Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP study according to EU / OECD guideline.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1997

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Cyclohexylethylcarbamoyl chloride
EC Number:
263-753-6
EC Name:
Cyclohexylethylcarbamoyl chloride
Cas Number:
62899-75-6
Molecular formula:
C9H16ClNO
IUPAC Name:
N-cyclohexyl-N-ethylcarbamoyl chloride
Test material form:
other: liquid

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
other: Hsd Poc:DH
Sex:
male

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Concentration / amount:
Intradermal induction: 5%
Topical induction: 100%
Challenge: 20% and 5%
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
other: Intradermal and Topical induction
Vehicle:
corn oil
Remarks:
induction and the challenge treatment
Concentration / amount:
Intradermal induction: 5%
Topical induction: 100%
Challenge: 20% and 5%
No. of animals per dose:
9
Challenge controls:
5 animals

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
5%
No. with + reactions:
9
Total no. in group:
9
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 9.0. Total no. in groups: 9.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
5%
No. with + reactions:
9
Total no. in group:
9
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 72.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 9.0. Total no. in groups: 9.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
20%
No. with + reactions:
9
Total no. in group:
9
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 20%. No with. + reactions: 9.0. Total no. in groups: 9.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
20%
No. with + reactions:
9
Total no. in group:
9
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 72.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 20%. No with. + reactions: 9.0. Total no. in groups: 9.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
5%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
20%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 72.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 20%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.

Any other information on results incl. tables

The challenge using 5% and 20% test substance formulations led to skin effects in all animals which could be evaluated in the treatment group and in none of the animals in the control group.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
In summary, under the conditions of the maximization test and with respect to the evaluation criteria the test substance therefore thus exhibits a skin-sensitization potential.