Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
20 July to 30 August 2005
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Recent study conducted by a GLP certified laboratory in accordance with a suitable study guideline.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2005
Report date:
2005

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
TIS-M
IUPAC Name:
TIS-M
Details on test material:
- Name of test material: TIS-M
- Lot/batch No.: 3301 MS-0505-4
- Storage condition of test material: Under nitrogen at room temperature, in the dark.

Method

Target gene:
Three mutant strains of Salmonella are incapable of synthesising histidine and are dependant on an external source of this particular amino acid for normal growth. When exposed to a mutagenic agent these bacteria may undergo a reverse mutation to histidine independant forms which are detected by their ability to grow on a histidine deficient medium. Using various strains of the organism, revertants produced after exposure to a chemical mutagen may arise as a result of base-pair substition in the genetic material (miscoding) or a frame-shift mutation in which the genetic material is inther added or deleted. In order to make the bacteria more sensitive to mutation by chemical and physical agents, several additional traits have been introduced. These include a deletion through the excision repair gene (uvrB- Salmonella strains) which renders the organism incapble of DNA excision repair and deep rough mutation (rfa) which increases the permeability of the cell wall. A mutant strain of Escherichia coli (WP2uvrA-) , which requires tryptophan and which can be reverse mutated by base substition to trytophan independence was used to complement Salmonella strains. This strain also has a deletion in an excision repair gene (uvrA-). Since many compounds do not exert a mutagenic effect until this have been metabolised by enzyme systems not available in the bacterial cell, the test material and the bacteria also incubated in the prescence of a (S9-mix) prepared from rats pre-treated with a mixture known to induce an elevated level of these enzymes.
Species / strainopen allclose all
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
other: Incapable of synthesising histidine.
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
other: Incapable of synthesising histidine.
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
liver microsomal preparation S9-mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Preliminary toxicity test: 0, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate
Main Test: 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: acetone
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Information from sponsor advised against the use of sterile distilled water.
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
2-Aminoanthracene; Benzo(a)pyrene
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: N-ethyl-N'-nitro-nitrosoguanidine (ENNG); 9-Aminoacridine; 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide.
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
Tester strains:
The Salmonella strains were obtained from the University of California at Berkley on culture discs on August 4 1995 whilst Escherichia coli strain WP2uvra- was obtained from the British Industrial Biological Research Association on 17 August 1987. All strains were sotred at -196 °C in a Statebourne liquid nitrogen freezer, model SXR 34. Prior to the master strains being used, characterisation checks were carried out to confirm the amino-acid requirement, prescence of rfa, uvrB or uvrA mutation and the spontaneous reversion rate. In this assay, overnight subcultures of the appropriate coded stock cultures were prepared in nutrient broth (Oxoid Ltd; lot no: 350536 06/09) and incubated at 37 °C for approximately 10 hours. Each culture was monitored spectrophotometrically for turbidity with titres determined by viable count analysis on nutrient agar plates.

Preparation of Test and Control Materials:
The test material was immiscible in dimethyl sulphoxide at 50mg/ml but was fully miscible in acetone at the same concentration in solubility checks performed in-house. Acetone was used as the vehicle. The test material was accurately weighed and approximate half-log dilutions prepared in acetone by mixing on a vortex mixer on the day of each experiment. Analysis for concentration, homogenicity and stability of test material formualtions was not a requirement for the guideline so it was not carried out. Prior to use, the solvent was dried using molecular sieves (sodium alumino-silicate) i.e. 2mm pellets with a nominal pore diameter of 4x10^-4 microns.Vehicle and positive controls were used in parallel with the test material. A solvent treatment group was used as the vehicle control and the positive contol and positive control materials used in a series of plates without S9 -mix were as follows:

-N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (ENNG): 3µg/plate for TA100, 5µg/plate for TA1535 and 2µg/plate for WP2uvrA-.
-9 -Aminoacridine (9AA): 80µg/plate for TA98

