Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Not specified
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study conducted to GLP (taken from SNIF file). Registrant referring to studies >12 years old at the permission of ECHA.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
other: Body responsible for the test
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1999
Report date:
1999

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
-
EC Number:
432-130-2
EC Name:
-
Cas Number:
119345-01-6
Molecular formula:
Not applicable ( a generic molecular formula cannot be provided for this UVCB substance)
IUPAC Name:
Reaction products of phosphorous trichloride, with 1,1′-biphenyl and 2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenol
Details on test material:
No data

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Himalayan
Sex:
not specified
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
No data

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal and epicutaneous
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
Concentration of test material and vehicle used at induction:
Induction lntradermal:
1) 0.1 ml solution CFA: physiological saline (50: 50)
2) 1% test substance in TWEEN 80
3) 1% substance of essal in una solution CFA: physiological saline (50: 50)
Induction epidermale: 75% in TWEEN 80
Concentration of test substance material and vehicle used for each challenge: 75% test substance in TWEEN 80
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal and epicutaneous
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
Concentration of test material and vehicle used at induction:
Induction lntradermal:
1) 0.1 ml solution CFA: physiological saline (50: 50)
2) 1% test substance in TWEEN 80
3) 1% substance of essal in una solution CFA: physiological saline (50: 50)
Induction epidermale: 75% in TWEEN 80
Concentration of test substance material and vehicle used for each challenge: 75% test substance in TWEEN 80
No. of animals per dose:
Number of animals in test group: 20
Number of animals In negative control group: 10
Details on study design:
No data
Challenge controls:
No data
Positive control substance(s):
not specified

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 0%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
75%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 75%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 0%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
75%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 75%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
75%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 75%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
75%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 75%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Maximum concentration not causing irritating effects in preliminary test: 75%

Signs of irritation during induction: test group: 0/20 animals displayed oedema or erythema after the induction. 

Negative Control group: 0/5 animals displayed oedema or erythema after the induction. 

Evidence of sensitisation of each challenge concentration: 75%: 0 / 20 animals

 

Other observations: mortality: no mortality during the test.

 

Clinical signs: No clinical signs have been observed during the test.  

 

Body weight: No changes were noted.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Not classified
Executive summary:

Information from migrated NONS file, as per inquiry number 06-0000020725-70-0000, permission to refer granted by ECHA.

 

Study conducted to GLP (taken from SNIF file). Registrant referring to studies >12 years old at the permission of ECHA. 

 

Not sensitising. The substance is not classified.