twice weekly of 0.025 % benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) in acetone. The skin from all animals was examined histological for non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions. Histological examination of internal organs was performed on one half of the mice of each group. Survival (%) in mice treated with GPOTA was calculated to be 100, 92, 86, 76, 54, 44 and 30 at 13, 26, 39, 52, 65, 78 and 91 weeks, respectively. No significant difference between body weight gains was observed between test and control groups. Moderate fibrosis of the dermis with scar formation, moderate degree of acanthosis and keratosis of the epidermis with dysplastic changes; papillary hyperplasia were observed at application sites. Skin neoplasms were not observed. Examination of internal organs revealed no treatment related lesions. Pathological examination revealed lung, urinary tract and prostate infections; lymphocytic lymphoma (in 1 mice), hepatocellular carcinomas (in 8 mice) and angioma in the liver (in 1 mouse). In conclusion, GPOTA was not carcinogenic in male C3H/HeJ mice. (Applicant calculation of application per day: 1000/30 (correction bw) * 25 µL * 0.1 (concentration) 0.82 g/cm3 (density correction 20 µL TI + 180 µL Aceton (ideal calculated))) * 2/7 (two time per week application without depot)=19.5 mg/kg bw/day).

Assessment of in vivo carcinogenicity:

As no concern for carcinogenic potential is derived from the genetic toxicity tests, and a less reliable but negative carcinogenicity test with mice shows also no evidence for dermal carcinogenicity of GPOTA no increased carcinogenic potential is suspected. No further tests are proposed on this information.