Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
1.29 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
75
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
55 mg/kg bw/day
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Value:
97 mg/m³
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

assuming 10% absorption via oral and 10% via inhalative route the NOAEL of 55 mg/kg bw/d from a subacute study is corrected by multiplying with 10/10 and division by 0.38 m3/kg for air consumption and multiplication with 6.7/10 for light work adjustment --> NOAECcorr = 55 mg/kg bw/d * 10/10 * 6.7/10 *1/ 0.38 m3/kg/d = 97.0 mg/m3

AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
NOAEC is used as the starting point
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
based on the subacute study
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Justification:
allometric scaling is not applied for the derivation of inhalation DNEL (included in the NOAECcorr).
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
no other substance-specific data are available.
AF for intraspecies differences:
5
Justification:
default fator for workers
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
Available data from substance fulfilling scientific principle is used .
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
no other uncertainties needed to be considered.
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
0.183 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
300
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
55 mg/kg bw/day
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
55 mg/kg bw/day
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

In general, dermal absorption will not be higher than oral absorption, no default factor (i.e. factor 1) should be introduced when performing oral-to-dermal extrapolation and absorption rates are assumed 10% for both routes.

AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
NOAEL is used as the starting point
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
based on the subacute study
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
rats are used
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
no other substance-specific effects are available
AF for intraspecies differences:
5
Justification:
default factor for workers
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
Available data fulfil the scientific requirements
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
no other uncertainties need to be considered.
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information
DNEL extrapolated from long term DNEL

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - workers

Barium bis( di C8-C10, branched, C9 rich, alkylnaphthalene sulphonate) has a low vapour pressure and is not expect to volatilize. Its uses indicate inhalation exposure to be the unlikely route of exposure to human in regular use.

A worst case scenario is assumed in which the absorption rate from dermal route is considered to be same as oral route, and for both routes assumed to be 10%.

An OECD 422 study was conducted with Barium DNNSA (Barium bis( di C8-C10, branched, C9 rich, alkylnaphthalene sulphonate). The NOAEL for Barium DNNSA is 55 mg/kg/day. The NOAEL for Barium DNNSA is based on effects on the kidney which is known as the target organ for barium toxicity.

Based on these results, the No Observed Adverse Effect Levels (NOAEL) was established as 55 mg/kg.

Therefore, the NOAEL of 55 mg/kg/day was used as the starting point for DNEL, and NOAELcorr for the dermal route is still 55 mg/kg bw/day. According to ECHA guidance document the oral NOAEL is converted to an inhalation NOAECWorker of 97.0 mg/m3 (0.38 m3/kg in case of 8 h exposure/d for worker and 6.7/10 for light work adjustment), and as inhalative and dermal absorption both are assumed being 10% no correction was applied.

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - General Population

No consumer exposure is anticipated.