In addition, 2 -Aminoanthracene (2AA) and Benzo(a)pyrene (BP), which are non-mutagenic in the absence of metabolising enzymes, which were used in the series of plates with S9 -mix at the following concentrations:
-2AA at 1µg/plate for TA100
-2AA at 2µ/plate for TA1535 and TA1537
-BP at 5µg/plate for TA98.
-2AA at 10µg/plate for WPuvrA-

Microsomal enzyme fraction:
S9 was prepared in-house on 15 May 2005 (preliminary toxicity and range finding tests) and 10 July 2005 (main test) from the livers of male Sprague-dawley rats weighing ~ 250g. These had each orally recieved three consecutive daily doses of phenorbitone/β-napthoflavone (80/100 mg per kg per day) prior to S9 preparation on day 4. Before use, each batch of S9 was assayed for its ability to metabolise appropriate indirect mutagens used in the Ames test.

S9 -Mix and Agar:
The S9 -mix was prepared immediately before using sterilised co-factors and maintained on ice for the duration of thes test.
S9 - 5.0ml
1.65 M KCl/0.4M MgCl2 - 1.0ml
0.1M Glucose-6 -phosphate - 2.5ml
0.1M NADPH - 2.0ml
0.1M NADH - 2.0ml
0.2 M Sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) - 25.0ml
Sterile distilled water - 12.5ml

A 0.5ml aliquot of S9 -mix and 2ml of molten, trace histidine or trytophan supplemente, top agar were overlaid onto a steri;e Vogel-Bonner Minimal agar plate in order to assess the sterility of the S9 -mix. This procedure was repeated, in triplicate, on the day of each experiment. Top agar was prepared using 0.6% Difco Bacto agar (lot no: 4348296 09/09) and 0.5% sodium chloride with 5ml of 1.0mM fistidine and 1.0mM biotin or 1.0mM trytophan solution added to each 100ml of top agar. Vogel-Bonner Minimal agar plates purchased from ILS Ltd. (Lot nos: 899855 -02 01/10 and 903393-02 02/10).

Method: Preliminary toxicity test:
The aim of the test was to select appropriate dose levels for the main test. The concentrations tested were 0, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000µg/plate. 0.1ml of the bacterial culture (TA100 or WP2uvrA-), 2ml of molten trace histidine or tryptophan supplemented, top agar, 0.1ml of the test material formulation and 0.5ml of S9 -mix or phosphate buffer were mixed, and were applied to sterile plates of Vogel Bonner Minimal agar (30ml/plate). 10 concentrations of the test material formulation and a vehicle control (acetone) were tested. 0.1ml of the maximum concentration of the test material and 2ml of molten, trace histidine or tryptophan supplemented, top agar were also overlaid onto a sterile Nutrient agar plate in order to assess the sterility of the test material. After approximately 48hrs incubation at 37 °C the plates were assessed for numbers of revertant colonies using a Domino colony counter and examined for effects on the growth of the bacterial background lawn.

Method: Main Test: Experiment 1:
Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA 100 and Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA- were treated with the test material using the Ames plate incorporation method at five dose levels (50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000µg/plate), in triplicate, both with and without the addition of rat liver homogenate metabolising system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors). Measured aliquots (0.1ml) of one of the bacterial cultures were dispensed into sets of test tubes followed by 2.0ml of molten, trace histidine or tryptophan supplemented, top agar, 0.1ml of the test formulation, vehicle or positive control, as well as either 0.5ml of S9 -mix or phosphate buffer.The dose range was determined in a preliminary toxicity assay and was 50 to 500µg/plate in the first experiment. The contents of each test tube were mixed and evenly distributed onto Vogel-Bonner Minimal agar plates (one tube per plate). Incubation was at 37 °C and lasted for 48hrs, after which the frequency of revertant colonies was assessed using a Domino colony counter.

