Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2009
Report date:
2009

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.2600 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-[(1E)-2-[(3Z)-2-chloro-3-{2-[(2E)-1,1-dimethyl-3-(4-sulfobutyl)-1H,2H,3H-benzo[e]indol-2-ylidene]ethylidene}cyclohex-1-en-1-yl]ethenyl]-1,1-dimethyl-3-(4-sulfonatobutyl)-1H-benzo[e]indol-3-ium amine
EC Number:
700-626-0
Cas Number:
1073607-50-7
Molecular formula:
C46 H50 Cl N2 O6 S2 . H4 N
IUPAC Name:
2-[(1E)-2-[(3Z)-2-chloro-3-{2-[(2E)-1,1-dimethyl-3-(4-sulfobutyl)-1H,2H,3H-benzo[e]indol-2-ylidene]ethylidene}cyclohex-1-en-1-yl]ethenyl]-1,1-dimethyl-3-(4-sulfonatobutyl)-1H-benzo[e]indol-3-ium amine

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
Details on test animals: 20 females (nulliparous and non-pregnant), five females per group, young adult animals (approx. 9 weeks ols), body weight variation was within +/- 20% of the sex mean.

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Challenge controls:
vehicle control: 0% test substance, 100% propylene glycol

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
propylene glycol
Concentration:
10%, 25% and 50%
No. of animals per dose:
5
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
The SI values calculated for the substance concentrations 5, 10 and 25% were 1.5, 1.9 and 6.1 respectively. An EC3 value of 13.9% was calculated using linear interpolation. The calculated EC3 value was found to be in the acceptable range of 2 and 20%. The results of the 6 monthly HCA reliability checks of the recent years were 9.5, 13.1, 14.1 and 13.8%.
Based on the results, it was concluded that the LLNA as performed at Notox is an appropriate model for testing for contact hypersensitivity.

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Parameter:
SI
Remarks on result:
other: The SI values calculated for the substance concentrations 10, 25 and 50% were 1.1, 2.1 and 2.7 respectively.
Parameter:
other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
Remarks on result:
other: Mean DPM/animal values for the experimental groups treated with test substance concentrations 10, 25 and 50% were 311, 590 and 782 respectively. The mean DPM/animal value for the vehicle control group was 287.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Skin reactions/irritation: Green/brown staining by the test substance prevented scoring for erythema. No oedema was observed in any of the animals examined.

Macroscopy of the auricular lymph nodes and surrounding area: All nodes of the experimental and control groups were considered normal in size, except for the lymph nodes of one animal at 50%. No macroscopic abnormalities of the surrounding area were noted.

Body weights: Body weights and body weight gain of experimental animals remained in the same range as controls over the study period.

Toxicity and mortality: No mortality occurred and no symptoms of systemic toxicity were observed in the animals of the main study.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: OECD GHS, EC No1272/2008, Directive 67/548/EEC
Conclusions:
Since there was no indication that the test substance elicits an SI>=3 when tested up to 50%, the test substance was considered not to be a skin sensitizer.