Method: Main Test: Experiment 2:
The experiment was repeated on a separate day using the same dose range as experiment 1, fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test formulations.

Acceptance Criteria:
The reverse mutation assay may be considered to be valid if the following criteria are met:
-All tester strain cultures exhibit a characteristic noumber of spontaneous revertants per plate in the vehicle and untreated controls.
-The appropriate characteristics for each tester strain have been confirmed e.g. rfa cell-wall mutation and pKM101 plasmid R-factor etc.
-All tester strain cultures should be in the approximate range of 1 to 9.9 x 10^9 bacteria per ml.
- Each positive control value should be at least twice the respective vehicle control for each strain, thus demonstrating both the intrinsic sensitivity of the tester strains to mutagenic exposure and the integrity of the S9 -mix.
-There should be a minimum of 4 non-toxic material dose levels.
-There should be no evidence of excessive contamination.


METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar

DURATION
- Preincubation period: no data
- Exposure duration: 3 days

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 per concentration/vehicle control/positive and negative control
Evaluation criteria:
There are several criteria for determining a positive result, such as a dose-related increase in revertant frequency over the dose range testes and/ora reproducible increase at one or more concentrations in at least one bacterial strain with or without metabolic activation. Biological relevence of the results will be considered first, statistical methods, as recommended by UKEMS can also be used to aid evaluation (not only determing factor). A testmaterial will be considered non-mutagenic (negative) if the test system if the above criteria are not met.

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
See below.
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Remarks on results:

Results for the negative controls (spontaneous mutation rates) were considered to be acceptable. The test material caused no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial lawn at any dose level. The test material was therefore tested up the maximum recommended dose level of 5000µg/plate. An oily precipitate was obseved at 5000µg/plate but this did not prevent the scoring of revertant colonies. no significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the strains of bacteria, at any dose level either with or without metabolic activation. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, thus confirming the activity of the S9 -mix and the sensitivity of the bacterial strains.

Table 1: Preliminary toxicity test:

With (+) or without (-)

S9-mix

Strain

Dose (µg/plate)

0

0.15

0.5

1.5

5

15

50

150

500

1500

5000

-

TA100

86

145

131

121

87

112

117

132

147

126

117P

+

TA100

101

82

86

82

77

89

99

106

120

92

98P

-

WP2uvrA-

24

24

22

24

19

20

18

27

23

13

20P

+

WP2uvrA-

41

36

33

29

29

33

38

36

41

37

37P

Table 2: Main study: Spontaneuous Mutation Rates (Concurrent Negaative Controls): Experiment 1:

Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate)

Base-pair substitution type

Frameshift type

TA100

TA1535

WP2uvrA-

TA98

TA1537

71

15

21

13

2

60                (72)

11                (14)

28               (24)

21                (18)

8                   (6)

85

15

22

18

8

Table 2: Main study: Spontaneuous Mutation Rates (Concurrent Negaative Controls): Experiment 2:

Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate)

Base-pair substitution type

Frameshift type

TA100

TA1535

WP2uvrA-

TA98

TA1537

90

29

27

18

14

110            (103)

30               (28)

18               (22)

13               (18)

6                   (8)

109

24

22

22

5

Table 3: Main Study: Test Results: Experiment 1 - Without Metabolic Activation:

Test period

From: 16 August 2005

To: 19 August 2005

With or without

S9-Mix

Test substance concentration

(µg)

Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate)

Base Pair Substitution type

Frameshift type

TA100

TA1535

WP2uvrA-

TA98

TA1537

-

0

89

14

18

25

11

86     (86)

10    (13)

33     (23)

16    (20)

9      (10)

82      3.5*

15   2.6

19      8.4

18    4.7

11    1.2

-

50

102

13

19

27

9

91     (93)

10   (14)

16     (20)

19     (24)

14     (11)

86     8.2

18   4.0

25     4.6

25     4.2

10     2.6

-

150

97

13

31

14

8

101   (99)

10    (15)

19     (23)

14      (13)

13     (11)

98      2.1

23    6.8

18      7.2

11      1.7

13     2.9

-

500

81

11

18

24

8

104   (101)

11     (12)

22    (21)

23     (22)

14      (9)

117    18.2

15     2.3

23   2.6

18     3.2

6        4.2

-

1500

105

14

17

21

13

110   (106)

26    (19)

25    (19)

32      (28)

15     (12)

102    4.0

17    6.2

15    5.3

32      6.4

9        3.1

-

5000

87P

15P

28P

24P

8P

101P (103)

10P   (15)

28P   (26)

21P     (25)

8P       (9)

121P  17.1

19P   4.5

22P   3.5

29P      4.0

10P     1.2

Positive

Controls

 

S9-Mix

-

Name

Concentration

(µg/plate)

No. colonies per plate

ENNG

ENNG

ENNG

4NQO

9AA

3

5

2

0.2

80

283

225   (261)

276     31.7

136

134   (138)

145      5.9

521

452   (466)

424    49.9

162

123   (147)

156    21.0

634

296   (434)

372   177.3

- ENNG = N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosguanidine

- 4NQO = 4 -Nitroquinoline-1 -oxide

- 9AA = 9 -Aminoacridine

- P = precipitate.

- * = standard deviation

Table 4: Main Study: Test Results: Experiment 1 - With Metabolic Activation:

Test period

From: 16 August 2005

To: 19 August 2005

With or without

S9-Mix

Test substance concentration

(µg)

Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate)

Base Pair Substitution type

Frameshift type

TA100

TA1535

WP2uvrA-

TA98

TA1537

+

0

92

13

26

23

11

70    (79)

13    (11)

26     (29)

26    (27)

11    (11)

74     11.7*

8      2.9

34      4.6

31    4.0

11    0.0

+

50

64

8

20

33

13

82     (77)

9       (9)

23     (22)

28     (27)

10     (10)

86     11.7

9       0.6

24     2.1

19     7.1

8      2.5

+

150

67

9

18

28

11

70     (71)

13    (13)

22     (22)

19      (22)

18     (14)

77      5.1

17    4.0

26      4.0

20      4.9

13      3.6

+

500

96

11

25

34

10

97     (94)

16     (12)

36    (30)

33     (33)

9        (11)

88      4.9

8       4.0

28    5.7

33     0.6

14       2.6

+

1500

102

14

21

29

4

85       (98)

10    (11)

28    (27)

20      (23)

5       (6)

107    11.5

10    2.3

32    5.6

20      5.2

10     3.2

+

5000

91P

16P

36P

32P

11P

105P  (94)

11P   (14)

25P   (31)

33P    (35)

13P    (12)

86P   9.8

14P   2.5

31P   5.5

39P    3.8

111P     1.2

Positive

Controls

 

S9-Mix

+

Name

Concentration

(µg/plate)

No. colonies per plate

2AA

2AA

2AA

BP

2AA

1

2

10

5

2

1024

713   (951)

1117 211.6

170

176   (174)

176   3.5

237

255   (251)

260   12.1

126

118   (115)

101   12.8

258

113  (177)

160  74.0

- 2AA = 2 -Aminoanthracene

- BP = Benzo(a)pyrene

- P = Precipitate

- * = Standard Deviation

Table 5: Main Study: Test Results: Experiment 2 - Without Metabolic Activation:

Test period

From: 26 August 2005

To: 29 August 2005

With or without

S9-Mix

Test substance concentration

(µg)

Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate)

Base Pair Substitution type

Frameshift type

TA100

TA1535

WP2uvrA-

TA98

TA1537

-

0

104

18

32

19

14

102   (101)

19    (19)

22     (25)

20    (20)

14    (12)

98      3.1*

21    1.5

21      6.1

22    1.5

9      2.9

-

50

96

20

26

16

2

95       (96)

18       (17)

24     (24)

22     (20)

11     (11)

100    2.6

14       3.1

23     1.5

23     3.8

11     0.6

-

150

76

14

29

23

9

106     (98)

14    (15)

22     (29)

25      (22)

10     (10)

112     19.3

16     1.2

35      6.5

19      3.1

10      0.6

-

500

91

14

21

16

8

95       (99)

16     (16)

25    (25)

18     (19)

9        (9)

112     11.2

19      2.5

30    4.5

22     3.1

11       1.5

-

1500

86

16

16

22

9

99       (94)

15    (16)

29    (22)

18      (20)

9       (9)

98      10.8

16    0.6

21     6.6

21      2.1

10     0.6

-

5000

87P

13P

25P

19P

13P

104P  (99)

18P   (15)

18P   (22)

16P    (19)

8P    (10)

107P   10.8

15P   2.5

23P   3.6

23P    3.5

9P     2.6

Positive

Controls

 

S9-Mix

-

Name

Concentration

(µg/plate)

No. colonies per plate

ENNG

ENNG

ENNG

4NQO

9AA

3

5

2

0.2

80

491

406   (437)

414    46.9

211

196   (280)

434   133.3

710

605   (664)

678    53.8

173

191   (200)

236   32.4

733

214  (404)

264   286.3

- ENNG = N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosguanidine

- 4NQO = 4 -Nitroquinoline-1 -oxide

- 9AA = 9 -Aminoacridine

- P = precipitate.

- * = standard deviation

Table 6: Main Study: Test Results: Experiment 2 - With Metabolic Activation:

Test period

From: 26 August 2005

To: 29 August 2005

With or without

S9-Mix

Test substance concentration

(µg)

Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate)

Base Pair Substitution type

Frameshift type

TA100

TA1535

WP2uvrA-

TA98

TA1537

+

0

87

12

36

23

20

77      (88)

12    (12)

38     (39)

41    (32)

21    (21)

100   11.5*

12     0.0

44      4.2

31    9.0

23     1.5

+

50

93

12

31

24

16

85       (96)

10      (11)

31     (35)

34     (80)

18     (17)

87       4.2

11       1.0

42     6.4

27     5.1

18     1.2

+

150

75

13

32

34

15

79     (82)

12    (12)

30    (30)

36      (34)

16     (17)

92     8.9

12     0.6

29      1.5

31      2.5

19      2.1

+

500

98

12

30

37

14

91       (95)

11     (12)

41    (35)

36     (34)

18      (16)

95       3.5

13      1.0

35    5.5

30     3.8

15       2.1

+

1500

89

12

37

35

16

88       (93)

10    (11)

34    (36)

30      (30)

19       (18)

102      7.8

10     1.2

36     1.5

26      4.5

20       2.1

+

5000

98P

15P

38P

31P

20P

87P    (95)

12P   (13)

35P   (39)

27P    (30)

22P    (21)

99P    6.7

11P   2.1

44P   4.6

33P    3.1

21P     1.0

Positive

Controls

 

S9-Mix

+

Name

Concentration

(µg/plate)

No. colonies per plate

2AA

2AA

2AA

BP

2AA

1

2

10

5

2

1218

1061(1083)

971  125.0

246

196   (209)

186    32.1

631

611   (664)

567    53.8

187

201   (187)

174   13.5

374

306  (326)

297   42.1

- ENNG = N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosguanidine

- 4NQO = 4 -Nitroquinoline-1 -oxide

- 9AA = 9 -Aminoacridine

- P = precipitate.

- * = standard deviation

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative

The registered substance was determined to be non-mutagenic.
Executive summary:

A genetic study of the substance was carried out according to EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria) using Salmonella typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 and Escherichia coli WP2 uvr A.

The registered substance and the bacteria were applied to agar and after 3 days the substance was determined to be non-mutagenic.